China Mil Watch Mandarin-source monitoring · Chinese military & security reporting
Independent monitor
Official PRC military media, read in the original
← Daily Brief
Exercises Political Work

A Navy Unit's Party Committee Guides Grassroots Units in Cultivating a Strong Atmosphere of Combat Training and War Preparedness

海军某部党委引导基层浓厚练兵备战氛围
PLA Daily (解放军报) 22 May 2026
View original source ↗
An unidentified PLA Navy unit's Party committee, responding to a failed rapid-mobilization drill in early May in which a storeroom manager's pre-inspection 'tidying' prevented squads from drawing equipment on time, issued new rules banning inspection-driven adjustments (迎检式调整) to training plans and storeroom layouts, and published Detailed Rules for the Daily Implementation of Combat-Readiness Standards to enforce baseline combat-readiness posture regardless of inspection schedules. The article documents a recognized institutional pathology — cosmetic compliance overriding functional readiness — and records one unit's attempt to break the cycle through binding procedural rules rather than political exhortation alone. What remains unknown is the unit's identity, fleet affiliation, and whether the new evaluation system has measurably changed drill outcomes beyond the anecdotal corporal testimony the article offers.

One day in early May, a Navy unit organized a certain battalion to conduct a combat-readiness rapid-mobilization drill. When the whistle sounded, Squad Leader Li Gen, who had been in the middle of maintaining his weapon, snapped to attention and stopped what he was doing. There had been absolutely no advance word about this combat-readiness mobilization, but Li Gen did not panic — he immediately organized his soldiers and headed to the combat-readiness storeroom. When they arrived at the floor where the storeroom was located, however, he was dumbstruck. By all rights, personnel should have been entering the storeroom by squad and platoon in turn to draw their equipment and then quickly assemble downstairs. But now the storeroom was a one-way bottleneck — people were going in but not coming out — and all he could faintly hear from inside were voices asking where the riot shields were and others shouting that they couldn't find the batons.

"The various supplies in the storeroom are kept in relatively fixed positions to make them easy to grab — how could anyone not find things?" Li Gen stared at the scene before him, completely baffled. The storeroom manager who had caused the chaos stood there red-faced, sweating with anxiety.

It turned out that a superior leader had come to conduct an inspection that morning, and in order to "make a good impression," the storeroom manager had deliberately "tidied up" the storeroom, stacking all supplies and equipment "neatly." Because he had been single-mindedly pursuing an "attractive appearance" at the time, some items of equipment had been "tucked away" deep inside. It was precisely this round of "rearranging" that caused the chaos now unfolding.

In the end, the company to which Li Gen belonged failed to complete its assembly within the prescribed time, and the battalion's overall mobilization result was rated "unsatisfactory."

The disorder triggered by this inspection-preparation effort caught the attention of the unit's Party committee. After conducting research, they found that such situations were far from rare: on the training ground, officers and soldiers should be grouped according to ability level for targeted remediation and specialized intensive training, but when an inspection or observation visit was imminent, some unit leaders would deliberately standardize training content and tempo to ensure "uniformity of movement"; in day-to-day management, garrison order and interior hygiene were ordinarily maintained according to combat-readiness standards, but as an inspection approached, some comrades would "sweat the details" and "dress things up," caring only about appearances while casting combat-readiness effectiveness aside entirely. On these phenomena, the unit's Party committee took an unambiguous stance: "Do leaders and staff organs come down to inspect grassroots units just to see whether things look 'attractive' and 'neat'? We must not disrupt work order or alter the normal state of combat readiness for the sake of inspection preparation — we must correct this without delay!"

To that end, the unit on one hand required that staff organ observation visits not focus on the scale of the scene, that inspections not interfere with daily order, and that supervision not consume training time; it established a pragmatic evaluation system and set up a supervision team to identify and rectify phenomena such as "showy formalism" (花架子) at the grassroots level. On the other hand, the unit drew up Detailed Rules for the Daily Implementation of Combat-Readiness Standards (《战备标准日常落实细则》) based on relevant regulations and actual grassroots conditions, stipulating that once a training plan has been approved, grassroots units must execute it rigidly except under special circumstances, so as to eliminate "inspection-driven adjustments" (迎检式调整), foster a strong atmosphere in which everything serves combat training and war preparedness, and ensure that officers and soldiers are not distracted for even a moment.

Recently, the unit's staff organ went deep to the front lines to inspect training conduct. When the group arrived at the training ground, officers and soldiers of a certain company were carrying out small-unit tactical training according to plan.

"In the past, the moment we heard that a leader was coming to inspect or observe, we'd start thinking about how to 'perform well,' and our minds would go off track," reflected Corporal Li Feng. "Now we just focus on training steadily and earnestly — there's nothing else we need to think about."

Original Chinese
5月上旬的一天,海军某部组织某营进行战备拉动训练。哨声响起,原本正在保养枪支的班长李根一个激灵停下手中动作。 此次战备拉动事前毫无“风声”,但李根并不慌张,立即组织战士前往战备库房。然而,来到库房所在楼层,他却傻了眼——按理说,大家应该按班排依次进入库房领取装备,随后迅速前往楼下集合。可现在库房“只进不出”,只能隐约听见里面有人问防暴盾牌在哪,还有人喊找不到警棍…… “为了便于拿取,库房内各类物资摆放位置相对固定,怎么会找不到东西?”李根看着眼前的场景很是不解。造成这片混乱的库房管理员则是满脸通红,急得满头大汗。 原来, 当天上午有上级领导前来检查,为了“留个好印象”,库房管理员特意对库房进行了“整理”,将所有物资器材“码放整齐”。因为他当时一心追求“美观”,部分装备物品便被“藏”到了深处。正是这一番“调整”,导致了眼前的混乱。 最终,李根所在连队未能在规定时间内完成集结,全营拉动成绩“不合格”。 这场因为迎检引发的混乱,引起该部党委的注意。他们经过调研发现,此类情况并不鲜见:训练场上,官兵应按照能力水平分组补差、专攻精练,但遇到检查观摩时,部分带兵人便会刻意统一训练内容节奏,确保“动作整齐划一”;日常管理中,营区秩序、内务卫生原本依照战备标准保持,可临近检查,便有同志“抠细节”“做包装”,只求“好看”,却将战备实效抛之脑后……对于这些现象,该部党委态度鲜明:“难道领导和机关到基层检查就是只看是否‘好看’、是否‘整齐’吗?不能为了迎检打乱工作秩序、改变战备常态,必须及时纠偏!” 为此,该部一方面要求机关观摩不看场面大小、检查不干扰日常秩序、督导不占用训练时间,建立务实评价体系,并成立监督小组,对基层“花架子”等现象进行纠治;另一方面依据相关规定和基层实际情况制订《战备标准日常落实细则》,明确训练计划一经审批,非特殊情况,基层须刚性执行,杜绝“迎检式调整”,营造一切为了练兵备战的浓厚氛围,不让官兵有丝毫分心走神。 近日,该部机关深入一线检查训练作风。一行人到达训练场时,某连官兵正照计划开展小队战术训练。 “以前一听有领导检查观摩,就要琢磨怎么‘好好表现’,心思都‘跑偏’了。”下士李冯感慨,“现在我们只管踏踏实实训练,其他无需多想。”