China Mil Watch Mandarin-source monitoring · Chinese military & security reporting
Independent monitor
Official PRC military media, read in the original
← Daily Brief
Doctrine Political Work

Cutting Unnecessary "Hassle": This Brigade Establishes Rules and Regulations to Give Officers and Soldiers Enough "Buffer Time"

减掉不必要的“折腾”,这个旅建章立制为官兵留够“缓冲时间”
PLA Daily (解放军报) 15 May 2026
View original source ↗
A brigade of the 71st Group Army launched a 'Three Reductions' (三减) campaign—reducing pressure, burdens, and unnecessary hassle—after an on-site investigation (蹲点调研) found that a 10-minute post-reveille buffer the brigade had deliberately created was being competed away by companies trying to demonstrate motivation, with similar layer-upon-layer escalation (层层加码) documented across interior management and paperwork practices. The article documents a recurring institutional problem: grassroots units converting discretionary space into competitive signaling, which the brigade addressed by rewriting 127 items into a formal 'burden-reduction list' (减负清单) and pairing it with political education on correct 政绩观 (views of political achievement). An appended commentary complicates the brigade's approach, raising the question of whether rule-making is the right instrument for problems that a single on-the-spot correction from a duty officer might have resolved more efficiently.

A Brigade of the 71st Group Army Establishes Rules and Regulations to Give Officers and Soldiers Enough "Buffer Time"——

"Fall in by 0610" Changed to "Move Out Punctually at 0610"

■ Yu Yunzhi, Liu Renhao; PLA Daily Correspondents Song Shijie; Illustrated by Xie Yan

In the early morning hours, the long reveille call rang out across the garrison. Director Dong of the Political Work Department, the duty officer of a certain brigade of the 71st Group Army, arrived at the training ground to wait for officers and soldiers to fall in. Before long, several formations arrived in step. Director Dong checked his watch—0605, five minutes ahead of the scheduled time.

In the past, units of the brigade would generally sound reveille at 0600, and officers and soldiers would fall in and begin morning physical training. A month earlier, when the headquarters organized an on-site investigation (蹲点调研), many grassroots officers and soldiers reported that the moment reveille sounded they had to fall in and form up—there was no time to wash up, and even time to use the toilet was extremely tight. Considering that regulations did not specify this clearly, the brigade decided to leave a 10-minute "buffer time" after reveille, requiring only that officers and soldiers be assembled by 0610.

The measure was immediately welcomed at the grassroots level. However, after more than half a month had passed, the assembly times of each company grew earlier and earlier, creeping back toward the original 0600.

"You were the ones saying there wasn't enough time, and you're the ones assembling early—what is going on here?" After training ended that day, Director Dong sought out officers and soldiers to find out what was happening. Instructor Zhang of the Engineer Company was candid: "At first, everyone really did assemble on time. But there was always a difference in who arrived at the training ground first. Some people felt that arriving early showed high motivation and strict discipline, so they started blowing the whistle early to assemble. And so it went—one unit moved up by two minutes, another by three, and the assembly time kept getting earlier."

"Even though the brigade made clear that assembling by 0610 was fine, if everyone else was already there early and we arrived on time, it looked like we were 'late.'" Sergeant Squad Leader Zhang Chunhui felt somewhat helpless. "Everyone is 'competing' (卷). Anyone who doesn't compete looks like they're 'lying flat' (躺平)."

This steadily shrinking 10 minutes sparked a discussion at the brigade's handover meeting: the "buffer time" left for officers and soldiers had been competed away by the grassroots themselves—where was the problem?

The brigade's leadership analyzed that the crux of the problem lay in some grassroots cadres and backbone personnel handling issues through habitual thinking, falling into the trap of equating "self-imposed escalation" (自我加码) with "strict standards."

The topic expanded beyond the "10 minutes." Everyone quickly discovered that similar problems were not limited to this one case: interior management standards were clear, yet individual squads and platoons raised requirements on their own initiative, blindly pursuing uniformity, making it inconvenient to retrieve combat readiness materiel; some comrades insisted on keeping records for non-essential work tasks, leaving a paper trail (留痕) "just in case"… Such instances of layer-upon-layer escalation (层层加码) occurred from time to time, consuming officers' and soldiers' energy and disrupting normal order.

"Work is not something 'done for leaders to see or reported for superiors to hear'—we must reduce empty formalism and hollow activity, and lighten the burden on the grassroots!" To this end, the brigade launched a "Three Reductions" (三减) campaign under the theme of "reducing pressure, reducing burdens, and reducing hassle" (减压、减负、减折腾). Through questionnaires and other methods, 127 items of opinions and suggestions were collected from the grassroots. A precise "burden-reduction list" (减负清单) was then drawn up, and corresponding measures were explicitly written into daily norms:

Changing the ambiguous "fall in by 0610" to the more precise "move out punctually at 0610," using institutional rules to preserve "flexible space" (弹性空间); emphasizing that interior management arrangements must facilitate combat readiness, so that officers and soldiers need not expend energy on unnecessary minor details; making clear that headquarters organs may not require grassroots units to retroactively fill in education notebooks or registration statistics for the purpose of passing inspections or examinations, and may not simply use "leaving a paper trail" (留痕) as the criterion for evaluating work…

Beyond the list, the brigade kept close watch on the "flexible space" in the implementation of regulations and rules, and in combination with grassroots realities, clarified policy boundaries and implementation standards. Headquarters organs were required to state requirements clearly when issuing notices, without vague language, to avoid misunderstanding at the grassroots level. At the same time, in conjunction with study and education on establishing and practicing a correct view of political achievement (政绩观), they guided headquarters and grassroots cadres to rectify their thinking and conduct, correctly understand the building concepts of higher authorities, and foster a clean and upright atmosphere for getting things done.

Today, after reveille sounds in the early morning, the sound of footsteps in the corridors remains brisk, but with somewhat less panic—officers and soldiers move out punctually at 0610. On the parade ground, the call-and-response chants are louder than before. Staff Sergeant Pei Lida of a certain company remarked with feeling: "Before, we were afraid of being slower than others. Now, assembling on time, we feel much more at ease."

"What has been reduced is the burden; what has been elevated is genuine combat effectiveness." The brigade's leadership introduced that the "burden-reduction list" has not only cut unnecessary "hassle," but has also cut the anxiety in officers' and soldiers' hearts. Without the weight of mental burdens, everyone is better able to concentrate on training for war and preparing for combat.

Short Commentary

First, credit is due to this brigade of the 71st Group Army—for the sake of officers' and soldiers' squeezed "10 minutes," they conducted dedicated investigation and research, established rules and regulations, changed the vague language of "fall in by 0610" to the precise requirement of "move out punctually at 0610," and returned the squeezed "10 minutes" to officers and soldiers.

Beyond giving credit, should we not also consider: to solve grassroots problems similar to "meaningless internal competition" (无意义的内卷) and "harmful enthusiasm" (有害的积极性), are there other, better, more straightforward approaches besides establishing rules and regulations? Specifically on the issue of "assembling early"—if the on-site commander's response had been not tacit approval or even praise, but criticism, or even just a reminder, would results not have been seen the very next day? Compared to investing energy in investigation and research and establishing rules and regulations, would that approach not have a higher "cost-effectiveness ratio"?

It must therefore be pointed out that many minor problems and non-fundamental problems perhaps do not require the establishment of rules and regulations to resolve—or rather, establishing rules and regulations is not necessarily the "optimal choice" for resolving such problems.

(Xu Wen)

Original Chinese
第71集团军某旅建章立制为官兵留够“缓冲时间”—— “6:10前集合完毕”改为“6:10准时带出” ■于云之 刘仁浩 解放军报特约记者 宋世杰 谢岩 绘 清晨时分,悠长的起床号响彻营区,第71集团军某旅值班首长、政治工作部董主任来到训练场等待官兵集合。没一会儿,几支队伍踏着整齐的步伐到来。董主任看了看表——6:05,比预定时间早了5分钟。 以往,该旅各单位一般在早上6点吹响起床号,官兵整队集合完毕便开始早操训练。一个月前,机关组织蹲点调研时,不少基层官兵反映,起床号一响就要集合站队,不要说洗漱,连上厕所的时间都十分紧张。考虑到条令条例中没有明确规定,该旅决定,在起床号之后留出10分钟的“缓冲时间”,官兵6:10前集合到位即可。 此举一出,立即受到基层欢迎。然而,半个多月过去后,各连的集合时间却越来越早,向着原本的6点靠近。 “说时间不够的是你们,提前集合的也是你们,这是唱的哪一出?”这天训练结束后,董主任找官兵了解情况。工兵连张指导员坦言:“起初,大家确实都是按时集合,可到达训练场总有先后。有人觉得早点到位显得积极性高、作风严,就提前吹哨集合。就这样你提前2分钟、我提前3分钟,集合时间越来越早。” “虽然旅里明确6:10集合即可,但如果大家都早早到位,我们按时到位,看起来也像‘迟到’。”中士班长张春晖感到有些无奈,“大家都‘卷’,谁不‘卷’,就显得像是‘躺平’。” 这不断缩减的10分钟,在旅交班会上引发了一场讨论——留给官兵的“缓冲时间”,被基层自己“比”没了,问题出在哪里? 该旅领导分析认为,问题症结在于部分基层干部骨干按惯性思维考虑和处理问题,陷入将“自我加码”等同于“严格要求”的误区。 话题从“10分钟”延展开来。大家很快发现,相似的问题不止这一个:内务标准明晰,个别班排却自行拔高要求,盲目追求整齐划一,导致战备物资不便拿取;非必要的工作台账,有些同志却坚持留痕,以备“不时之需”……诸如此类,层层加码现象时有发生,牵扯官兵精力,影响正常秩序。 “工作不是‘做给领导看、说给上级听’的,必须减少虚耗空转,减轻基层负担!”为此,该旅以“减压、减负、减折腾”为主题展开“三减”活动,通过问卷调查等多种形式,收集基层意见建议127条,然后精准制订出“减负清单”,并将对应措施明确写入日常规范—— 将“6:10前集合完毕”改为更加明确的“6:10准时带出”,用制度留够“弹性空间”;强调内务设置必须利于战备,让官兵不用把精力花费在不必要的细枝末节上;明确机关不得为了迎检迎考要求基层补教育笔记、补登记统计,不得简单用“留痕”评判工作…… 清单之外,该旅紧盯条令条例执行中的“弹性空间”,结合基层实际,明确政策边界和执行标准,并要求机关下发通知时说清要求,不可含糊其辞,避免基层产生误解。与此同时,他们还结合树立和践行正确政绩观学习教育,引导机关和基层干部端正思想和作风,正确理解上级的抓建思路,营造风清气正的干事创业氛围。 如今,清晨起床号响后,楼道里的脚步声依旧急促,但少了几分慌张,官兵们6:10准时带出。操场上,呼号声比以往更加洪亮。某连二级上士裴利达感慨:“以前生怕比别人慢,现在按时集合,心里踏实多了。” “减掉的是负担,提升的是实实在在的战斗力。”该旅领导介绍,“减负清单”不仅减掉不必要的“折腾”,更减掉了官兵心里的焦虑。没了思想包袱,大家更能集中精力练兵备战。 小兵快评 首先要为第71集团军某旅点赞——为了官兵被挤压的“10分钟”,他们专门调查研究,建章立制,把“6:10前集合完毕”的模糊用语改为“6:10准时带出”的精确要求,将被挤压的“10分钟”还给了官兵。 点赞之余,我们是否也应思考,想解决基层类似“无意义的内卷”“有害的积极性”,除了建章立制之外,还有没有其他更好的、更为简便的办法?具体到“提前集合”这个问题上,现场的指挥员如果给出的态度不是默许、甚至表扬,而是批评,哪怕只是提醒,会不会在第二天便见到成效?相比投入精力去调查研究、建章立制,这样做是否“性价比”更高? 所以,需要指出的是,很多小问题、非根本性问题,也许不需要建章立制来解决,或者说建章立制并非解决这些问题的“最优选”。 (徐雯)