China Mil Watch Mandarin-source monitoring · Chinese military & security reporting
Independent monitor
Official PRC military media, read in the original
← Daily Brief
Political Work

Revelations from the Advanced Deeds of Wang Ji | Fleeting Fame Is Not Worth Coveting — A Pure Heart Presses Toward the Distant March

王戟先进事迹启示录丨浮名安足慕,素心向远征
PLA Daily (解放军报) 12 August 2026
View original source ↗
Wang Ji, a software engineer at the National University of Defense Technology specializing in high-assurance software technology, is held up in PLA political-work media as a model of selfless dedication after losing both legs in 2013 and continuing as chief technical expert on a key national defense software project. The article invokes his 'Role Model of the Era' (时代楷模) designation and quotes Academician Chen Huowang to frame indifference to personal fame as a professional and ideological virtue, explicitly tying that framing to Xi Jinping's directive that science and technology workers avoid 'empty glory' and personal calculation. This is standard political-work content; its value is as a record of how PLA institutional media constructs the ideal identity of defense scientists — mission-driven, self-effacing, and subordinate to national need — not as evidence of a personnel policy shift or new capability development.

"National Self-Improvement Role Model," First Prize of the Military Science and Technology Progress Award, Second Prize of the National Science and Technology Progress Award… Any one of these national- or military-level awards and honors would be enough to anchor an impressive professional record, yet Wang Ji's reaction to all of it was remarkably "muted."

When his paper was selected as an Outstanding Paper Award at the International Conference on Foundations of Software Engineering, the news arrived and Wang Ji turned straight back to the project he was working on. Even after he was later conferred the title of "Role Model of the Era" (时代楷模), with the gaze of countless people fixed upon him, he said only, with calm composure: "I am just an ordinary member of National University of Defense Technology. It is the wheelchair that has magnified my halo." This echoes the inscription his mentor, Academician Chen Huowang, once wrote for him: "Indifference to fame clarifies one's aspirations; tranquility carries one far." This reverence for honor, this detachment from fame and gain, and this composed and serene state of mind are precisely the foundations of conduct that science and technology workers in the new era must uphold.

Between name and substance — which is master and which is guest — the ancients had long seen through the matter. "Name is the guest of substance." The principle is not profound, yet how many people have inverted the order of priority, losing their original heart and their sense of proportion amid the temptations of fame and gain, single-mindedly chasing hollow reputation and empty glory, neglecting deep and earnest work, and ultimately falling into the predicament of a name that does not match reality.

People pursue fame, often because fame brings visible rewards. Yet the "niche and hard-core" (冷门硬核) track that Wang Ji chose — high-assurance software technology — is precisely where fame and gain are most scarce. Faced with questions about this, his answer was very simple: "Whether something is popular or niche is not the criterion. The needs of the nation and the military are."

To set right the relationship between name and gain is, at bottom, to resolve the question of "for whom does one seek fame, and from what does one derive gain." The front of national defense science and technology innovation has always been a place for "doing earth-shaking deeds while remaining nameless and anonymous" (干惊天动地事、做隐姓埋名人). From the forebears of the "Two Bombs, One Satellite" (两弹一星) program who took root in the Gobi Desert and concealed their identities, to the later generations who threw themselves into Tianhe, BeiDou, and high-energy laser programs and were content to endure obscurity without calculating personal gain or loss — generation after generation of national defense science and technology workers have faced the same choice. In their view, personal gain and loss are as light as floating dust; the weight of the cause is as heavy as Mount Tai.

When one's gaze is confined to the small self, one can only fret over the petty gains and losses of poverty and lowliness. Only when the heart holds the nation and the homeland does one come to understand the vastness of heaven and earth within a single bow and lift of the head. In 2013, Wang Ji underwent surgery that resulted in high bilateral lower-limb amputation. As soon as his condition improved slightly, he returned to the front line, serving as the chief technical expert for a key national defense software project. Getting around became the first obstacle standing before him. Colleagues advised him that he could simply lend his name and preside from a distance. He replied with a question: "Have you ever seen a chief expert who never leaves home and never goes on assignment?"

In terms of fame and gain, Wang Ji had long since achieved success and built his reputation — enough to spend the rest of his life with ease and dignity. In terms of illness and pain, he had even more reason to choose to step back; no one would blame a man who had lost both legs for stopping. But in Wang Ji's view, "chief expert" is not a nominal title, nor a treatment to be enjoyed. The greater the name, the heavier the responsibility. The honors above one's head and the titles on one's shoulders correspond to more exacting standards, weightier accountability, and more grounded action. Only by matching one's reputation with earnest work, and interpreting one's identity through the fulfillment of duty, can one prove worthy of the honor and worthy of the mission.

Those who chase fame find that fame often scatters with the wind; those who attend to substance find that substance achieved brings fame of its own accord. We do not oppose legitimate fame and gain, but we do oppose hollow reputation divorced from real achievement and private interest that betrays the people. The fame and gain that a Communist Party member ought to pursue should be, as with Wang Ji, fame that is "worthy of the name" (名副其实) and gain that "benefits generations to come" (利在千秋).

Chairman Xi has profoundly pointed out: "Scientific achievement cannot be separated from spiritual support" and "we must encourage science and technology workers to focus on their own scientific research endeavors, to study diligently and assiduously, to not covet empty glory, and to not calculate personal fame and gain." All Party members and cadres should take Wang Ji as a mirror, rectify their pursuit of values, truly devote their minds and energy to getting things done and building their undertakings, and strive to deliver a qualified answer sheet that is worthy of the Party, worthy of the people, and worthy of the era.

Original Chinese
“全国自强模范”、军事科学技术进步奖一等奖、国家科学技术进步奖二等奖……任意一项国家级、军队级奖项和荣誉,都足以撑起一份亮眼的职业履历,但王戟对这一切的反应出奇得“钝”。 论文被评为国际软件工程基础学术会议杰出论文奖,消息传来,王戟转身投入正在参研的项目。即便后来被授予“时代楷模”,万千目光聚于一身,他也只是淡然一句:“我只是国防科大的普通一分子,是轮椅放大了我的光环。”亦如导师陈火旺院士给他写下的赠言:“淡泊以明志,宁静而致远。”这份对荣誉的敬畏、对名利的淡泊,以及心态上的平和、恬静,正是新时代科技工作者应当坚守的立身之本。 名与实,谁主谁宾,古人早已勘破。“名者,实之宾也。”道理并不深奥,可多少人颠倒了主次,在名利诱惑中迷失本心、失却分寸,一味追逐浮名虚誉,疏于深耕实干,最终陷入名不副实的困境。 世人逐名,往往因为名能带来可见的回报。而王戟选择的高可信软件技术这条“冷门硬核”赛道,恰恰是名利最稀薄的地方。面对疑问,他的回答非常简单:“热门或冷门不是标准,国家和军队的需求才是。” 摆正名与利的关系,说到底是要解决好“为谁而名、因何而利”的问题。国防科技创新这条战线,向来是“干惊天动地事、做隐姓埋名人”的地方。从“两弹一星”的先辈们扎根戈壁、隐姓埋名,到投身天河、北斗、高能激光的后来者甘守寂寞、不计得失,一代代国防科技工作者都面临过同样的抉择。在他们看来,个人得失轻如浮尘,事业分量重如泰山。 目光拘于小我,便只能戚戚于贫贱之得失;胸怀装下家国,才懂得俯仰之间天地之宽。2013年,王戟手术后双下肢高位截肢。病情稍有好转,他便重返一线,担任某重点国防软件项目的技术首席专家。出行成了横亘在他面前的第一道坎,同事劝他挂名坐镇即可,他反问:“你们见过永远窝在家里不出差的首席吗?” 若论名利,王戟早已功成名就,足以从容体面地度过余生。若论病痛,他更有理由选择退场,没有人会责怪一个失去双腿的人停下脚步。但在王戟看来,首席不是挂名的头衔,也不是用来享受的待遇。名之愈盛,责之愈重。头顶的荣誉、肩负的头衔,对应的是更严苛的标准、更厚重的担当、更务实的作为。唯有以实干匹配声名、以尽责诠释身份,方能不负荣誉、不负使命。 追名者,名常随风散;务实者,实至名自随。我们从不反对正当的名利,但反对脱离实绩的虚名、背离人民的私利。共产党人该追的名和利,应当是王戟那样,“名副其实”的名、“利在千秋”的利。 习主席深刻指出,“科学成就离不开精神支撑”“要鼓励科技工作者专注于自己的科研事业,勤奋钻研,不慕虚荣,不计名利”。广大党员干部当以王戟为镜,端正价值追求,把心思和精力真正用在干事创业上,努力交出一份无愧于党、无愧于人民、无愧于时代的合格答卷。