← Daily Brief
Doctrine Political Work

Law and Discipline Online | Classification Cannot Be Done 'Off the Top of One's Head'

法纪在线丨定密不能“想当然”
PLA Daily (解放军报) 9 May 2026
View original source ↗
A PLA headquarters unit's secrecy officer corrected a staff officer who had arbitrarily over-classified a document, triggering a unit Party committee response that included mandatory secrecy training, inspection-and-rectification campaigns, and an assessment regime barring personnel who fail from handling documents or communications. The article is a compliance-education piece published in a PLA outlet and follows a standard pattern of using individual disciplinary cases to reinforce secrecy regulations; it contains no new information about PLA classification policy but illustrates the institutional mechanisms—Party committee oversight, superior secrecy department lectures, and pass/fail assessments—through which the PLA enforces document-handling standards at the unit level.

Classification Cannot Be Done 'Off the Top of One's Head'

■ Li Yuanfei

"Staff Officer Zhang, the classification level marked on this document does not conform to the standards for identifying classified matters. Please re-classify it in accordance with secrecy regulations."

Not long ago, Xiao Li, a secrecy officer (保密员) at a certain unit, brought a newly circulated document approval form to a section of the headquarters organ.

Upon receiving the feedback, Staff Officer Zhang of that section felt somewhat aggrieved: "This document contains sensitive information about the unit and its officers and soldiers. I set the classification level higher precisely to draw everyone's attention and prevent information leaks caused by carelessness during work."

"Being cautious and responsible is not a justification for arbitrarily raising a document's classification level. Relevant regulations make clear that the determination of classification levels for military classified documents follows strict scope, authority, and procedures—it must be precisely determined against the applicable standards." Drawing on typical cases of classification violations that had been previously circulated, Xiao Li walked Staff Officer Zhang through several accounts of the costs of 'under-classified matters being over-classified' (低密高定).

"First, the security account: arbitrarily expanding the scope of classification dilutes the core classified information that genuinely requires priority protection, and actually weakens the protective force applied to that core classified content. Second, the efficiency account: arbitrarily raising a document's classification level subjects non-classified documents to the full management process for classified documents, which not only substantially increases the cost of managing secret documents but also slows the efficiency of normal official business, and may even affect the personal interests of officers and soldiers. Third, the law-and-discipline account: failing to classify according to legally prescribed standards is itself a violation of secrecy regulations. Once adverse consequences result, the corresponding disciplinary and legal responsibility must be borne."

Regulation after regulation explained, harm after harm laid out—Staff Officer Zhang bowed his head, flushed with embarrassment, and recognized where the problem lay. He immediately withdrew the document with the incorrectly marked classification level, carefully studied the regulations governing document classification, and re-marked the classification level.

Afterward, Staff Officer Zhang proactively made a self-criticism at the headquarters organ's handover meeting, using his own personal experience to warn everyone: classification work cannot be done 'off the top of one's head,' and even less can it be determined arbitrarily on the basis of subjective judgment.

After the unit's Party committee learned of the situation, it attached great importance to the matter and made clear that secrecy work must be standardized throughout every step. They subsequently conducted special secrecy work training and inspection-and-rectification campaigns at all levels, earnestly correcting problems such as subjectivity and arbitrariness in secrecy work.

"Before, I only knew that secrecy work was important, but in actually handling official business, lapses were inevitable. During the training, I not only clarified the regulations on secrecy discipline but also learned quite a few practical methods and approaches for secrecy work." A secrecy officer at the unit told this reporter that, in order to further improve the secrecy capabilities of relevant personnel, the unit organized all headquarters organ cadres and secrecy backbone personnel to systematically study secrecy laws and regulations. They also invited superior secrecy departments to conduct special lectures, established dedicated on-the-job training and assessment specifically for secrecy work personnel, and stipulated that anyone who fails the assessment is categorically prohibited from handling document and communications business.

Today, Staff Officer Zhang has become someone who truly understands secrecy work. Every time he handles a document, a list of classified matters (涉密事项清单) is always laid out on his desk, and whenever he encounters content he is uncertain about, he consults the secrecy department at the first opportunity. He said with deep feeling: "There is no small matter in secrecy work. Only by strictly following the regulations can one truly build a solid line of defense for the unit's secrecy and security."

Original Chinese
定密不能“想当然” ■李元飞 “张干事,这份文件标注的密级不符合涉密事项认定标准,请按照保密规定重新定密。”前不久,某部保密员小李拿着刚流转来的文电审批件,来到机关某股。 接到反馈意见,该股张干事有些委屈:“这份文件内容包含单位和官兵的敏感信息,我把密级定高一点,也是为了引起大家重视,防止工作中不注意造成信息泄露。” “谨慎负责不是随意提高文件密级的理由,相关法规明确,军队涉密文件的密级判定有着严格的范围、权限和流程,必须对照规定精准核定。”结合前期通报的定密违规典型案例,小李给张干事算了“低密高定”的几本账,“第一是安全账,随意扩大定密范围,会让真正需要重点防护的核心涉密信息被稀释,反而削弱了核心涉密内容的防护力度;第二是效能账,随意提高文件密级,让非涉密文件按涉密文件全流程管理,不仅大幅增加秘密文件管理成本,还会拖慢正常业务办理效率,甚至影响官兵的切身利益;第三是法纪账,不按法定标准定密,本身就是违反保密法规的行为,一旦造成不良后果,必须承担相应的纪律和法律责任。” 一句句法规解读,一条条危害剖析,让张干事低头脸红,意识到了问题所在。他当即撤回了错标密级的文件,仔细学习文件定密规定后,重新标注密级。 事后,张干事主动在机关交班会上作了检讨,用自己的亲身经历警示大家,定密工作不能“想当然”,更不能凭主观判断随意定。 该部党委了解情况后高度重视,明确保密工作必须全程规范。随后,他们在各级开展保密工作专项培训和排查整治,认真纠治保密工作主观随意等问题。 “以前只知道保密工作重要,但是实际办理业务时,难免会有疏忽。培训中,我不仅明晰了保密纪律规定,也学习到了不少保密工作的经验做法。”该部一名保密员告诉笔者,为进一步提升相关人员保密能力,该部组织全体机关干部、保密骨干系统学习保密法律法规,还邀请上级保密部门开展专题授课,针对保密工作人员专门设置岗位培训考核,规定考核不合格者一律不得承办文电业务。 如今,张干事成为了保密工作的明白人,每次承办文电,桌上总会摆着涉密事项清单,遇到拿不准的内容第一时间向保密部门咨询。他深有感触地说:“保密无小事,只有严格依规,才能真正筑牢部队保密安全的坚固防线。”