← Daily Brief
Modernization Political Work

Establishing and Practicing the Correct Outlook on Political Achievement | Diving Deep at the Source of Science, Cultivating the Fertile Soil of Innovation

树立和践行正确政绩观丨在科学源头沉潜 向创新沃土深耕
PLA Daily (解放军报) 17 May 2026
View original source ↗
The Academy of Military Medical Sciences under the PLA Academy of Military Sciences has restructured its scientific research evaluation and funding mechanisms to prioritize long-cycle basic research over short-term, paper-driven outputs, explicitly framing the shift as serving combat effectiveness and warfighting readiness. The report signals an institutional effort to address a recognized vulnerability—dependence on foreign biotechnology and insufficient foundational research—by insulating researchers from short-term performance pressure through multi-year dedicated funding, exception-based promotions, and revised assessment criteria. The emphasis on self-reliance in core technologies that 'cannot be bought or begged for' reflects broader PLA efforts to indigenize military-relevant science in domains, including biomedicine and AI-assisted toxicology, where foreign access has been blocked.

The Academy of Military Medical Sciences under the Academy of Military Sciences Strengthens Basic Research Through the Correct Outlook on Political Achievement (正确政绩观): Diving Deep at the Source of Science, Cultivating the Fertile Soil of Innovation

Editor's Note: Chairman Xi has pointed out that basic research is the source of the entire scientific system and the master switch for all technological problems. We must strengthen basic research with greater force and more substantive measures, enhance our country's capacity for original innovation, and further consolidate the foundation for building a science and technology powerhouse. In recent years, the Academy of Military Medical Sciences under the Academy of Military Sciences has established and practiced the correct outlook on political achievement (正确政绩观). By building and improving institutional mechanisms, increasing investment in basic research, and guiding scientific researchers to overcome the tendency toward seeking quick results and instant benefits (急功近利), and with the perseverance and resolve of "willingly sitting on the cold bench for ten years" (板凳甘坐十年冷), researchers have devoted themselves wholeheartedly to basic research. This has resulted in breakthroughs in multiple frontier research topics and has powerfully driven the high-quality conversion and application of military medical research achievements.

PLA Daily Report by Wang Di and reporter Jia Qilong: "If it were not for the institute party committee's long-term emphasis on basic research, I could not have achieved what I have today." Not long ago, a key research project led by the director of a certain laboratory at the Academy of Military Medical Sciences under the Academy of Military Sciences successfully passed its phased review after five years of sustained effort. This is a microcosm of the institute's work to establish and practice the correct outlook on political achievement (正确政绩观), guiding researchers to abandon the mindset of seeking quick results and instant benefits (急功近利) and to devote themselves to basic research.

For a long period in the past, influenced by factors such as assessment and evaluation mechanisms, some researchers at the institute tended to choose projects with short cycles and quick results, while paying insufficient attention to basic research with long cycles and slow results. "The mission of military medical research is to serve combat effectiveness. Without solid basic research as a foundation, practical application becomes water without a source and a tree without roots." The institute's leadership told the reporter that the institute party committee clearly put forward the position of "correcting the outlook on political achievement to serve combat readiness and warfighting, and focusing the center of gravity of scientific research on basic research." Starting from institutional mechanisms, they revised and improved the scientific research performance evaluation methods, making clear that basic research projects would no longer be judged simply by the number of papers or project funding, but would instead focus on assessing originality, forward-looking vision, and potential contribution to the generation of combat effectiveness. They established a mechanism giving priority investment to basic research, with focused support for emerging interdisciplinary topics closely related to the future battlefield, set up special funds, and provided stable funding over multiple years to relieve researchers of concerns about the future.

Researcher Li, who specializes in biomedicine and antiviral immunity, had not published a single paper in several years. "In the past, I would have been unable to sit still long ago," Researcher Li explained. The institute party committee established the orientation of scientific research serving warfighting (科研为战), not using short-term results as the measuring standard, which gave him a "reassurance pill" (定心丸). After long-term research and repeated experimentation, the pathogen rapid identification and intelligent classification system led by him achieved progress.

A certain biotechnology had long been subject to blockade and could not be introduced from abroad. The institute party committee, with an eye toward national strategic needs, assembled a multidisciplinary team and, with the spirit of "sharpening a sword for ten years" (十年磨一剑), pooled their wisdom for a concentrated assault and achieved a major breakthrough. "Core technology cannot be bought or begged for; it must rely on self-reliance and self-strengthening, diving deep at the source of science and cultivating the fertile soil of innovation," the institute leadership said. Conducting scientific research certainly requires the spirit of hammering nails—striking one blow after another—but choosing where to hammer is equally important. Over the years, they have laid out a number of basic research projects in more than ten key fields including biomedicine, planting "seeds" for independent innovation in frontier military medical technology.

In scientific research and innovation, talent comes first. Upon learning that a young researcher in a certain laboratory had conceived the idea of using artificial intelligence to assist toxicological analysis, the institute leadership gave strong support. After achieving major results, this researcher was entrusted with important responsibilities and was promoted to researcher rank through an exception to normal procedures (破格晋升). The reporter learned that, in order to encourage young researchers to devote themselves to basic research, the institute implements stratified and categorized evaluation of talent (人才分层分类评价) and the "three priorities" (三优先) of mentorship, project approval, and funding guarantee, with policy preferences in professional title assessment, position promotion, and other areas. At the same time, a mechanism for sustained support of basic research was established to ensure that major basic research continues "from one cohort to the next" (一茬接着一茬干) without interruption due to personnel changes. In recent years, a cohort of young research backbones at the institute has emerged in the field of basic research, becoming a new force in military medical innovation.

The more upright the outlook on political achievement (政绩观), the purer the scientific research ecosystem. Today, on the front lines of research at the institute, what people discuss more is "which research direction may achieve an original breakthrough" and "which topic is more valuable for advancing the improvement of troop combat effectiveness." Nurtured by their painstaking efforts, a number of basic research topics at the institute focused on the frontier and aimed at the future continue to advance, and multiple major achievements have been converted and applied to troop training and combat readiness practice, injecting powerful momentum into the innovative development of our military's military medicine.

Original Chinese
军事科学院军事医学研究院以正确政绩观加强基础研究 在科学源头沉潜 向创新沃土深耕 编者按习主席指出,基础研究是整个科学体系的源头,是所有技术问题的总机关。要以更大力度、更实举措加强基础研究,提升我国原始创新能力,进一步打牢科技强国建设根基。近年来,军事科学院军事医学研究院树立和践行正确政绩观,通过建立健全制度机制,加大基础研究投入,引导科研人员克服急功近利倾向,以“板凳甘坐十年冷”的恒心定力,心无旁骛深耕基础研究,成功取得多个前沿课题研究突破,有力推动军事医学科研成果高质量转化应用。 解放军报讯 王迪、记者贾启龙报道:“要不是院党委长期注重基础研究,我不可能取得今天的成绩。”前不久,军事科学院军事医学研究院某室伯主任领衔的一项重点课题,历经5年攻关,顺利通过阶段性评审。这是该院树立和践行正确政绩观,引导科研人员摒弃急功近利思想、深耕基础研究的一个缩影。 过去很长一段时间,受考核评价机制等因素影响,该院一些科研人员倾向于选择周期短、见效快的项目,而对周期长、见效慢的基础研究关注不够。“军事医学研究的使命是服务战斗力。没有扎实的基础研究作支撑,实践应用就成了无源之水、无本之木。”该院领导告诉记者,院党委鲜明提出“把政绩观归正到服务备战打仗上来,把科研重心聚焦到基础研究上来”,从制度机制入手,修订完善科研绩效评价办法,明确基础研究类项目不再简单以论文数量、项目经费论英雄,而是着重考察其原创性、前瞻性和对战斗力生成的潜在贡献;建立基础研究优先投入机制,重点扶持与未来战场密切相关的新兴交叉学科课题,设立专项基金,持续多年给予稳定投入,为科研人员免除后顾之忧。 专攻生物医学与抗病毒免疫的李研究员,数年未发表一篇论文。“这要是以前,我早就坐不住了。”李研究员介绍,院党委树立科研为战导向,不以一时成果作为衡量标准,给自己吃了一颗“定心丸”。经过长期研究、反复试验,他领衔的病原体快速识别与智能鉴定系统取得进展。 某生物技术长期受到封锁,无法从国外引进。该院党委着眼国家战略需求组建多学科团队,以“十年磨一剑”的精神集智攻关,获得重大突破。“核心技术买不来,也求不到,必须依靠自立自强,在科学源头沉潜,向创新沃土深耕。”院领导说,搞科研固然需要钉钉子精神,一锤接着一锤敲,但选择往哪儿钉同样重要。这些年,他们在生物医药等10余个重点领域布局了一批基础研究项目,为军事医学前沿技术自主创新埋下“种子”。 科研创新,人才先行。得知某室一名年轻科研人员萌生利用人工智能辅助毒理解析的想法,院领导给予大力支持。取得重大成果后,这名科研人员被委以重任,破格晋升为研究员。记者了解到,为鼓励青年科研人员投身基础研究,该院实行人才分层分类评价和导师帮带、课题立项、经费保障“三优先”,在职称评定、职务晋升等方面给予政策倾斜。同时,建立基础研究接续支持机制,确保重大基础研究“一茬接着一茬干”,不因人员变动出现中断。近年来,该院一批青年科研骨干在基础研究领域崭露头角,成为军事医学创新的生力军。 政绩观越端正,科研生态越纯正。如今,在该院科研一线,大家谈论更多的是“哪个研究方向可能取得原创性突破”“哪个课题对推动部队战斗力提升更有价值”。在他们的心血浇灌下,该院一批聚焦前沿、瞄准未来的基础研究课题持续推进,多项重大成果转化应用于部队练兵备战实践,为我军军事医学创新发展注入强劲动能。