China Mil Watch Mandarin-source monitoring · Chinese military & security reporting
Independent monitor
Official PRC military media, read in the original
← Daily Brief
Modernization Political Work

Revelations from Wang Ji's Advanced Deeds | 1% Unreliability Is 100% Risk

王戟先进事迹启示录丨1%的不可靠,就是100%的风险
PLA Daily (解放军报) 10 August 2026
View original source ↗
Wang Ji, a defense software engineer working on high-assurance software for PLA weapons systems, is profiled in official military media for developing reliability verification tools and industry standards aimed at eliminating latent code vulnerabilities in major national and military program engineering projects. The article documents the PLA's institutional framing of software assurance as a zero-defect security requirement driven by the absence of foreign backstop technology — the explicit premise being that China cannot rely on external error correction in foundational software. The profile's invocation of Xi's 2020 artisan spirit (工匠精神) address and its emphasis on autonomous, controllable systems fits a recurring pattern in defense-industrial media of using individual exemplars to reinforce self-reliance norms, though Wang Ji's specific unit affiliation, institutional home, and the systems his tools cover are not disclosed.

The wise ancients paid close attention to "gaps" (隙), often lamenting that "a miss of a hair's breadth leads to an error of a thousand li" — those were visible gaps: a crack in a wall can bring down the entire wall; a breach in a dike can collapse a thousand li of embankment. Today, Wang Ji also pays close attention to "gaps," but these gaps are imperceptible to the naked eye.

In 1996, a news report deeply moved Wang Ji. Shortly after a foreign rocket lifted off, it deviated from its preset flight trajectory, then broke apart and triggered a violent explosion. The cause was a critical software defect in the guidance system that caused problems in the processing of velocity data. At that moment, he was seized by alarm and asked himself repeatedly: what if it were our code that had the error? From that point on, this question was etched deep into his mind, forged into that weighty admonition — "1% unreliability is 100% risk."

This is not a simple math problem; it is a profound dialectic of success and failure. Wang Ji frequently reviews those cases that shocked the world: during the Gulf War, a certain country's air defense missile failed to intercept an incoming missile due to a control software defect, causing heavy casualties; at the turn of the century, the "Y2K bug" triggered global panic… In his eyes, these "lessons from those who came before" are not news items to be glanced at and forgotten, but a "Sword of Damocles" hanging over his head at all times.

The battlefield is an extreme contest of life and death. Failing to achieve absolute certainty means that a single failure leads to total failure. Especially in the era of informatized and intelligentized warfare (信息化智能化战争), the fatal "ant holes" that constrain equipment performance and determine victory or defeat on the battlefield are not only the obvious hardware damage, but also the latent vulnerabilities concealed within underlying code, algorithmic logic, and system linkages. This category of risk is highly concealed, difficult to identify, and has a long incubation period. It may appear negligible, yet in reality harbors fatal hidden dangers capable of overturning the entire situation.

The era-defining imperative of achieving self-reliance and self-strengthening in core national defense technologies has determined that China's defense scientific research has no external space for error tolerance and backstop support. China's underlying foundational software and high-assurance core technologies have long faced external technological barriers; there is no buffer zone in which foreign technology can correct errors or external forces can fill gaps. It is precisely for this reason that Wang Ji, grounded in the hard security requirement of autonomous and controllable systems, proactively cultivated deep expertise in the field of high-assurance software technology — building a theoretical framework from scratch, leading the formulation of industry standards, and over decades of quiet, determined effort holding the line on core technology security. He transformed "preventing problems before they arise" into an operational methodology. He and his team work like surgeons, scrutinizing every line of code under a microscope, exhausting every category of extreme operating condition, and with an attitude of ultimate rigor in scientific research, severing risk transmission chains at the source, sealing systemic security vulnerabilities, and permitting no single software "cancer cell" to survive.

"Tenacious dedication, excellence in craft, meticulous care, pursuit of excellence (执着专注、精益求精、一丝不苟、追求卓越)" — in November 2020, at the commendation ceremony for national model workers and advanced workers, Chairman Xi expounded on the profound connotations of the artisan spirit (工匠精神) in these terms. Over many years, Wang Ji has upheld the scientific research credo of "1% unreliability is 100% risk," leading his team to develop a "toolbox" targeting software reliability problems of different types across different domains, making important contributions to the reliability and safety of critical software in major national and military program engineering projects. This is precisely a true embodiment of military scientific research workers in the new era carrying forward the artisan spirit.

Those who achieve great things build on solid foundations; those who aim far guard against superficiality and pretension. Wang Ji has devoted a lifetime of wholehearted dedication to the front lines of national defense scientific research, safeguarding the security of major-power equipment to a standard approaching the absolute, and setting a clear benchmark for the national defense scientific research community in the new era. We should take Wang Ji as our model, and with high-assurance scientific research achievements, underpin a high-level foundation for winning wars.

Original Chinese
智慧的古人重视“隙”,常叹“差之毫厘,谬以千里”,那是看得见的缝隙——墙上一道缝,可毁整面墙;堤上一处隙,可溃千里堤。如今,王戟也重视“隙”,但这“隙”肉眼难辨。 1996年,一则新闻深深触动了王戟。国外某型火箭升空不久,即偏离了预设的飞行轨道,随后解体并引发剧烈爆炸,原因在于制导系统中的一个关键软件缺陷,导致系统在处理速度数据时出现了问题。那一刻,他心生警觉,反复叩问自己:如果出错的是我们的代码呢?从此,这句叩问深深刻进他的脑海,淬炼出那句沉甸甸的告诫——“1%的不可靠,就是100%的风险。” 这并非简单的数学题,而是成与败的深刻辩证。王戟时常复盘那些震惊世界的案例:海湾战争中,某国防空导弹因控制软件缺陷未能拦截来袭导弹,造成大量人员伤亡;世纪之交,电脑“千年虫”问题引发全球性恐慌……这些“前车之鉴”,在他眼中不是一览而过的新闻,而是时刻悬在头顶的“达摩克利斯之剑”。 战场是生死对决的极限博弈,做不到万无一失,就会导致一失万无。特别是进入信息化智能化战争时代,制约装备性能、左右战场胜负的致命“蚁穴”,不只是直观的硬件损伤,还有隐匿在底层代码、算法逻辑、系统链路中的隐性漏洞。这类风险隐蔽性强、辨识度低、潜伏周期长,看似微乎其微,实则暗藏倾覆全局的致命隐患。 国防核心技术自立自强的时代命题,决定了我国国防科研没有容错兜底的外部空间。我国底层基础软件、高可信核心技术长期面临外部技术壁垒,不存在外来技术纠错、外力补位的缓冲地带。正因如此,王戟立足自主可控的安全刚需,主动深耕高可信软件技术领域,从零搭建理论体系、牵头制定行业标准,以数十年沉潜攻坚守住核心技术安全底线,把“防患于未然”变成了一套可运行的方法论。他和团队就像手术师,拿着显微镜审视每一行代码,穷尽各类极端工况,以极致较真的科研姿态,从源头切断风险传导链路、封堵体系安全漏洞,不容许任何一个软件“癌细胞”存活。 “执着专注、精益求精、一丝不苟、追求卓越”——2020年11月,在全国劳动模范和先进工作者表彰大会上,习主席这样阐释工匠精神的深刻内涵。多年来,王戟秉持“1%的不可靠,就是100%的风险”的科研信条,带领团队针对不同领域、不同类型的软件可靠性问题,打造出一套“工具箱”,为国家和军队重大型号工程关键软件的可靠性和安全性作出了重要贡献,这正是新时代军队科研工作者发扬工匠精神的真实写照。 大成者重根基,致远者戒虚浮。王戟以一生赤诚深耕国防科研一线,以近乎极致的标准守护大国装备安全,为新时代国防科研队伍立起鲜明标杆。我们当以王戟为榜样,以高可信的科研成果,支撑高水平的胜战之基。