← Daily Brief
Personnel Political Work

Cultivating Talent for the Long Term: This Unit Intensifies Two-Way Exchange Between Headquarters and Grassroots Cadres

育才为长远计,这个单位加大机关和基层干部双向交流力度
PLA Daily (解放军报) 17 May 2026
View original source ↗
A brigade of the PLA 81st Group Army doubled its rate of headquarters-to-grassroots cadre rotations in the first quarter of this year, with roughly one in ten headquarters cadres reassigned to grassroots positions—several into principal leadership roles—under a newly installed Party committee leadership that also formalized the shift through a written policy document, the Measures for Strengthening Incentives and Care for the Young Officer Corps. The report signals an institutional effort to address what the brigade's own leadership diagnosed as stagnation in the junior officer corps: platoon leaders over-tenured in single positions, company commanders with narrow assignment histories, and headquarters staff with rigid, siloed thinking. The piece is useful as evidence that resistance to cadre rotation—driven by leaders prioritizing operational convenience over talent development—is recognized within the PLA as a systemic problem, and that at least some unit-level Party committees are being pushed, through Xi Jinping's 'correct view of achievements' framework, to treat personnel rotation as a command accountability issue rather than an administrative one.

A Brigade of the 81st Group Army Doubles the Number of Headquarters Cadres Assigned to Grassroots Positions in the First Quarter——

"The Work Can't Do Without Me" Is Not an Excuse

■ Wang Ruolong, PLA Daily Correspondent Zhang Kejin, Wang Desai

A set of figures recently released by a brigade of the 81st Group Army has attracted considerable attention: in the first quarter of this year, nearly one in ten headquarters cadres were transferred to grassroots positions—twice the number from the same period in previous years—with several of them taking up principal leadership posts at the grassroots level.

"Arranging this many headquarters cadres to serve at the grassroots all at once—the resolve and boldness of this Party committee leadership really is something." Even as this sentiment was being expressed, reporters noted that the brigade's two principal leaders had been in post for only a few months. Given such a short time in their new roles, why had they moved so decisively to reassign headquarters cadres?

As the reporting deepened, the answer emerged. It turned out that the brigade's new Party committee leadership had investigated and found that the unit's young cadre corps lacked vitality: some platoon leaders had served in the same position for too long and had gradually lost their edge; some company principal leaders had a narrow range of assignment experience, limiting their growth and advancement; and some headquarters cadres had worked in a single functional area for an extended period, leaving their perspectives and thinking relatively rigid.

"The key to solving these problems lies in breaking down positional barriers and accelerating personnel rotation." After careful analysis, the brigade Party committee concluded that the two-way exchange mechanism between headquarters and grassroots cadres must be put to good use, so that more young cadres could see a clear path for growth and have reason to look forward to their development.

Easier said than done. The brigade's political commissar frankly acknowledged that headquarters work is highly specialized: the longer a cadre serves in a position, the more proficient they become, and the more convenient and reliable they are to work with. Precisely for this reason, individual leaders had grown accustomed to holding onto subordinates they were satisfied with, unwilling to let them go to grassroots assignments.

"Using cadres well and producing more talent is the greater achievement." The brigade Party committee leadership studied and compared Chairman Xi's important statements on establishing and practicing a correct view of achievements (政绩观), engaged in thorough discussion and deliberation, and gradually unified their thinking: within the bounds of policy, human resources must be further activated, the intensity of two-way exchange between headquarters and grassroots cadres must be increased, and it is impermissible to artificially impose restrictions on the simple grounds that "the work can't do without" a given individual.

To ensure this work proceeded in an orderly manner and produced real results, the brigade conducted a comprehensive survey of cadres' career development aspirations, solicited opinions and suggestions widely, and formulated and implemented the Measures for Strengthening Incentives and Care for the Young Officer Corps (《加强年轻军官队伍激励关怀的措施》). The brigade clearly established the orientation of "multi-position tempering, appointment on merit" (多岗历练、择优任用), and while ensuring continuity across all work, carried out large-scale personnel adjustments to invigorate the cadre corps—stirring the still waters of the pool into life.

On the training ground, Company Political Instructor Zhu was in the thick of it. During breaks in training, he sat in a circle with soldiers, using conversation to take the measure of their thinking. This energetic grassroots principal leader had, until recently, been a highly skilled headquarters cadre. Since taking up his company assignment, he rapidly shifted roles, integrated into the company, and went on to win first place in a political instructor competition organized by the brigade.

"Before, I missed several promotion opportunities because I lacked experience as a grassroots principal leader. Now that the brigade Party committee has provided a multi-position development platform, I will absolutely not let the organization down." Political Instructor Zhu said that seeing more prospects for growth and advancement ahead, he now feels full of drive.

Cadre Yang Huan of another company is an "old grassroots hand" who spent five years as a platoon leader alone, and had at one point felt lost about the road ahead. After transferring to the headquarters, he quickly got the chance to prove himself—participating in a Group Army staff skills competition and achieving a strong result.

"Accelerating cadre rotation is not simply a matter of swapping headquarters and grassroots positions. It is a matter of scientific overall planning and systematic advancement." Staff Officer Feng of the brigade headquarters explained that given the relatively narrow development paths facing cadres in non-combat-arms companies due to specialty constraints, and the qualification requirements attached to certain positions, the brigade formulated measures including a young cadre development plan and priority appointment for outstanding grassroots cadres. These measures drive the movement of personnel across different positions, specialties, and domains—between combat-arms and non-combat-arms companies, between command-management and specialist-technical roles, and between military and political work—bringing new vitality and a new outlook to cadre corps development.

Assistant Engineer Zhao Yan of a certain battalion previously served as a company political instructor. With a formal background in computer science, he had long hoped to transfer to a specialist-technical position. The brigade Party committee gave comprehensive consideration to his individual career development and the unit's construction needs, and approved his application for a role change. Zhao Yan is now fully committed to research on the brigade's subject of AI-enabled combat power development (AI赋能战斗力建设), and has already produced multiple results.

The path of two-way exchange between headquarters and grassroots cadres benefits individual cadres and unit development alike—but the pressure falls squarely on the brigade Party committee leadership. Reporters learned that after some grassroots principal leaders were transferred to headquarters positions as section chiefs, they faced the practical challenges of lacking relevant experience and being unfamiliar with headquarters work. In response, brigade leaders proactively stepped forward, personally teaching skills such as drafting documents and organizing meetings, helping these cadres rapidly improve their capabilities and adapt to their positions.

"Keep the inconvenience for yourself; leave the opportunities for your subordinates." Recently, at a special analysis session on studying and practicing a correct view of achievements, the brigade Party committee leadership used the first-quarter cadre adjustments as a case study to analyze and correct ideological deviations present in past work, further clarify muddled understandings, and draw lessons from experience. Upon learning that the cadres newly assigned to these positions had taken on heavy responsibilities and acted on their own initiative after taking up their posts, the brigade's leaders felt gratified by the decision they had made.

Reporter's Notes

Using People Cannot Be About What Is "Convenient"

Cultivating Talent Must Be Planned for the Long Term

■ Zhang Kejin

The problem of insufficient vitality in the young cadre corps does not exist only in this brigade. Reporters hear officers and soldiers raise it frequently when visiting the grassroots. One important reason is that leaders in some units use the excuse that "the work can't do without" a given person to tie young cadres to a single position, artificially restricting normal rotation assignments, study, and training.

At its root, this problem reflects a deviation in the view of achievements. A small number of leaders care only about keeping things "smooth and uneventful" during their own tenure and use people only for their own "convenience." This not only causes the cadre corps to become compacted and stagnant (板结), but also leaves some young cadres feeling lost and without drive because they can see no future or way forward.

Flowing water does not rot; a turning door-hinge does not decay. Party committees at all levels, and especially principal leaders, should establish and practice a correct view of achievements—genuinely keeping the overall situation of the strong-military enterprise (强军事业) in view, thinking ahead to the long-term interests of cadre development and unit construction, accelerating cadre rotation within the bounds of policy, stimulating the vitality of young cadres, and helping them weather storms, broaden their horizons, strengthen their backbone, and build their abilities across multiple positions, so that they may grow at the earliest opportunity into pillars of talent who can be relied upon for great responsibilities and entrusted with heavy burdens.

Original Chinese
第81集团军某旅第一季度机关干部到基层任职人数翻倍—— “工作离不开”不是理由 ■王若龙 解放军报记者 张科进 王德赛 第81集团军某旅近日公布的一组数据格外引人关注:今年第一季度,近一成机关干部交流至基层岗位,是以往同期的两倍,其中多人担任基层主官。 “一次性安排这么多机关干部到基层任职,这届党委班子的决心和魄力确实不小!”感慨之余,记者发现,该旅两名主官到任仅数月。履新时间这么短,他们为何如此调整机关干部? 随着采访的深入,答案浮出水面。原来,该旅新一届党委班子调研了解到,部队年轻干部队伍活力不足,有的排长在同一岗位任职时间过长,锐气逐渐消磨;有的连队主官任职经历单一,成长进步受限;有的机关干部长期从事某一领域工作,视野和思维相对固化。 “要解决这些问题,关键在于打破岗位壁垒、加快人员流动。”该旅党委一班人认真分析后感到,必须用好机关和基层干部双向交流机制,让更多年轻干部明晰成长路径、看到发展希望。 说起来容易做起来难。该旅政委坦言,机关工作专业性强,干部在岗位上干得越久,业务越娴熟,用起来越顺手、越省心。也正因为如此,个别领导往往习惯将自己满意的“身边人”把住不放,不愿让他们去基层任职。 “用好干部、多出人才是更大政绩。”该旅党委一班人对照学习习主席关于树立和践行正确政绩观的重要论述,深入讨论辨析,逐渐统一思想:在政策允许前提下,进一步盘活人力资源,加大机关和基层干部双向交流力度,不得简单以“工作离不开”为理由人为设限。 为确保这项工作有序推进、取得实效,该旅全面摸排干部职业发展诉求,广泛吸纳意见建议,制订推行《加强年轻军官队伍激励关怀的措施》,鲜明立起“多岗历练、择优任用”导向,在保证各项工作连续性的同时,进行大范围人员调整,激活干部队伍“一池春水”。 练兵场上,某连朱指导员忙得热火朝天。训练间隙,他与战士围坐在一起,通过聊天摸清大家思想底数。这名干劲十足的基层主官,不久前还是一名业务精湛的机关干部。下连任职以来,他快速转变角色、融入连队,并在旅里组织的政治教员比武中勇夺第一名。 “之前由于缺乏基层主官经历,我几次错失晋升机会。如今旅党委提供了多岗位锻炼平台,我一定不辜负组织的信任与培养。”朱指导员说,看到成长进步有了更多盼头,如今他浑身充满干劲。 某连干部杨欢是个“老基层”,仅在排长岗位就干了5年,一度对未来之路感到迷茫。调入机关后,他很快得到了证明自己的机会——参加集团军参谋业务比武,并获得佳绩。 “加快干部流动,并不是简单的机关与基层互换岗位,而是科学统筹、体系推进。”该旅机关冯干事介绍,针对非主战连队干部因专业限制发展路径较窄、一些岗位存在任职资格约束等情况,旅里制订年轻干部成长办法、优秀基层干部优先任用等措施,推动主战连与非主战连、指挥管理与专业技术、军事与政工等不同岗位、不同专业、不同领域的人员流动,让干部队伍建设焕发新活力、展现新气象。 某营助理工程师赵琰,此前担任某连指导员,计算机专业科班出身的他,一直希望调整到专业技术岗位工作。旅党委综合考虑个人职业发展和部队建设需要,批准了他的转岗申请。如今,赵琰全身心投入旅队AI赋能战斗力建设课题研究,已取得多项成果。 走开机关和基层干部双向交流的路子,受益的是干部个人和单位建设,承压的却是该旅党委一班人。记者了解到,部分基层主官调整至机关担任科长后,面临缺乏相关经验、不熟悉机关业务等实际。对此,该旅领导主动靠前,手把手传授呈文办会等技能,帮助他们尽快提升能力、适应岗位。 “把不便留给自己,把机会留给部属。”前些天,在树立和践行正确政绩观学习教育专题分析会上,该旅党委一班人以第一季度干部调整为案例,分析纠正以往工作中存在的思想偏差,进一步廓清模糊认识,总结经验教训。得知这些新调整岗位的干部履新之后勇挑重担、主动作为,该旅领导对此前的决定感到欣慰。 记者手记 用人不能图“顺手” 育才当为长远计 ■张科进 年轻干部队伍活力不足的问题,并非只在该旅存在,记者下基层采访,时常听到官兵反映。一个重要原因,是一些单位领导以“工作离不开”为由,把年轻干部“绑定”在一个岗位上,对正常的交流任职、送学培训等人为设限。 出现这一问题,说到底是政绩观出现了偏差。少数领导只管自己任内“风平浪静”,用人只图自己“顺手”,不仅导致干部队伍建设出现“板结”,也让一些年轻干部因看不到前途和出路,心生迷茫,没了干劲。 流水不腐,户枢不蠹。各级党委特别是主要领导应树立和践行正确政绩观,真正从强军事业大局着眼,从干部成长和单位建设长远着想,在政策允许范围内加快干部流动,激发年轻干部活力,帮助他们在多个岗位经风雨、见世面、壮筋骨、长才干,早日成长为可堪大用、能担重任的栋梁之材。