Strong Military Forum | Settling Old Accounts Is Itself Building New Achievements
Settling Old Accounts Is Itself Building New Achievements
■ Sun Yang
In practice, some newly appointed leading cadres tend to treat historically inherited difficult problems as hot potatoes, feeling more or less apprehensive when confronted with them. Viewed through the lens of dialectics, those long-unresolved old accounts conceal squandered opportunities, overlooked resources, and eroded trust — they are exam questions left unanswered in the course of an undertaking's development. Looking further at actual results, the courage and skill to settle old accounts can not only clear the bottlenecks and blockages on the road ahead, but can also yield a clear picture of the baseline state of construction, remedy shortfalls in development, and accumulate momentum and energy for long-term growth.
Whether one correctly recognizes and treats old accounts is a touchstone for testing whether a Party member cadre's view of political achievement (政绩观) is sound. Chairman Xi once wrote in the essay "One Must Be Willing to Do the Work of Laying the Foundation" (《要甘于做铺垫之事》): "Refusing to act on anything one did not personally initiate, insisting on stamping one's own mark of political achievement before doing anything — this is not the style of a Communist Party leading cadre." The "old" in old accounts refers to time being in the past, but the accounts themselves have never belonged to any single term of office. For example: urgent and difficult concerns of grassroots officers and soldiers that remain unresolved; stubborn problems that have long constrained grassroots-level construction; entrenched malpractices and bad habits that have never been fundamentally corrected — these may on the surface appear to be old accounts left by predecessors, but behind them lie long-term accounts connected to the vital interests of officers and soldiers, to combat effectiveness building, and to the political ecology of the unit. Not one of them can be dodged, dragged out, or left in arrears. These problem areas and shortfalls are precisely the important breakthrough points for the incumbent to pursue development and open new ground. When leading cadres treat settling old accounts not as a burden but as an opportunity, they come to understand one truth: settling old accounts is itself building new achievements.
Clearing old accounts tests Party spirit (党性). Old accounts are complex in origin, broad in scope, and resolving them is often "thankless hard work." With strong Party spirit, old accounts, however difficult, are one's own responsibility; with weak Party spirit, old accounts, however minor, become someone else's business. When Jiao Yulu took up his post in Lankao, what lay before him was the heavy old account of the "three scourges" — waterlogging, sandstorms, and saline-alkali soil. He did not seek out a different track to manufacture short-term highlights; instead, he plunged headlong into the sand dunes and low-lying areas to investigate root causes and seek solutions, and in breaking through that historical predicament he found the path to sand control and agricultural revival, leaving behind a spiritual legacy that transcends time and space. The facts prove that with firm Party spirit, old accounts can be cleared, and "historical negative assets" can be transformed into "new space for development."
Clearing old accounts depends on method. In dealing with old accounts, one must neither turn a blind eye and push them aside, nor simply negate everything wholesale and start from scratch. For planned tasks that conform to the laws of construction and meet the demands of war preparedness but remain unfinished, hold firm to seeing one blueprint through to completion and continue advancing their implementation. For projects that are detached from reality, contain flaws, or are unsustainable, make corrections and adjustments in a realistic and pragmatic manner. For entrenched chronic ailments (积弊沉疴) that harm the interests of officers and soldiers and obstruct the generation of combat effectiveness, dare to take real, hard action and eliminate them completely. Settling old accounts is often more complex and thorny than charting new chapters, but solutions always outnumber difficulties — get a clear picture of the actual situation, apply differentiated measures by category, and press forward with courage, and old accounts can be properly settled.
Fundamentally, settling old accounts is for the purpose of better building new achievements. In recent years, the Party committees of several successive terms in many units have, with the spirit of "success need not be attributed to me" (功成不必在我), taken turns resolving inherited problems related to supporting facilities at training grounds, employment for family members who have relocated with the military, and barracks renovation. After one old account after another has been cleared, the bottlenecks that had constrained combat effectiveness building for years were consequently opened up, and the cohesion of the troops continued to rise. This shows that settling old accounts properly — clearing blockages, restoring confidence, optimizing governance, and consolidating strength — is not only remedial work for the past but also paving the road for the future. More valuable still, drawing lessons from the process of settling old accounts and establishing rules and systems, achieving a leap from "resolving one problem" to "breaking through a category of problems" and "elevating an entire domain," allows old accounts to become incremental gains for development.
Old accounts must not be "passed down from generation to generation." Leading cadres at all levels who establish and practice a correct view of political achievement (政绩观) should have the consciousness and sense of responsibility to settle old accounts as new officials (新官理旧账). Regardless of when old accounts were created or how they came about, as long as they affect unit construction and the interests of officers and soldiers, one must without hesitation "work through them" — turning "stumbling blocks" into "stepping stones," converting the stock of old accounts into new underlying assets, so that the foundation for development is more solid and its staying power more robust.