From 'Mine' to 'Ours': The 'Diamond Drill' Takes On More 'Delicate Work'
The 'Diamond Drill' Takes On More 'Delicate Work'
— An Ideological Clash Sparked by a Cross-Unit Equipment Loan in a Rocket Force Brigade
■ PLA Daily Reporter Xu Xiaolong, Special Correspondent Fang Lei
"Boom——" As the sound of drilling pierced through the mountain, the most intractable stretch of poor geology deep in the mountains was finally broken through.
As the dust settled, Staff Sergeant Third Class Wang Gang, who had driven cross-unit to provide support with the equipment, crouched beside the drilling rig, wiping mud from the drill rod and inspecting the gear. The drill bit showed wear, but the core components remained robust, with all parameters meeting the required standards.
This costly "diamond drill" had once left officers and soldiers in a difficult position when a sister unit sent an urgent request to borrow it. At the time, the sister unit's construction site had encountered fractured rock strata, water seepage, and mud surges; conventional equipment could not operate, and this piece of equipment was urgently needed for support.
To lend it meant bearing the risk of wear and damage; not to lend it meant leaving the neighboring unit's assault operation at a standstill. The request letter sat on the desk, and after repeated deliberation, the brigade leadership finally decided to sign and approve it.
Now, the obstacle has become a passageway, and the equipment has rendered new merit. This is not only a victory in the construction assault battle, but also a successful "breakout" from parochialism (本位主义).
I
Previously, the brigade had itself encountered the same type of geological problem during construction. To address it, they applied to higher authorities to purchase a specialized drilling and exploration piece of equipment, and after completing the phased task, placed it in storage and maintenance according to procedure.
After receiving the sister unit's call for assistance, the brigade Party committee convened an intense discussion.
In fact, it was inevitable that everyone had reservations: some ran the "economic account," arguing that long-distance transport and high-intensity operation of expensive equipment—should it suffer wear or even damage—would leave the question of who bears responsibility unanswered. Some ran the "mission account," worried that the loan period would be uncontrollable, and that if their own subsequent tasks required the equipment and it could not be returned in time, what then? Others harbored a "sweep only the snow from your own doorstep" mentality, holding that their prized possession need not be casually deployed for someone else's affairs.
"If everyone only fixes their eyes on their own 'one-third of an acre,' only calculates their own 'petty calculations,' then where does full-domain operations (全域作战) and system-based training (体系练兵) come from?" Hearing the discussion, the brigade's political commissar fell into deep thought. He swept his gaze across the meeting room and asked: "We often say there are no bystanders when it comes to preparing for war, but when faced with concrete gains and losses, have we truly considered the overall gains and losses? If we were actually on the battlefield, could this kind of each-fighting-on-its-own approach win?"
This question struck a nerve.
Everyone came to a deep recognition that the cause of strengthening the military is an organic whole; one-sidedly emphasizing "yours" and "mine" while neglecting full-domain effectiveness is, in essence, parochialism at work, and a manifestation of the combat effectiveness standard (战斗力标准) not being firmly established. Before the sole and fundamental standard of combat effectiveness, any narrow-minded thinking must yield.
After discussion, analysis, and reflection, the brigade Party committee ultimately reached consensus: not only should the equipment be lent, but it should be lent quickly and in full. Not only should the equipment be dispatched, but capable technical backbone personnel should accompany it to provide support, helping the sister unit overcome difficulties without reservation.
II
The "breaking of the ice" in thinking brought decisiveness in action. The brigade activated its emergency equipment allocation mechanism, organized forces to work through the night, and conducted a comprehensive overhaul and calibration of the specialized drilling equipment to ensure it left storage in a "zero-hidden-defect" state; the headquarters rapidly coordinated transport capacity and opened a green channel.
At the same time, an equipment-accompanying detachment composed of experienced professional technical backbone personnel rapidly assembled, carrying a complete set of spare parts and technical plans, and set out together with the equipment for the sister unit's construction front line.
Upon arriving at the mission area, the backbone personnel of the equipment-accompanying detachment did not stand by as spectators or play a supporting role—they anchored themselves at the work site, conducting hands-on equipment operation demonstrations, performing real-time adjustments of operating parameters, and closely monitoring the entire construction process in complex geological conditions to provide technical support.
"The fractures in the rock strata have changed; the drilling parameters need to be adjusted accordingly." On the noisy work face, Wang Gang, a Staff Sergeant Third Class and backbone member of the equipment-accompanying detachment, kept his eyes fixed on the main control display screen, loudly guiding operations while recording data to optimize the construction plan.
During the mission, he was responsible not only for the daily inspection and maintenance of the equipment, but also for jointly assessing dangerous situations and overcoming difficulties with the comrades of the sister unit—something that deeply moved the comrades fighting alongside him.
During that period, the work site was brightly lit, and the officers and soldiers of the two units fought side by side. Faced with sudden technical bottlenecks, the equipment-accompanying detachment set no conditions and drew no distinctions between "theirs" and "ours," giving concrete form to the concept of "close coordination (密切协同)" in every precise drilling operation and every successful resolution of a hazard.
The construction difficulties were successfully resolved and the mission was accomplished in full. The equipment returned intact, and the brigade's subsequent construction tasks were not affected in the slightest.
"One cross-domain coordination operation both relieved the sister unit's urgent need and maximized the effectiveness of high-precision advanced equipment," Wang Gang reflected. "It truly achieved equipment sharing and joint use, with multiple parties achieving mutual benefit and increased effectiveness."
III
At the after-action review meeting at the close of construction, the atmosphere was lively and candid.
Party member backbone personnel from both units sat together and reviewed not only the process of this cross-domain coordination, but also conducted a brainstorming session on deeper questions such as "how to improve smooth-blasting quality (光爆质量)" and "how to control construction costs." Through the days and nights of joint assault operations, the officers and soldiers came to understand ever more clearly: breaking down organizational barriers (编制壁垒), dismantling ideological fences (思想藩篱), and enabling limited high-precision advanced equipment to exert maximum effectiveness in achieving victory—this is what it means to practice a correct view of performance (正确政绩观).
"Before, I always felt that 'teaching your apprentice would starve the master.' Coming out this time, I realized that 'holding something back' is narrow parochialism; only through mentoring and passing on skills can fingers curl into a fist." These words from Li Yongxu, a Senior Corporal Second Class and member of the equipment-accompanying detachment, expressed the ideological transformation everyone had undergone. From initial concerns about equipment wear and calculations of personal gain and loss, to proactively opening up resources and providing full-spectrum, full-domain enablement—this equipment loan operation became a vivid classroom for recalibrating the orientation of performance and tempering the sense of the overall situation (大局观念).
The brigade Party committee struck while the iron was hot and drew a profound conclusion: there are no bystanders in preparing for war, and there are no dividing lines in full-domain operations. They then converted the ideological dividends of this mission into institutional results: in accordance with relevant regulations on equipment support management, they formulated implementing rules for cross-area equipment resource sharing, placed large special-purpose equipment under regional unified management to maximize effectiveness, and improved the technical coordination and linkage mechanism, regularly organizing cross-area joint operations, mutual exchange of professional skills, and joint tactics research and discussion.
The reporter observed in the brigade headquarters' equipment dispatch room that an electronic screen displays in real time the dynamic distribution and mission saturation of equipment across units in the region. Not long ago, when another sister unit encountered an equipment gap while executing an urgent and difficult task, equipment dispatcher Assistant Officer Wu directly connected with a special-purpose crane that was within its mission window period. Within a few hours, the equipment set out for cross-area support, with no need for an ad hoc meeting to study and coordinate the matter.
From relying on written requests for transfer to flowing through institutional procedures, this transformation has torn down the "wall between hearts" in thinking and cleared the "blockage points" in cooperation.
The evening mountain breeze sweeps across the position. Another round of construction assault operations begins.
Reporter's Notes
From "Mine" to "Ours"
No matter how advanced a piece of construction equipment may be, if it only sleeps in the warehouse, it is ultimately nothing more than an expensive steel ornament; only by being set in motion and put to use can it be transformed into a weapon for defeating the enemy and securing victory. The significance of this cross-domain support operation transcends the physical measure of a specialized drill penetrating rock strata, and demonstrates through vivid practice: without overall coordination there is no efficiency, and without coordination there is no combined strength. Deepening political consolidation training (深化政治整训) embodies precisely the systemic thinking of "the overall situation as a single game of chess (全局一盘棋)."
Thought is the precursor to action; the source of combat effectiveness generation lies in the breaking of the ice in concepts. The mechanism for victory in modern warfare and complex missions has long since evolved from the lone combat of single platforms and single elements to the comprehensive confrontation of system against system. Deepening political consolidation training means going under the knife against the chronic ailments of parochialism such as "parochial views (门户之见)" and "home-base thinking (家底思维)," guiding the broad ranks of officers and soldiers to step out of the narrow rut of "small-self" interests, consciously calculate the big account and the long-term account of force building and training for war preparedness, subordinate immediate interests to long-term interests, and subordinate local interests to overall interests.
When "mine" is elevated to "ours," all manner of selfish and impure motives will be thoroughly discarded; those "sleeping assets" will be able to break free from the shackles of "one-third of an acre," those "exclusive special skills" will be able to break down the barriers of compartmentalization, and under the catalysis of coordination and jointness, fingers will curl into a fist, condensing into a visible and tangible system-based warfighting capability (体系制胜能力).