Series on "Preventing and Correcting Deviations in the Outlook on Political Performance" | No Flowery Punches and Embroidered Kicks — Seek Real Results and Real Effectiveness
No Flowery Punches and Embroidered Kicks — Seek Real Results and Real Effectiveness
— "Preventing and Correcting Deviations in the Outlook on Political Performance (防范和纠治政绩观偏差)" Series, No. 11
■ Li Yongtao
● Selfish motives and distracting thoughts are the great enemy of a correct outlook on political performance (政绩观), and an even more formidable enemy of combat effectiveness building. Break free from self-serving thinking; persist in proceeding from reality and from actual combat in all things.
Chairman Xi has profoundly pointed out that we must establish a correct outlook on political performance, handle well the relationships between stability and progress, establishment and abolition, the abstract and the concrete, symptoms and root causes, and the near-term and the long-term, adhere to baseline thinking (底线思维), and strengthen risk awareness. The contest on the battlefield is real blow against real blow, hard collision against hard collision — it tolerates no flowery punches and embroidered kicks (花拳绣腿) whatsoever. To forge superior warfighting capabilities and calmly meet the test of war that may come at any moment, Party member cadres in the military must establish and practice a correct outlook on political performance, always put the combat effectiveness standard front and center, put combat effectiveness building front and center, resolutely eliminate the bad tendency of emphasizing slogans over action and emphasizing traces over real results, achieve both pragmatic work (务实) and principled deliberation (务虚), ensure that every plan conforms to reality, that every task produces tangible results on the ground, and that every item of political performance is genuine and reliable.
"The distinction between the abstract and the concrete is the hinge between misfortune and fortune." Principled deliberation (务虚) and pragmatic work (务实) are dialectically unified and inseparable. For the broad ranks of Party member cadres, genuine principled deliberation is by no means empty talk with nothing to say, nor hollow posturing divorced from reality; rather, it is rational thinking grounded in objective laws to assess the situation, aligned with the overall situation to plan for the long term, and focused on core responsibilities to clarify the way forward. Pragmatic work, meanwhile, is the concrete practice of locking onto objectives and driving implementation hard, confronting problems head-on to overcome difficulties, and deeply cultivating one's core responsibilities to achieve real results — it is the ultimate landing point and destination of principled deliberation. Countless facts demonstrate that principled deliberation divorced from pragmatic work is a mirage, while pragmatic work divorced from principled deliberation easily loses direction and degenerates into blind, brute effort. Only by combining the abstract with the concrete and unifying knowledge with action can Party member cadres accurately read the situation, clarify their thinking, identify problems precisely, and produce real results.
Yet it cannot be denied that in reality some Party member cadres have failed to properly handle the relationship between the abstract and the concrete, and deviations have appeared in their outlook on political performance. Some narrowly misunderstand the meaning of principled deliberation and are keen on convening meetings and issuing documents, making declarations and building momentum, with work remaining at the level of deployment — implementing documents with documents and meetings with meetings, passing instructions layer by layer without ever seeing concrete measures take root. Some have fallen into the trap of tracism (痕迹主义), emphasizing leaving traces over real results and packaging over actual effectiveness, treating the filling out of forms, reporting of materials, and completion of ledgers and checklists as the main event. Some approach their work without method or technique, unable to grasp its distinctive features, unable to seize on key priorities, unable to clear bottlenecks. Still others seek quick success and instant benefit, coveting empty fame, caring only about momentarily "showing off," preferring to build highly visible "vanity projects (面子工程)," and unwilling to cultivate the latent-achievement projects (潜绩工程) that lay foundations and benefit the long term — resulting in an abundance of hollow work and a scarcity of real results, which not only contributes nothing to improving combat effectiveness but also corrupts the healthy atmosphere for getting things done.
The root cause of these phenomena is that some Party member cadres are driven by selfish motives and distracting thoughts, placing personal advancement and personal gain ahead of the cause of strengthening the military, rushing for quick results in their work, pursuing a superficially impressive appearance, and departing from the original aspiration and mission that Communists should uphold. At the same time, it also stems from a weakening of the spirit of responsibility — acting with hesitation and timidity, harboring the negative mentality that "the more you do, the more mistakes you make; the less you do, the fewer mistakes; do nothing and make no mistakes" — and when problems arise, taking the easy way out, going through the motions, and muddling through. In addition, there are shortcomings in capability and quality: unable to plan from a high vantage point or coordinate scientifically, and also lacking the superior capabilities to drive implementation hard and break through difficulties, ultimately sinking into the mire of "principled deliberation that goes nowhere and pragmatic work that goes astray." If these various deviations and deficiencies are not corrected, they will inevitably cause departure from the correct direction, corrupt the atmosphere within the ranks, harm the interests of the masses, and ultimately delay the development of the cause.
"All evils arise from the character of selfishness; all good things come from the character of public-mindedness." Once a person harbors selfish motives and distracting thoughts and is always calculating their own "little abacus," subjectivism and departmentalism will inevitably take root imperceptibly. Looking at problems, they will proceed from subjective wishes rather than objective reality; making decisions, they will proceed from individual interests rather than the overall situation of the cause's development; all manner of rule-violating and boundary-crossing behavior will emerge, and it will be very difficult to be impartial and to clearly distinguish public from private. Selfish motives and distracting thoughts are the great enemy of a correct outlook on political performance, and an even more formidable enemy of combat effectiveness building. Party member cadres must always uphold a heart devoted to the public good, resolutely cast aside personal honor, disgrace, gain, and loss, break free from self-serving thinking, persist in proceeding from reality and from actual combat in all things, place the overall situation first and the cause first, balance the present with the long term and the overall with the local, actively and wholeheartedly do whatever benefits combat effectiveness building, and distance themselves from and avoid whatever does not.
"Dedication to an extraordinary cause demands an extraordinary spirit and extraordinary responsibility." Establishing and practicing a correct outlook on political performance requires that the broad ranks of Party member cadres not shrink from major matters, not shirk difficult matters, and not slack off on minor matters — daring to take responsibility, willing to take responsibility, and skilled at taking responsibility. Failing to take responsibility and failing to act, floating in work style, talking empty talk, playing at hollow formalism, and when confronted with contradictions and difficulties either passing them up to superiors or pushing them down to subordinates — this not only accomplishes nothing but will also delay and even damage combat effectiveness building. The broad ranks of Party member cadres must resolutely abandon the "safety standard" of treating the avoidance of incidents as the criterion, and the thinking and work style of coveting ease and comfort; resolutely oppose the formalism of flowery punches and embroidered kicks; consciously shoulder the responsibilities that must be shouldered and take up the burdens that must be taken up; take the lead in charging into the fray; confront hardship, difficulty, risk, and challenge head-on; and in particular devote full effort to those matters that may seem unremarkable but are most urgently needed for war preparedness and most needed at the grassroots level — daring to take on tasks rather than pushing them away, building more achievements rather than competing for credit, and achieving genuine political performance through superior responsibility.
"Without thick beams, one cannot bear heavy loads." Advancing combat effectiveness building without superior capabilities as support means that no matter how good the plans, how solid the measures, or how high the objectives, they can only be "castles in the air." In reality, some Party member cadres, though enthusiastic about getting things done, often find their ambitions exceed their abilities because their capabilities are insufficient. This requires us both to be skilled at taking command of the overall situation and looking to the long term — conducting rational thinking, scientific planning, design and conception, and optimization and adjustment of combat effectiveness building — and to improve our capacity for pragmatic work, being skilled at refining work plans and program deployments into hard measures for training and war preparedness and practical methods for solving difficult problems, clarifying the division of responsibilities and stipulating deadlines for completion, carrying forward the drilling tenacity and staying power of driving in nails, working hard and with genuine effort, burying our heads and working diligently, holding on without letting go and following through to the end, achieving "if a thing is not to be done, leave it alone; if it is to be done, it must be done to the end" — truly producing real results and achieving real effectiveness.
Flowery punches and embroidered kicks will surely fail to accomplish anything; only seeking truth and being pragmatic can lead to success. On the new journey, facing complex and arduous tasks of reform and development, the broad ranks of Party member cadres must prevent and correct deviations in the outlook on political performance, firmly establish a pragmatic character, neither engaging in grandiose and blind brute effort, nor engaging in showy and impractical opportunism, and still less engaging in the pursuit of quick success and the exhaustion of resources — and genuinely use planning that "deliberates within the command tent" and practice that "decides victory a thousand li away" to drive the comprehensive and superior building of all aspects of the force.