← Daily Brief
Internal Security Political Work

Party Committee of a Battalion of the First Guard Regiment, PAP Chongqing General Corps Conducts No-Holds-Barred After-Action Review

武警重庆总队执勤第一支队某大队党委复盘研讨真刀实枪
PLA Daily (解放军报) 18 May 2026
View original source ↗
A battalion of the First Guard Regiment, PAP Chongqing General Corps, held a compulsory after-action review following two consecutive failures: a near-bottom finish in a higher-authority military skills competition and a 'poor rating' on a regiment-level inspection of a signature cultural activity. The review documents a recurring institutional problem in PAP units — compartmentalized command, where the battalion commander and political instructor each managed their domains independently, creating resource conflicts that degraded both training and political work simultaneously. The article fits a pattern of PLA Daily using named unit failures to model the criticism-and-self-criticism process as a corrective mechanism, with the explicit framing of 'distorted political achievement outlook' (政绩观错位) confirming that the campaign against performative compliance and 'vanity projects' remains an active line of emphasis in PAP political work.

Party Committee of a Battalion of the First Guard Regiment, PAP Chongqing General Corps Conducts No-Holds-Barred After-Action Review——

Falling Twice, Coming Away Wiser

■ Yao Cheng, Yao Maomao, PLA Daily Special Correspondent Zhang Yongqing

Battalion officers and soldiers studying and discussing training subjects. Photo by Guo Chuanwu

Not long ago, temperatures in Chongqing were climbing, but the atmosphere in the conference room of a certain battalion of the First Guard Regiment, PAP Chongqing General Corps had dropped to "freezing point." The battalion party committee was leading party member cadres in an after-action review, analyzing the reasons for failure in two important areas of work.

Some time earlier, the battalion had ranked near the bottom overall in a military skills competition organized by higher authorities, and a carefully organized signature cultural activity had also received a "poor rating" during a regiment-level inspection.

Falling twice in a row left the battalion party committee unable to sit still. For this after-action review, the regiment leadership assigned to provide guidance and assistance also attended the meeting as observers.

At the outset, the atmosphere was somewhat heavy, and no one dared to fire the "first shot" lightly. After a moment of silence, the deputy political instructor responsible for organizing the signature cultural activity spoke up: "For this outcome, I must conduct a profound self-examination. I did not keep close enough watch day-to-day, did not grasp things concretely enough, which led to the signature highlights not being distinctive enough…"

He had barely gotten two sentences into his prepared remarks when the attending regiment leadership interrupted him: "A review and analysis this painless and inconsequential is better left undone!"

The regiment leader then recounted an episode from the experience of a revolutionary predecessor. In the summer of 1938, the position of commander of the Eighth Route Army's 344th Brigade was vacant, and Tian Shouyao, a regimental commander with outstanding combat achievements, was not promoted to fill it and developed a resentful attitude.

Zhu De subjected Tian Shouyao to severe criticism at the brigade party committee meeting: "Whoever the play calls for, that person performs; if it hasn't called for you, you cannot take the stage. You are a Communist Party member! We all follow the Party Central Committee—you cannot throw a tantrum."

The frank, soul-touching criticism awakened Tian Shouyao. Thereafter he cast aside selfish thoughts, threw himself into the anti-Japanese battlefield, repeatedly distinguished himself in battle, and later died a heroic death, becoming an anti-Japanese hero whose name is recorded in history.

"Criticism and self-criticism is the best method of ideological remolding (思想改造). Whether that remolding is genuine depends entirely on whether the criticism is real and whether people are truly serious about it. Some of the prominent problems that have appeared in unit development are, at their root, problems of ideology and work style. To resolve them at the source, we must go at it with real swords and real spears (真刀实枪), getting down to specific people, specific events, and specific thinking." The regiment leadership told everyone: "Today's after-action review is not a session for reading from scripts, and still less is it a formality to go through. Everyone must dig into the problems, probe the lesions, say what there is to say, and focus the study on whatever problems are most serious."

These words caused everyone to set aside their reservations entirely. The battalion political instructor took the lead in reflecting: "I am the party committee secretary and bear primary responsibility. The main cause lies in problems with my coordination of work—rehearsals for the performance and remedial intensive training were all competing for time, venues, and resources. Why were they competing? Because both sides were striving to show results and wanted to produce achievements. This is departmentalism (本位主义) and utilitarianism (功利主义); at the root, there has been a deviation in the outlook on political achievements (政绩观)."

Seeing the political instructor proactively "exposing his own shortcomings," the battalion commander also acknowledged frankly: "In my day-to-day work I habitually focus on my own 'three-thirds of an acre' (一亩三分地). I regarded military training as a hard indicator and cultural development as a soft task—time could be dragged out as long as possible, venues could be occupied whenever possible. At a deeper level, I did not communicate enough with the political instructor; we each fought our own battle, which both affected overall development and imposed a great deal of unnecessary burden on the officers and soldiers."

The two principal leaders turned the blade inward and completely pierced that layer of paper over the window. Everyone also set down their prepared remarks, opened their hearts, and picked up the "scalpel" to cut deep into their thinking: some reflected on treating their area of responsibility as a private plot, attending only to the part and ignoring the whole; some identified their habit of using "busy with work" as an excuse, deploying tasks without rolling up their sleeves, accustomed to being an "absentee manager" (甩手掌柜); some analyzed their tendency to pick easy tasks and avoid hard ones, to detour around contradictions and problems, unwilling to criticize and unwilling to struggle.

A company political instructor was blunt in his specific analysis: "Cultural activities should educate, inspire, and guide people. Looking back at ours, during rehearsals we picked apart every single movement over and over again for a very long time, pursuing only form and surface spectacle one-sidedly, but we did not work hard enough at excavating the content and substance of the activity. The result was rain that only wets the surface—the officers and soldiers came away with no real impression or feeling." He noted that a sister unit had cleverly made quietly dedicated local exemplars the protagonists of their cultural activity, using nearby examples to educate nearby people, which more readily moved everyone.

"Pursuing spectacle is about getting leaders to take notice; lacking investigation means disregarding whether the officers and soldiers are satisfied. These problems are all classic cases of a distorted outlook on political achievements (政绩观错位)." The regiment leadership picked up the thread and continued the analysis: "We also need to carefully identify next how many more of these 'vanity projects' (面子工程) and 'bonsai designs' (盆景设计) remain, and resolutely rectify every one of them."

The topic turned to the failure in the skills competition, and the deputy battalion commander proactively reflected: "The fact that sister units surpassed us this time was not only because they showed significant improvement in difficult and key subjects—more importantly, their foundational training subjects were more solid than ours. In the past we had situations of cobbling together top performers to win scores; this time, with all personnel rotating through as participants, the shortfall in our weak foundation was completely exposed."

"A single branch in bloom does not mean the whole garden is full of spring; excelling in individual events does not mean the whole is strong." As everyone listened and discussed: "In our day-to-day training organization, we have not implemented specialized instructor assignment, pass-or-fail assessment mechanisms, and tiered training methods with enough force—some have even been left in neutral."

From incisive self-dissection, to straightforwardly identifying deep-level problems, to jointly analyzing and discussing in search of solutions, the atmosphere in the meeting room grew increasingly animated.

Interest groups could be established to encourage officers and soldiers to independently design cultural and recreational activities; it is necessary to strengthen cooperation with local red-heritage venues, and in connection with the 90th anniversary of the victory of the Red Army's Long March, to deeply excavate and apply red resources to educate and forge the soul (育人铸魂); establish digital training records for each officer and soldier, precisely analyze shortfalls, and dynamically provide remedial training; invite outstanding coaches from the General Corps and regiment to give demonstration instruction, and cultivate a core of coaches… The reporter observed everyone simultaneously discussing and writing down specific corrective measures on paper.

Ideological remolding (思想改造) has no completion, only an ongoing process. "Persisting in making good use of the weapon of criticism, and continuously sweeping the dust from one's thinking, is the only way to forge a strong and capable party committee leadership group." The regiment leadership told the reporter that by attending this meeting as an observer, he too had gained many new insights. In the course of continuously deepening political rectification training (政治整训), the regiment party committee must also explore integrating criticism and self-criticism into all areas of work, normalizing reflective analysis and critical reminders, and supervising party member cadres at all levels to continuously improve their work methods and transform their work style.

When the reporter revisited the battalion in recent days, certain scenes left a strong impression: the political instructor, wearing full gear, standing at the head of the formation and training alongside the soldiers; the battalion commander proactively stepping in to fill a gap, guiding a certain company in planning the upgrade of its psychological counseling room…

"Once the problems were laid out in the open, the heart actually felt more at ease," the political instructor said with feeling. That after-action review had made everyone's face burn, but because everyone had spoken frankly and openly, their hearts felt warm. Now, he and the battalion commander meet every day to study work and communicate, strengthening coordination on key tasks; the combined force driving combat readiness training and unit development has grown stronger.

Original Chinese
武警重庆总队执勤第一支队某大队党委复盘研讨真刀实枪—— 连摔两跤 捡个明白 ■姚 诚 姚毛毛 解放军报特约记者 张永清 大队官兵正在研究讨论训练课目。郭传伍摄 前不久,重庆气温攀升,但武警重庆总队执勤第一支队某大队会议室里的气氛却跌到了“冰点”。大队党委正带领党员骨干进行复盘研讨,分析两项重要工作失利的原因。 前段时间,该大队在上级组织的军事比武中整体排名靠后,精心组织的特色文化活动也在支队验收中遭遇“差评”。 连摔两跤,让大队党委一班人坐不住了。这次复盘研究,挂钩帮建的支队领导也到场列席会议。 一开始,气氛有些凝重,谁都不敢轻易放“第一炮”。沉默片刻,负责组织特色文化活动的副教导员开了口:“对于这个结果,我必须作出深刻检讨,平时盯得不够紧,抓得不够实,导致特色亮点不鲜明……” 刚对着稿子说了两句,副教导员的发言就被列席的支队领导叫停:“这样不疼不痒的检视剖析,不如不开!” 随后,这名支队领导给大家讲了一段革命前辈的经历。1938年夏,八路军344旅旅长空缺,战功卓著的团长田守尧未能升任,产生了抵触情绪。 朱德在旅党委会上对田守尧进行了严厉批评:“戏点到谁谁就唱,没点到你就不能出台。共产党员嘛!我们都听党中央的,不能闹情绪。” 直言不讳、触及灵魂的批评,批醒了田守尧。此后他摒弃私心,投身抗日战场,屡立战功,后来壮烈牺牲,成为名垂青史的抗日英雄。 “批评和自我批评是思想改造的最好方式。其改造的成色如何,关键就是看是否真批评、真较真。单位建设出现的一些突出问题,从根子上讲,是思想上、作风上出了问题,想要从根源上解决,必须真刀实枪、见人见事见思想。”支队领导告诉大家,“今天复盘不是来念稿子的,更不是走过场的,大家要盯着问题挖、对着病灶查,有什么就说什么,什么问题严重就重点研究什么。” 这番话,让大家彻底放下了顾虑。大队教导员带头反思:“我是党委书记,负主要责任。主要原因在我工作统筹上出了问题,节目彩排、补差强训都在抢时间、抢场地、抢资源。为什么抢?因为两头都在挣表现、都想出成绩,这就是本位主义、功利主义,根子上是政绩观出现了偏差。” 见教导员主动“亮丑”,大队长也坦言:“我平时开展工作习惯盯着自己的‘一亩三分地’,认为军事训练是硬指标,文化建设是软任务,时间能拖就拖、场地能占就占。更深层的是,我和教导员沟通不够,各自为战,既影响了整体建设,也给官兵们增加了许多不必要的负担。” 两位主官刀刃向内,彻底捅破了那层窗户纸。大家也丢掉讲稿,敞开心扉,拿起“手术刀”向思想深处开刀:有的反思自己把分管领域当成自留地,只顾局部不顾全局;有的查摆自己常以工作忙为借口,开展工作只部署不动手,习惯当“甩手掌柜”;有的剖析自己干事拈轻怕重,遇到矛盾问题常绕道走,不敢批评、不愿斗争。 一名中队指导员在具体剖析时直言不讳:“文化活动应该是教育人激励人引导人的,反观我们这次,排演中细抠每一个动作,来来回回折腾了很久,只是片面追求形式和场面热闹,但对挖掘活动内容内涵下功夫不深,导致雨过地皮湿,官兵没啥印象和感觉。”他说,有兄弟单位巧妙把默默奉献的身边典型变成了文化活动的主角,用身边事教育身边人,更容易让大家受到触动。 “追求场面,就是为了让领导注意;缺乏调研,就是不顾官兵满不满意,这些问题都是典型的政绩观错位。”支队领导接过话茬,展开分析,“咱们接下来还要认真查摆一下,这样的‘面子工程’‘盆景设计’还有多少,都要坚决纠治。” 话题转向比武失利,副大队长主动进行了反思:“兄弟单位这次反超我们,不仅是因为重难点课目提升幅度明显,更重要的是基础训练课目比我们扎实。我们以往有靠拼凑尖子拿成绩的情况,这次全员轮换参考,基础薄弱的短板就彻底暴露了。” “一枝独秀,不代表春色满园;单项冒尖,更不代表整体过硬。”大家一边听一边讨论:“咱们平日组训时,对专长化任教、过关考核机制、分层组训方法等落实不够有力,有的甚至挂了空挡。” 从见筋见骨的自我解剖,到直截了当指出深层次问题,再到一起分析讨论寻找解题思路,会场气氛愈发热烈。 可以建立兴趣小组,鼓励官兵自主设计文体活动;有必要加强与驻地红色场馆协作,结合纪念红军长征胜利90周年,深度挖掘运用红色资源育人铸魂;为每名官兵建立数字训练档案,精准分析短板,动态补差;邀请总队和支队优秀教练员作示范教学,培养教练员骨干……记者看到,大家一边讨论,一边在纸上写下具体的整改措施。 思想改造没有完成时,只有进行时。“坚持用好批评武器,不断打扫思想上的灰尘,才能打造坚强有力的党委班子。”支队领导告诉记者,这次列席会议,他也有很多新的体会。持续深化政治整训中,支队党委也要探索将批评和自我批评融入各项工作,让反思剖析和批评提醒常态化,督导各级党员干部不断改进工作方式、转变工作作风。 近日,记者再次造访该大队时,一些景象令人印象深刻:教导员戴着装具,站在排头,跟战士们一起训练;大队长主动补位,指导某中队筹划升级心理疏导室…… “问题说开了,心里反而更敞亮了。”教导员感慨地说,那场复盘研讨会虽然让人脸上火辣辣的,但大家开诚布公,心里却是热乎乎的。现在,他和大队长每天都会碰头研究工作,沟通交流,对一些重点任务加强统筹,练兵备战和部队建设有了更强的合力。