A Naval Unit Conducts Combat-Realistic Training Together with Neighboring Units
A Naval Unit Conducts Combat-Realistic Training Together with Neighboring Units — Sea-Air Coordination Pierces the "Fog"
■ Zhou Jingjie, PLA Daily Special Correspondent Hao Yongfei, Sheng Xia
In the height of summer, under a scorching sun, a warplane from a naval unit roared into the sky and headed for a designated airspace, joining neighboring surface vessel units in combined combat-realistic coordination training.
The unit's leadership introduced that, for this training exercise, they configured a scenario of "questionable target characteristics," requiring the aircrew and neighboring surface vessels to work in close coordination to conduct full-element, multi-dimensional precise verification and identification of an unidentified maritime target, in order to test and improve intelligence assessment and special-situation handling capabilities (特情处置能力) under sea-air coordination.
"Suspicious target signal detected!" After the aircraft reached cruising altitude, the aircrew's radar operator sharply picked up an anomalous signal.
"Cross-referencing the exercise-control intelligence and the recent characteristics of the 'enemy situation' — do the signal characteristics fully match?" The airborne commander did not rush to issue a handling order, but instead guided the officers and soldiers to break out of fixed thinking (固化思维) and conduct their own assessment. The aircrew, drawing on experience accumulated through daily training and reconnaissance information simultaneously fed back by the neighboring surface vessels, rapidly exchanged views and conducted multi-dimensional cross-validation.
After thorough assessment, they reached a conclusion: the target's actual characteristics differed from the vague intelligence leads initially provided by the exercise-control group, and it was likely a "deceptive signal" deliberately planted by the exercise-control group. The aircrew then simultaneously transmitted the verification results and detailed target characteristics to the neighboring surface vessels, buying valuable time for optimizing subsequent operational deployment.
"Rapid and precise assessment of intelligence information is an important component of our targeted effort to make up for coordination shortfalls and improve combat capability," the unit's leadership explained. In recent years, they have adhered to the training philosophy of "battles must be fought jointly, troops must be trained as a system (仗要联合打,兵要体系练)," focused on the pain points and difficulties in coordination training, drawn on successful experience accumulated through routine exercises and training, and explored and refined methods and approaches for conducting coordination training with neighboring surface vessel units and fighter aviation units, driving continuous improvement in training quality and effectiveness.
The battlefield situation changes in an instant. Just as the neighboring surface vessel units were adjusting their deployment and tightening their defensive posture, the real "enemy" target suddenly released powerful electromagnetic jamming, and the aircraft's radar screen instantly turned to "static," causing the atmosphere in the cockpit to grow sharply tense.
"Activate anti-jamming mode!" the airborne commander ordered decisively. Officers and soldiers at every station worked in close coordination with precise operation, employing the tactical method of "layered jamming suppression and cross-validation (分层抗扰、交叉验证)" that they had developed through independent exploration. Combined with real-time intelligence fed back by the neighboring surface vessels' radar, they conducted multi-dimensional comparison and multi-source corroboration, rapidly completing the closed-loop handling sequence of "detect — identify — jam — lock on," piercing the "fog of war (战场迷雾)," successfully acquiring the "enemy" main-force target, and simulating an intercept action.
When training concluded, an after-action review immediately commenced. The participating officers and soldiers engaged in in-depth discussion of problems in the areas of tactical method application, coordination, and emergency response, and formulated corrective measures one by one, laying a solid foundation for improving training in the next phase.