China Mil Watch Mandarin-source monitoring · Chinese military & security reporting
Independent monitor
Official PRC military media, read in the original
← Daily Brief
Political Work

Commemorating the 90th Anniversary of the Victory of the Chinese Workers' and Peasants' Red Army's Long March | Crossing the "Formidable Barrier" Again — Passing the Torch and Setting Out Anew

纪念中国工农红军长征胜利90周年丨"天险"重飞渡 接力再出发
PLA Daily (解放军报) 20 August 2026
View original source ↗
On the 90th anniversary of the Long March's conclusion, PLA Daily ran a full-page feature on the 82nd Group Army's 'Model Company for Forcing a Crossing of the Wu River,' built around the company's 2017 equipment overhaul and a recent Central Plains live-force confrontation exercise in which Company Commander Huang Shifeng improvised a mechanized bridge crossing after Blue Force destroyed the objective bridge. The piece documents how the company institutionalized post-restructuring retraining — converting elective subjects to mandatory, running adversarial exercises, and developing a four-step gunnery method ('搜、排、打、走') that produced a brigade-wide top ranking — framing all of it through the Maoist ideological concept of 实事求是 (seeking truth from facts). This is standard political-work content tied to a commemorative date; its value is as a record of how the 82nd Group Army's ground forces link combined-arms adaptation after the 2017 restructuring to revolutionary heritage narratives, not as evidence of a new capability or posture shift.

A Certain Brigade of the 82nd Group Army's "Model Company for Forcing a Crossing of the Wu River" —— Crossing the "Formidable Barrier" Again — Passing the Torch and Setting Out Anew

■ Song Haiwei, Pan Shida, PLA Daily Reporter Cheng Xue

Photo ①, ⑦: In front of the battle flag, the company organizes officers and soldiers to study the traditions of their predecessors. Photo ②: The company's predecessors forcing a crossing of the Wu River's formidable barrier (oil painting). Photo ③: Local residents presenting the company with a silk banner of commendation. Photo ④: During the War of Liberation, the company captured American-made equipment from the Nationalist Army. Photo ⑤: The company organizes a new-recruit induction ceremony. Photo ⑥, ⑧: Company officers and soldiers conducting training. All photos provided by the "Model Company for Forcing a Crossing of the Wu River."

**Company Profile**

The company was founded in 1925, tracing its origins to the 1st Company, 1st Battalion of the "Ye Ting Independent Regiment." During the Long March, serving as the vanguard pathfinders, 17 brave soldiers of the company were the first to break through the formidable barrier of the Wu River, winning a battle of decisive significance. In October 1936, the company was awarded the honorary title "Model Company for Forcing a Crossing of the Wu River" by the 1st Red Army Corps.

Entering the new era, the company's officers and soldiers have pursued practical warfighting and realistic combat readiness, accomplishing major missions with distinction — including cross-region exercises, international peacekeeping, and flood-relief operations. At the parade marking the 70th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China, the battle flag of the "Model Company for Forcing a Crossing of the Wu River" was honored in review. The company has successively been commended by the Theater Command Army as an "Outstanding Unit in Practicing the Goal of Strengthening the Military" and an "Advanced Grassroots Party Organization."

**Without a Breakthrough in Thinking, There Can Be No Miracle on the Battlefield**

Every year at the new-recruit induction ceremony, the "Model Company for Forcing a Crossing of the Wu River" organizes new recruits to gather before a sculpture in the company's Hall of Honor.

The bronze sculpture before them depicts Red Army soldiers crouching on bamboo rafts, water splashing high into the air, rifles pointed forward, bodies leaning ahead — as if they are about to leap off at any moment. "They are all predecessors of our company," Political Instructor Feng Xiaohan told everyone. "Back then, without their forcing a crossing of the Wu River, the subsequent victory would have been very difficult to achieve."

Turn the clock back 91 years.

January 3, 1935. The Wu River crossing at Guizhou. Several soldiers leapt onto bamboo rafts and plunged into the torrent. Bullets skimmed the water's surface from the opposite bank, throwing up columns of spray around the rafts. The soldiers on the rafts gripped their bamboo poles with all their strength while returning fire.

Suddenly, dense gunfire erupted from the flank and rear of the enemy position on the far bank. Five soldiers who had concealed themselves overnight in crevices of the cliff face burst out and tore open a gap in the enemy's defensive line.

That day, the Red Army broke through along the entire front, crossed the river smoothly through the crossing point, and reversed a desperate situation.

In truth, the real "crossing point" was not at the Wu River.

Twenty-two days earlier, at Gongcheng Academy in Tongdao County, Hunan, the Tongdao Conference was convened. Inside the room, a few chairs surrounded a wooden table spread with a map; the oil lamp on the table flickered unevenly.

The dancing flame of the oil lamp illuminated a grave face. Mao Zedong pointed at the map and put forward the idea that "Guizhou's military forces are weak — advancing westward can avoid the enemy's strong points and strike at the weak."

The meeting lasted only a little over two hours, and Mao Zedong's position won the support of the majority within the Party Central Committee. That same evening, an order marked "Most Urgently Urgent" (万万火急) was dispatched from Tongdao. Today, walking into the Tongdao Turning-Point Memorial Hall in Hunan and gazing at a reproduction of that order, this reporter can still feel the urgency of that moment: on the yellowed paper, the four characters in the upper-left corner are written in heavy ink — "Most Urgently Urgent" (万万火急) — and the body of the text drives straight to a single point: continue advancing westward on the 13th.

Those few words were the reason more than 30,000 Red Army soldiers survived. One month earlier, the Central Red Army had suffered the most devastating battle in its history at the Xiang River. After the Battle of the Xiang River, the force had been cut from 86,000 to more than 30,000; the blood of the martyrs turned the river water a dark red.

More terrifying than death was disorientation — the more than 30,000 survivors had crawled across the Xiang River covered in blood, yet did not know where to go next.

Continue northward to western Hunan to link up with the 2nd and 6th Red Army Corps? Chiang Kai-shek had long since deployed forces several times the size of the Red Army along the western Hunan line, waiting for the Red Army to walk into the trap.

At this critical juncture, the Tongdao Conference pulled the Red Army back from the edge of the cliff.

Viewed from the perspective of the entire history of the Long March, this meeting proves to be the pivotal turning point at which the Red Army moved from peril to safety. Years later, Liu Bocheng reflected in his memoirs: "At that time, if Comrade Mao Zedong had not firmly insisted on changing course, the fate of the remaining 30,000-plus Red Army soldiers would have been nothing but destruction."

The History of the Chinese People's Liberation Army assessed it this way: "Had the Red Army continued toward western Hunan, it would inevitably have been encircled and faced the danger of total annihilation."

The ideological breakthrough of seeking truth from facts ultimately opened the path to the Red Army's victory. The Red Army welcomed its "dawn" —

From the Tongdao Conference to the successful crossing of the Wu River: only 22 days.

From the successful crossing of the Wu River to the moment when the company's officers and soldiers now stand in the Hall of Honor: more than 90 years.

"Without the ideological breakthrough at the Tongdao Conference, there would have been no miracle on the Wu River battlefield afterward, and there would certainly be no company of ours today," said Feng Xiaohan.

**The Spirit of Seeking Truth from Facts Is Carried Forward in the Company**

In the heartland of the Central Plains, a live-force confrontation exercise was underway. The smoke had not yet cleared; the smell of scorched earth hung in the river valley.

Company Commander Huang Shifeng led the unit in a rapid advance, with a large bridge as the objective. Just as the lead squad approached the bridgehead, a loud explosion rang out — the middle section of the bridge had been "destroyed" by the Blue Force.

At the same moment, a small "enemy" force laid down interlocking fire with light and heavy weapons, sealing off the bridge deck. "We could also take a 20-kilometer detour through the mountains, but we might not arrive on time." Three days earlier, when the company had been drawing up contingency plans, this scenario had been considered; Platoon Leader Shi Linlin reported the detour option to him.

Huang Shifeng did not rush to order a detour. He leapt out of the armored vehicle and moved along the guardrail of the "destroyed" bridge to survey both sides of the riverbed.

"Cross the river using the resources at hand!" After careful assessment, Huang Shifeng issued his order: "1st Squad, flank through the woods on the right and provide fire cover; the engineer detachment moves forward to bridge the gap and ensure vehicles can pass." Before long, a simple mechanized bridge was erected. The unit filed across and entered the designated area on schedule. When the exercise ended, Huang Shifeng removed his helmet and looked at the completed bridge with feeling: "When our company's predecessors were at the Wu River back then, they didn't even have wooden planks — all they had were small bamboo rafts."

At the after-action review, a yellowed hand-drawn map of the Wu River operation appeared on the screen behind Huang Shifeng. The hand-drawn map contained no precise survey data; the contour lines had been drawn by scouts measuring distances on foot.

"Our predecessors had none of today's advanced vehicle-mounted radios or engineering equipment," Huang Shifeng said, pointing to the map. "But they had one skill — seeking truth from facts in assessing the terrain, the enemy, and themselves, and finding solutions from actual conditions."

Different times, the same spirit. The spirit of seeking truth from facts has been carried forward in the company ever since.

On the northeastern battlefield in 1948, facing Nationalist Army forces far superior in numbers, the company did not rigidly hold its pre-assigned positions. After on-the-ground reconnaissance, they adopted a dispersed defensive posture, repelling enemy assaults time and again, ultimately capturing more than 30 prisoners and seizing a large quantity of equipment. After the battle, the Northeast Field Army headquarters awarded the company the title "Heroic Company." On the day the flag was presented, company predecessor Shi Xueyi stood before the formation and said: "The positions marked on the map are fixed; the positions walked out on foot are alive."

That year, Platoon Leader Jiang Heng participated in an international peacekeeping skills competition. Before the competition, he studied and analyzed the characteristics of 21 teams from 15 countries one by one, and targeted his preparation to fill specific gaps. In the end, he achieved perfect scores in all seven assessment events.

On the evening after the exercise concluded, the company bivouacked in the field. Huang Shifeng sat beside an armored vehicle cleaning his weapon; several young soldiers gathered around and asked him why he had not followed the detour route in the contingency plan.

"The contingency plan was drawn up three days ago. Using the situation from three days ago to deal with today's circumstances — that's not fighting a war," Huang Shifeng continued. "Our company's old tradition, starting from the 17 heroes who crossed the river, has always recognized one truth — seeking truth from facts (实事求是). Those four words are not a slogan; they mean that no matter when, if you face a situation that does not match reality, you must dare to say 'no.'"

The night was very still. Huang Shifeng assembled his weapon, worked the bolt, and the metallic clack carried far into the distance.

**You Cannot Aim at Today's Target with Yesterday's Sights**

In 2017, the company relocated as a complete unit. The company had to contend not only with the move to a new garrison, but also with a transformation of its combat system: after the relocation, the company's primary weapon systems were entirely replaced, tactics and methods were rebuilt from scratch, and even cutting-edge concepts of unmanned combat had entered the company's practical combat research — when "today's coordinates" could not be found on "yesterday's map," the company's officers and soldiers could not aim at today's targets with yesterday's sights.

The first to feel this "growing pain" was Wu Jinhong, the company's infantry fighting vehicle gunnery technician.

"Operations I could have done with my eyes closed were completely useless in the face of the new equipment." Confronted with entirely updated fire-control parameters, Wu Jinhong's painstakingly developed "muscle memory" had become a shackle on his progress.

In response, Wu Jinhong approached the task like a newly enlisted recruit, learning from scratch step by step. Through countless hands-on trials, he developed a four-step gunnery method: "search, sort, shoot, shift" (搜、排、打、走). This method, derived from practical training and exercises, helped gunners react faster and shoot more accurately. In a subsequent brigade gunnery assessment, all 13 of the company's gunners achieved excellent ratings, placing first overall.

At the rear support position, Liu Feng, an armored vehicle technician with more than 20 years of service, similarly refused to "go by feel" when faced with new equipment of a completely different design. He worked from technical drawings, breaking down principles and comparing differences, studying every potential fault point as if dissecting a specimen. "Equipment maintenance tolerates no empiricism — whatever the problem is, you solve it by the method appropriate to that problem; you absolutely cannot rely on old instincts to muddle through," Liu Feng often told his younger comrades.

Aiming at today's targets, the company proceeded from new actual conditions, summarizing new patterns and seeking new methods.

To enhance combat effectiveness, the company Party branch consistently applied "three dissatisfactions" (三个不满足) in military training: not satisfied with the established standards of the training syllabus — converting some elective training subjects into mandatory ones and integrating actual combat requirements into daily training; not satisfied with only a few top performers standing out — using mutual-aid groups to fill the gaps of every soldier; not satisfied with conventional training organization models — using exercises to organize adversarial training and conducting after-action reviews to develop new tactics and training methods.

This approach of "seeking hardship voluntarily" ultimately produced hard combat power on the battlefield. In 2018, after completing a high-intensity 40-kilometer load-bearing movement, the company's officers and soldiers were the first to "break through the enemy" in the confrontation; in 2020, during an evaluative exercise, the company's gunners set a record of 100% hit rate… Each of these results is the most powerful response to the principle of "train the way you fight."

Standing at the intersection of past and future, the officers and soldiers of the "Model Company for Forcing a Crossing of the Wu River" have always kept clear heads: only by proceeding from objective reality and continuously recalibrating their "sights" can they steadily strike the "bullseye" of victory on the rapidly changing future battlefield.

---

**Why Did the Wu River Not Become a Second Xiang River**

■ PLA Daily Reporter Cheng Xue

The Xiang River and the Wu River — both were formidable barriers on the Long March route, yet they led to entirely different historical outcomes.

The Battle of the Xiang River, which erupted at the end of November 1934, was the most devastating battle the Central Red Army fought during the Long March. After that battle, Red Army numbers plummeted sharply, and the surface of the Xiang River was covered with the bodies of martyrs. To this day, the local saying still circulates: "For three years, do not drink the water of the Xiang River; for ten years, do not eat the fish of the Xiang River." The price paid in blood proved that mechanically executing "Left"-deviationist dogmatism — disregarding objective reality and forcing a breakthrough through enemy lines held in strength — could only drive the Red Army toward annihilation.

Just over a month later, the Red Army faced the formidable barrier of the Wu River. The Wu River's current was swift and turbulent; both banks were sheer cliffs. Chiang Kai-shek's forces were in close pursuit, attempting to turn the Wu River into a second Xiang River. Yet this time, the catastrophe was not repeated. In early 1935, the Central Red Army split into three columns and forced a crossing of the Wu River, leaving the Nationalist "pursuit and suppression forces" stranded east and south of the river.

The Wu River did not become a second Xiang River — what changed was not only the battlefield situation, but a fundamental ideological line.

From the Xiang River to the Wu River, the turning point in between began with seeking truth from facts. Through the practice of blood and fire, the broad ranks of commanders and soldiers gradually came to understand that without seeking truth from facts, no amount of heroic sacrifice could bring victory. Gazing at this period of history, a series of conferences bore witness to the formation of the ideological line of seeking truth from facts:

On December 12, 1934, at the Tongdao Conference, Mao Zedong, proceeding from the actual enemy situation and seeking truth from facts, argued forcefully that the Red Army should avoid the enemy's strong points and strike at the weak, turning westward into Guizhou to establish a new base area where enemy forces were relatively thin; on December 18, 1934, the Liping Conference formally adopted this position, abandoning the original plan to link up with the 2nd and 6th Red Army Corps; from December 31, 1934 to January 1, 1935, the Houchang Conference again rejected the erroneous insistence of Bo Gu and Li De on proceeding to western Hunan, and resolved to force a crossing of the Wu River and seize Zunyi… As Party history experts have noted, from the Tongdao Conference to the Liping Conference, the Houchang Conference, and then the Zunyi Conference, these meetings were linked one to the next, forming the chain of a great turning point in the Party's history. And the core of that chain was precisely these four words: "seeking truth from facts" (实事求是).

Seeking truth from facts was not only a matter of strategic direction, but also of tactical adjustment in response to changing enemy conditions. Arriving at the Wu River crossing, the Red Army did not act recklessly — Geng Biao, then commander of the 4th Regiment of the 1st Red Army Corps' 1st Army Corps, conducted on-the-ground reconnaissance and discovered that the fortifications on the main road at the crossing were strong but that the small path upstream was poorly guarded. He therefore employed a feint-and-strike approach during the forced crossing, cleverly breaking through the formidable barrier.

The defeat at the Xiang River and the victory at the Wu River — separated by a single river, two different fates. They tell us: respecting objective laws and persisting in seeking truth from facts is the only way out of a desperate situation; to deviate from this line is to move toward the opposite of one's intentions, no matter how worthy the vision. This is not only the lesson the Long March imparts to us, but also the law governing the rise and fall of any endeavor.

---

**When There Is a Burden, the Cadres Carry It on Their Shoulders**

■ Political Instructor of the "Model Company for Forcing a Crossing of the Wu River," Feng Xiaohan

Push open the door of the company's Hall of Honor, and a carrying pole (扁担) sits in a prominent position in the display case. The bamboo wood has been worn to a shine, and three characters are carved into the middle of the pole: "Zhu De's" (朱德记).

Winter of 1928, Jinggang Mountains. The 4th Red Army had just established a foothold when the enemy closed in from all sides, throwing up layer upon layer of blockades in an attempt to starve the Red Army out in the mountains.

Food grew scarcer by the day; some soldiers were so hungry they could barely hold their rifles steady. To solve the food problem, Zhu De, then commander of the 4th Red Army, took the lead by picking up a carrying pole and leading the unit down the mountain to haul grain. From the Jinggang Mountains to Ninggang, the mountain paths were steep; in some places along the way, loose rocks tumbled down, and a moment's inattention could send a person sliding into a deep ravine. Zhu De hauled grain by day, and at night returned to study the enemy situation and deploy operations, often working at his desk until past midnight, then rising before dawn to set out again.

The soldiers felt for him and wanted him to rest; they quietly hid his carrying pole. When Zhu De found out, he did not lose his temper — he simply found a new length of bamboo, fashioned it into a carrying pole, and carved his name on it again, neatly and squarely.

After that day, no one hid his carrying pole again — but every person in the unit gripped their own pole more tightly. And so, under Zhu De's leadership, they carried grain load by load, hauling out a supply line and hauling out a lifeline for the base area.

In truth, what lay behind the carrying pole was far more than a route for transporting grain. After the Jinggang Mountains rendezvous in 1928, the 4th Red Army had only recently been established, and some within it still carried the habits of the old armies — some were given to empty talk, some sought the easy way out. Zhu De set an example through his own conduct, using a single carrying pole to tell everyone: cadres cannot carry out their work by sitting in rooms issuing orders; they must stand at the very front of the ranks, bleeding and sweating.

In the decades that followed, this force marched from the Jinggang Mountains to northern Shaanxi, and from northern Shaanxi across the whole country — sustained by this "carrying-pole spirit" (扁担精神): whenever there was hardship, the cadres stood at the front; whenever there was a burden, the cadres carried it on their shoulders.

Looking across the entire course of the Long March, this "carrying-pole spirit" was put to a severe test in the aftermath of the Battle of the Xiang River.

Facing an unprecedented blow, many commanders debated whether to continue northward to western Hunan as originally planned. At the critical moment, an emergency meeting inside Tongdao County, Hunan, went deep into the night, and "turning westward into Guizhou to avoid the powerful enemy" ultimately became the consensus; a few days later, the Liping Conference further rejected the impractical plan of fighting head-on…

Gazing at these two meetings, Party member cadres carried the burden on their shoulders — carrying the direction of survival for an entire army. Comrade Mao Zedong dared to stand up and repudiate the erroneous line, blazing a new path and wrenching the fate of tens of thousands from the jaws of destruction.

Today, that carrying pole still rests quietly on display in the company's Hall of Honor. Standing before it, I seem to still see that figure from long ago — on a mountain path, Zhu De dressed in a gray cloth military uniform, a heavy bamboo carrying pole pressing down on his shoulders, yet his steps steady and sure. Those who came after walk the same road forward; the carrying pole on their shoulders has been replaced by a steel rifle, the mountain path has become a training ground, but the heavy weight on those shoulders has not diminished by a single ounce.

---

**My Home Is at Chashan Pass**

■ Junior Sergeant of the "Model Company for Forcing a Crossing of the Wu River," Qian Fadong

My hometown is Chashan Pass (茶山关) in Zunyi, Guizhou, and the Wu River runs right past my front door.

As a child, I always heard the elders point to the river and say: "Back then, the Red Army crossed from right here."

In early 1935, the advance force of the 3rd Red Army Corps arrived at the Wu River crossing at Chashan Pass. On the far bank, the enemy had long since built defensive works along the river, set up machine guns to seal off the river surface, and had all the boats at the crossing loaded with sand and sunk to the bottom of the river, vainly hoping to hold the natural barrier to the last.

The river current was swift and icy cold, and the far bank was heavily defended — yet the Red Army forced a crossing of the turbulent Wu River. The river defense that the Nationalists had painstakingly constructed quickly collapsed.

This battle was an important link in the Red Army's breakthrough of the Wu River defensive line. After the battle, the villagers of Chashan collected and buried the Red Army soldiers who had fallen. Later, the government erected a monument to the Red Army martyrs at the entrance to Chashan Village.

In 2024, I enlisted. When new recruits were assigned to their units, I learned that I had been placed in the "Model Company for Forcing a Crossing of the Wu River." Back then, the company's predecessors had also fought at the Wu River, forcing a crossing from a different point along the river.

On my first day in the company, the political instructor led us into the Hall of Honor. An old map hung on the wall, with several crossing points along the Wu River clearly marked. I spotted the three characters "Chashan Pass" (茶山关) at a glance, felt a surge of warmth in my chest, and stood before the map for a long time without being able to say a word.

Now I am one of the company's infantry fighting vehicle gunners, learning from my predecessors to stand watch at my battle station. During one live-fire exercise, as I was searching for targets in the turret, the vehicle suddenly lurched violently, the gun barrel became unsteady, and the target disappeared from the sight. I quickly stood up to search for the target again; moving too abruptly, I slammed my nose hard against the equipment, and blood immediately poured out.

I had no time to wipe it away. I gritted my teeth, reacquired the target, aimed, and fired — every subsequent round hit. "Why didn't you call a halt at the time?" After the mission ended, a comrade asked me while helping wipe away the blood from my nose. "Back then at the Wu River, the Red Army's predecessors never stopped in the face of the enemy's hail of bullets and shells. If they had stopped, the entire battle might have turned out differently," I answered.

On a home leave that year, I went again to the Red Army Martyrs' Monument at the entrance to the village. Before my eyes, the monument was the same monument — but I, standing before it, had grown a great deal since before I enlisted. I stood there for a long time, thinking of the map in the Hall of Honor, thinking of the days I had spent sweating in the barracks, and thinking above all of the Red Army predecessors who had fought so bravely on that battlefield long ago.

The Wu River still runs swift and turbulent; the Red Army Martyrs' Monument stands quietly; and I, too, will continue to strive hard for the cause of strengthening the military.

---

*Layout design: Fang Han, Yang Lei*

*PLA Daily, August 20, 2026, Page 7. Graphic design: Yang Lei*

Original Chinese
第82集团军某旅“强渡乌江模范连”—— “天险”重飞渡 接力再出发 ■宋海伟 潘世达 解放军报记者 程 雪 图①、⑦:战旗前,连队组织官兵学习先辈传统。图②:连队先辈强渡乌江天险(油画)。图③:群众赠送连队锦旗。图④:解放战争期间,连队缴获国民党军美式装备。图⑤:连队组织新兵入连仪式。图⑥、⑧:连队官兵正在进行训练。以上均由“强渡乌江模范连”提供 连队名片 该连诞生于1925年,前身为“叶挺独立团”1营1连。长征途中,作为开路尖兵,该连17名勇士率先突破乌江天险,打了一场具有决定意义的胜利之战。1936年10月,该连被红一军团授予“强渡乌江模范连”荣誉称号。 进入新时代,连队官兵求实为战、务实备战,出色完成跨区演训、国际维和、抗洪抢险等重大任务。庆祝新中国成立70周年阅兵式上,“强渡乌江模范连”战旗光荣受阅。连队先后被战区陆军表彰为“践行强军目标标兵单位”和“先进基层党组织”。 没有思想上的突围,就不会有战场上的奇迹 每年新兵入连仪式,“强渡乌江模范连”都会组织新兵们来到荣誉室内的一座雕塑前。 眼前的那尊青铜雕塑中,红军战士们半蹲在竹筏上,水花溅到半空,枪口朝前,身体前倾,像是下一秒就要跳出去。“他们都是我连先辈,当年,如果没有他们强渡乌江,就很难有后来的胜利。”指导员冯小涵对大家说。 把时间往前推91年。 1935年1月3日,贵州乌江渡口。几名战士跳上竹筏,冲进激流。子弹贴着水面从对岸打过来,在竹筏边炸出一朵朵水柱。筏上的战士一边死死抓住竹篙,一边举枪还击。 突然,对岸敌阵地侧后方响起密集的枪声。5名前一晚潜藏在悬崖裂缝中的战士猛扑出来,把敌军防线撕开一道口子。 当天,红军全线突破,通过渡口顺利过江,逆转了危局。 事实上,真正的“渡口”,不在乌江。 22天前,湖南通道县恭城书院,通道会议在这里召开。屋内,几把椅子围着一张木桌,木桌上铺着一张地图,桌上的马灯忽明忽暗。 马灯跳动的火苗映照着一张严肃的面孔。毛泽东指着地图,提出了“贵州兵力空虚,西进可以避实击虚”的构想。 会议只开了两个多小时,毛泽东的意见在党中央得到了多数人的赞同。当晚,一份“万万火急”的电令从通道发出。今天,走进湖南通道转兵纪念馆,凝望这份电令的复制件,记者仍能感受到当时的紧急:泛黄的纸张上,左上角的4个字墨迹很重——“万万火急”,正文直指一个核心:明十三日继续西进。 这几个字,是红军3万余人活下来的理由。1个月前,中央红军在湘江边遭遇了建军以来最惨烈的一战。湘江战役后,8.6万人锐减到3万余人,烈士的鲜血把江水染成暗红色。 比死更可怕的是迷茫——活下来的3万余人浑身是血地爬过湘江,却不知道下一步该往哪走。 继续北上湘西,与红二、红六军团会师?蒋介石早就在湘西沿线布下数倍于红军的兵力,只等红军上门。 危急关头,通道会议拉回了悬崖边的红军。 如果将这场会议放到纵观整个长征历史的视角凝望,会发现它是红军转危为安的关键节点。多年后,刘伯承在回忆录中这样感叹:“当时,如果不是毛主席坚决主张改变方针,所剩3万多红军的前途只有毁灭。” 《中国人民解放军军史》这样评价:“红军如果继续往湘西去,势必陷于重围,面临全军覆没的危险。” 实事求是的思想突围,最终打开了红军走向胜利的通道。红军迎来了“破晓”—— 从通道会议到顺利通过乌江,中间只有22天。 从顺利通过乌江到此刻连队官兵站在荣誉室,中间隔了90多年。 “没有通道会议中的思想突围,就不会有后来乌江战场上的奇迹,更不会有咱们今天的连队。”冯小涵说。 实事求是的精神,在连队赓续传承 中原腹地,一场实兵对抗演训正在进行。硝烟未散,河谷里弥漫着焦土的味道。 连长黄世锋带领大家疾进,目标直指一座大桥。先头班刚抵近桥头时,听到一声巨响——大桥中段被蓝军“炸毁”。 同一时刻,小股“敌人”以轻重火力交叉射击,封锁桥面。“还可以多走20公里山路绕行,但可能无法按时抵达。”3天前,连队在做预案时曾考虑过这个情况,排长石林林向他汇报绕行建议。 黄世锋没有急着下命令绕行。他跃出装甲车,贴着被“炸断”的大桥护栏向河道两侧察看。 “立足现有条件渡河!”仔细研判后,黄世锋下达命令:“一班绕行右侧树林进行火力掩护,工兵分队前出架桥,保障车辆通过。”很快,一座简易机械化桥架通了。部队鱼贯而过,按时进入预定地域。训练结束,黄世锋摘下钢盔,望着架好的桥感叹:“连队先辈当年在乌江,连木板都没有,他们只有小小的竹筏。” 复盘会上,黄世锋身后的屏幕上出现了一张泛黄的乌江作战手绘地图。手绘地图上没有精确的测绘数据,等高线是靠侦察兵用双脚步测画出的。 “先辈们没有今天先进的车载电台和工程器材。”黄世锋指向地图接着说,“但他们有一样本事——实事求是地看地形、看敌人、看自己,从实际出发找办法。” 不同的时空,相同的样子。实事求是的精神,从那时起便在连队延续下来。 1948年东北战场,面对兵力远超我方的国民党军,连队没有死守预设阵地。实地勘察后,他们采用分散布防的打法,一次次挫败敌军冲锋,最终俘敌30余人,缴获大批装备。战后,东北野战军总部授予连队“英雄连”称号。授旗那天,连队先辈史学义站在队列前说:“地图上标注的阵地是死的,用脚走出来的阵地是活的。” 那年,排长姜恒参加国际维和技能竞赛。他在赛前逐一研究分析15个国家21支参赛队伍的特点,针对性补齐短板,最终7项考核全部获得满分成绩。 此次演训结束当晚,连队宿营野外。黄世锋坐在装甲车旁擦枪,几个年轻战士围过来问他“今天为什么不走预案上的绕行路线”。 “预案是3天前定的,拿3天前的情况应付今天的事,那不叫打仗。”黄世锋接着说,“咱们连的老传统,是从渡江17勇士开始就认准一个道理——实事求是。这4个字不是什么口号,是无论何时,面对不符合实际的情况要敢说‘不’。” 夜很静,黄世锋把枪组装好,拉了拉枪栓,金属的撞击声传出去很远。 不能用过去的准星瞄准今天的靶子 2017年,连队整建制移防。连队不仅要面对营盘搬迁,更要面对作战体系的转型:移防后,连队主战装备全面换型,战术战法推倒重来,甚至前沿的无人作战概念也已进入连队的实战化研究视野……当“昨天的地图”上找不到“今天的坐标”,连队官兵就不能用过去的准星瞄准今天的靶子。 最先感受到这种“阵痛”的,是连队步兵战车射击技师吴金洪。 “过去闭着眼都能完成的操作,在新装备面前彻底失灵了。”面对全部更新的火炮瞄准参数,吴金洪曾经千锤百炼的“肌肉记忆”成了进步的桎梏。 对此,吴金洪像一个刚入伍的新兵,一点一滴从头学起。经过千百次的实操摸索,他总结出“搜、排、打、走”射击四步法。这套源自实战实训的方法,帮助射手反应更快、打得更准。在随后的一次旅射击考核中,连队13名射手全部达到优秀,总评第一。 在后方保障阵地上,入伍20多年的装甲车技师刘峰,面对构造迥异的新装备,同样没有“跟着感觉走”。他对照图纸,拆解原理、比对差异,像解剖麻雀一样研究每一个可能出现的故障点。“装备保障容不得经验主义,是什么问题就按什么办法解决,绝不能凭老感觉闯关。”刘峰常常这样告诫年轻战友。 瞄准今天的靶子,连队从新的实际情况出发,总结新规律,寻找新方法。 为了提升战斗力,连队党支部坚持练兵“三个不满足”:不满足于大纲的既定标准,将部分选训课目变为必训课目,把实战要求融入日常训练;不满足于少数尖子冒尖,通过互助小组补齐每一名战士的短板;不满足于常规组训模式,依托演训组织对抗式训练,训练后总结复盘新战法训法。 这种“自讨苦吃”的做法,最终换来了战场上的硬实力。2018年,连队官兵在完成一次负重40公里的高强度机动后,率先在对抗中“破敌”;2020年,在一次检验性演训中,连队射手创下命中率100%的纪录……这一份份成绩单,是对“仗怎么打、兵就怎么练”最有力的回应。 站在过去与未来的交汇点上,“强渡乌江模范连”官兵始终头脑清醒:只有从客观实际出发,不断校准“准星”,才能在瞬息万变的未来战场上,稳稳击中制胜的“靶心”。 乌江,为何没有成为第二条湘江 ■解放军报记者 程 雪 湘江与乌江,同是长征路上的天堑,却通往截然不同的历史结局。 1934年11月底爆发的湘江战役,是中央红军在长征中损失最为惨重的一战。此战过后,红军人数锐减,湘江水面浮满烈士遗体。时至今日,当地还流传着“三年不饮湘江水,十年不食湘江鱼”的说法。血的代价证明:机械地执行“左”倾教条主义,不顾客观实际、硬闯敌军重兵布防的封锁线,只会把红军推向绝境。 仅仅一个多月后,红军面临乌江天险。乌江水流湍急,两岸是悬崖绝壁。蒋介石的大军紧追其后,企图把乌江变成第二条湘江。然而这一次,惨案没有重演。1935年初,中央红军兵分三路强渡乌江,把国民党“追剿军”甩在乌江以东和以南地区。 乌江没有成为第二条湘江——这其中,改变的不仅是战场态势,更是一条根本的思想路线。 从湘江到乌江,中间的转折始于实事求是。广大将士在血与火的实践中逐渐认识到,离开实事求是,再英勇的牺牲也换不来胜利。凝望这段历史,一连串的会议见证了实事求是思想路线的形成: 1934年12月12日,通道会议上,毛泽东根据敌情变化实事求是、据理力争,提出红军应当避实就虚、转向西进,在敌军力量比较薄弱的贵州创建新根据地;1934年12月18日,黎平会议正式采纳了这一主张,放弃与红二、六军团会合的原定计划;1934年12月31日至1935年1月1日,猴场会议再次否定了博古、李德坚持去湘西的错误主张,决定抢渡乌江、攻占遵义……正如党史专家所言,从通道会议到黎平会议、猴场会议,再到遵义会议,几场会议环环相扣,构成了党的历史上一次伟大转折的链条。而这一链条的核心,正是“实事求是”这四个字。 实事求是不只是战略层面的方向抉择,还是根据敌情变化的战术调整。行至乌江渡口,红军没有蛮干——时任红一军团红四团团长耿飚实地侦察,发现渡口的大道工事强但上游小道疏于戒备,于是在强渡时声东击西、避实就虚,巧妙突破天险。 湘江之败与乌江之胜,一江之隔,两种命运。它告诉我们:尊重客观规律、坚持实事求是,是走出困境的唯一出路;背离这条路线,愿景再好也会走向反面。这不仅是长征带给我们的启示,也是任何事业兴衰成败的法则。 有了担子,干部挑在肩上 ■“强渡乌江模范连”指导员 冯小涵 推开连队荣誉室的门,一根扁担摆在展柜中显眼的位置。扁担竹木被磨得发亮,扁担中间刻着3个字——“朱德记”。 1928年冬,井冈山上。红四军刚刚站稳脚跟,敌人便从四面合围而来,布下层层封锁,企图把红军困死在山里。 粮食一天比一天少,有的战士饿得连枪都端不稳。为解决吃饭问题,时任红四军军长朱德带头挑起扁担,领着队伍下山挑粮。从井冈山到宁冈,山路陡峭,沿途有的地方碎石滚落,稍不留神就会滑下深沟。朱德白天挑粮,夜里回来还要研究敌情、部署战事,常常伏案到后半夜,天不亮又起身出发。 战士们心疼他,想让他歇一歇,悄悄把他的扁担藏了起来。朱德知道了也不发火,自己又找了一根新竹子削成扁担,在上面重新端端正正地刻上名字。 那天以后,再没人藏他的扁担,可队伍里每个人都把自己的扁担攥得更紧了。就这样,在朱德的带领下,他们一担一担地挑出了一条补给线,挑出了一个根据地的生机。 事实上,扁担背后藏着的,远不止一条运粮的路。1928年井冈山会师后,红四军初建不久,内部一些人还带着旧军队的习气,有人爱讲空话,有人贪图省事,朱德却以身立范,用一根扁担告诉所有人:干部开展工作不能坐在屋里发号施令,而应该站在队伍最前头流血流汗。 此后几十年,这支队伍从井冈山走到陕北,从陕北走到全国,靠的就是这股“扁担精神”——但凡有了难处,干部站在前头;但凡有了担子,干部挑在肩上。 纵观长征全过程,这股“扁担精神”,在湘江战役后经受了严酷的考验。 面临空前重创,许多指挥员争论要不要按照原计划北上湘西。关键时刻,湖南通道县内一场紧急会议开到深夜,“转兵西进贵州,避开强敌”最终成为共识;几天后,黎平会议又进一步否定了不切实际的硬拼方案…… 凝望这两次会议,党员干部将担子挑在肩上,挑起了一支军队生的方向——毛泽东同志敢于站出来否定错误路线,开辟新路,把几万人的命运从绝境中硬生生地扭转过来。 如今,这根扁担还静静地陈列在连队荣誉室里。站在它面前,我仿佛还能看见当年那个身影——山路上,朱德身穿一身灰布军装,肩上压着一根沉甸甸的竹扁担,脚步却走得很稳。后辈沿着同样的路向前走,肩上的扁担换成了钢枪,山路变成了演兵场,但肩上那份沉甸甸的分量,一分都没少。 我家就在茶山关 ■“强渡乌江模范连”下士 钱发东 我的家乡在贵州遵义茶山关,家门口就是乌江。 小时候,总听老一辈的人指着江水说:“当年红军就是从这里打过去的。” 1935年初,红三军团先遣部队抵达乌江茶山关渡口。对岸,敌军早已沿江修好防御工事,架起机枪封锁江面,还把渡口所有船只装上泥沙沉入江底,妄图凭天险死守。 江水湍急冰冷,对岸又有重兵把守,可红军硬是成功渡过了这水流湍急的乌江。国民党苦心经营的江防,很快土崩瓦解。 这场战斗,是红军突破乌江防线的重要一环。战后,茶山村的乡亲们收殓安葬那些牺牲的红军战士。后来,政府又在茶山村村口,为他们修建了一座红军烈士纪念碑。 2024年,我报名参军。新兵下连时,我才知道自己被分到了“强渡乌江模范连”。当年,连队先辈也曾在乌江战斗,从另外一个渡口强渡乌江。 来到连队的第一天,指导员带我们走进荣誉室。墙上挂着一幅老地图,地图上,乌江沿线几个渡口标得清清楚楚。我一眼就看见“茶山关”3个字,心头一热,站在地图前半天说不出话。 现在,我成为连里的一名步战车炮手,也学着先辈的样子,守护好自己的战位。一次实弹射击,我在炮塔里搜索目标时,车辆突然剧烈颠簸,炮口不稳,目标从瞄准镜里消失。我赶紧站起来重新搜寻目标,由于动作太猛,鼻梁狠狠磕在装备上,鼻血一下子涌了出来。 我顾不上去擦,咬着牙重新锁定、瞄准、击发,后面几发炮弹全部命中。“当时为什么不喊停?”任务结束,战友一边帮我擦鼻血一边问我。“当年在乌江,红军先辈面对敌军的枪林弹雨都没有停下,他们要是停了,整个战役可能就不一样了。”我回答。 那次休假回家,我又来到了村口的那座红军烈士纪念碑前。眼前,碑还是那座碑,但站在碑前的我与参军前相比,已经成长了很多。我在那里站了很久,想起荣誉室里的那幅地图,想起自己在军营里挥汗如雨的时光,更想起当年战场上英勇战斗的红军先辈。 乌江水还是那样湍急,红军烈士纪念碑静静矗立,而我也将继续为强军事业努力奋斗。 版式设计:方 汉、杨 磊 《解放军报》2026年8月20日第7版制图:杨 磊