China Mil Watch Mandarin-source monitoring · Chinese military & security reporting
Independent monitor
Official PRC military media, read in the original
← Daily Brief
Nuclear Political Work

A Rocket Force Brigade: Change Begins with the 'Three Half-Hours'

火箭军某旅:改变,从“三个半小时”开始
PLA Daily (解放军报) 25 July 2026
View original source ↗
An unnamed Rocket Force brigade conducted a 三查三看 ('Three Investigations, Three Examinations') audit of its internal regulations, categorizing all standing rules as 'rescind,' 'revise,' or 'retain' after grassroots units flagged conflicts between older brigade-level notices and newer Rocket Force and CMC-level directives — the specific trigger being contradictory guidance on how to run the 三个半小时 ('Three Half-Hours') daily political education routine. The article documents a recurring friction in PLA institutional governance: higher-level regulatory updates accumulate faster than subordinate units can reconcile or retire their own legacy rules, leaving company-grade officers caught between competing written requirements. The brigade's political-legal commission framing this as a 依法治军 ('governing the military according to law') compliance exercise, rather than a political rectification, fits the post-2020 pattern of Rocket Force units using legal-system language to enforce regulatory discipline at the grassroots level.

A Rocket Force Brigade Conducts 'Three Investigations, Three Examinations' to Clean Up Regulations and Institutions—— Change Begins with the 'Three Half-Hours' ■ Hu Jinxiang, PLA Daily Special Correspondent Han Zhilin, Special Reporter Zhang Xinkai

On a scorching summer day, inside a tent dining facility at a Rocket Force brigade's field training site, officers and soldiers of one company ate lunch while watching a news program rolling on television.

"We adjusted the time for watching the news to midday because training is scheduled for this evening," Company Political Instructor Wang told the reporter. Since the field training began, training intensity has increased and various tasks must be adjusted at any time to suit the actual conditions of the training site. They have made full use of fragmented time to organize the "Three Half-Hours" (三个半小时) activities, both fulfilling the regulatory requirements and broadening the officers' and soldiers' horizons—an arrangement welcomed by the troops.

"After the regulations and institutions cleanup was carried out, some previously overlapping and ambiguous requirements became clear and explicit. We now know what we are doing when we implement them, and execution has become smoother and more efficient," Political Instructor Wang remarked.

For a long time, the "Three Half-Hours" has been an important institution for conducting routine ideological work (经常性思想工作) in the troops. Several years ago, the brigade's headquarters issued a notice requiring grassroots units to strictly implement it on a daily basis: half an hour of radio listening in the morning, half an hour of newspaper reading at midday, and half an hour of television watching in the evening. In practice, however, some individual grassroots units simply understood "implementation" as "filling the time and having everyone present," and the forms of organization were relatively uniform.

Last year, in accordance with relevant higher-level requirements, the Rocket Force issued a notice specifying that grassroots units' radio listening and newspaper reading could be flexibly and independently arranged in conjunction with morning exercises, mealtimes, self-study, and other occasions.

During implementation, however, Political Instructor Wang found himself in a difficult position: the brigade had neither rescinded the earlier regulations nor provided further clarification on how to implement the new requirements. What exactly should be done?

In order to "avoid making mistakes," they could only continue following the previous requirements. Over time, individual officers and soldiers grew listless while listening to or watching the news, and the subsequent discussions and exchanges were empty and insubstantial, leaving the "Three Half-Hours" activities with less than satisfactory results.

Some time ago, grassroots officers and soldiers raised the issue of contradictions and conflicts between such new higher-level regulations and the unit's own older requirements. Brigade leadership studied the matter and concluded that in recent years, regulations and institutions covering areas such as combat readiness training and ideological and political education had been issued at various levels, with much of the content adjusted to reflect the characteristics of the new-era situation and tasks. Yet some of the unit's own older requirements had not been rescinded, resulting in overlapping content that left grassroots units at a loss during execution and undermined the quality and effectiveness of grassroots development.

The brigade immediately convened the relevant functional sections to sort through and analyze the contradictions and problems, and to pool their wisdom to break through the bottlenecks and sticking points. They adopted a comprehensive, case-by-case inspection approach to systematically review all regulations and institutions. Using the method of "Three Investigations, Three Examinations" (三查三看)—investigating timeliness to see whether provisions are outdated, investigating basis to see whether they are compliant, and investigating implementation to see whether they are effective—they categorized all regulations and institutions into three situations: "to be rescinded," "recommended for revision," and "to remain in effect," and established a classified ledger accordingly.

The reporter reviewed the cleanup ledger and found that for each item requiring action, the specific situation, basis for execution, and proposed disposition were recorded item by item. For example, regarding the organization of "Three Half-Hours" activities, the relevant department specified "innovate the methods, organize flexibly."

Cleaning up regulations and institutions is not simply a matter of rescinding and revising; more importantly, it lies in guiding officers and soldiers to carry out their work using rule-of-law thinking (法治思维) and rule-of-law methods (法治方式).

"Comrade, hello. Please present your relevant credentials and vehicle dispatch procedures..." At a guard post within the garrison area, sentry Xiao Wang was inspecting multiple vehicles entering and exiting the garrison in accordance with regulations. Recently, officers and soldiers cross-referenced the relevant content in the newly revised Internal Affairs Regulations (内务条令) and the Provisions on Several Matters of Troop Management issued by higher authorities, compiled the latest duty standards and requirements into a reference volume, and strictly implemented them accordingly. Everyone now feels more confident when standing duty.

Sergeant First Class Wang, a squad leader serving as duty section leader for a certain company, told the reporter that previously, officers and soldiers on duty still referred to notices issued by the brigade headquarters. After the regulations and institutions cleanup was launched, the headquarters carefully studied and compared the latest higher-level regulatory requirements and found that some provisions were outdated and vague, and did not interface smoothly with higher-level regulations. Adhering to the principle of rule of law first and benchmarking against standards (对标对表), they promptly rescinded a number of outdated notices. In recent weeks, key elements such as the configuration of the brigade's guard and duty posts, standardization of sentry movements, and emergency response procedures have been re-sorted and codified.

"To strengthen officers' and soldiers' rule-of-law thinking and promote the comprehensive implementation of governing the military according to law (依法治军), we must write the 'follow-on chapter' of regulations and institutions cleanup," a leader from the brigade's political-legal commission (政法委) explained. At present, they are sorting through opinions and suggestions reported by grassroots units. For unreasonable content arising from insufficient understanding of regulations or misinterpretation, they will provide targeted explanations and guidance to lead officers and soldiers to truly study and thoroughly understand the regulations and institutions, promote performance of duties according to law at all levels, and ensure that regulations and institutions take root at the grassroots level and produce visible results.

Original Chinese
火箭军某旅开展“三查三看”清理法规制度—— 改变,从“三个半小时”开始 ■胡金香 解放军报特约通讯员 韩知霖 特约记者 张新凯 炎炎夏日,火箭军某旅野外驻训场的一间帐篷餐厅内,某连官兵一边吃着午饭,一边收看电视上滚动播放的新闻节目。 “今天傍晚安排了训练,所以我们把收看新闻的时间调整到了中午。”该连王指导员告诉记者,驻训以来,由于训练强度增大,各项任务也需要根据驻训场实际随时调整,他们充分利用碎片化时间安排“三个半小时”活动,既落实了法规要求,又开阔了官兵视野,受到官兵欢迎。 “法规制度清理工作开展后,过去一些交叉模糊的规定要求变得清晰明了,我们落实起来心中有数,执行起来也更加顺畅高效。”王指导员这样感慨。 长期以来,“三个半小时”是部队开展经常性思想工作的一项重要制度。几年前,该旅机关下发通知,要求基层单位每日严格落实,做到早晨听半小时广播、中午读半小时报纸、晚上看半小时电视。实践中,个别基层单位却把“落实”简单理解为“时间占满、人员到齐”,组织形式也较为单一。 去年,依据上级相关要求,火箭军下发通知明确,基层听广播、读报纸,可以结合早操、就餐、自学等时机灵活自主安排。 然而落实过程中,王指导员却有些犯难:旅队并未废止前期规定,也未对如何落实新要求作出进一步明确,到底应该怎么办? 为了“不出错”,他们只能继续按照过去要求进行。时间久了,个别官兵在收听收看新闻时无精打采,之后的讨论交流也言之无物,“三个半小时”活动效果不甚理想。 前段时间,基层官兵反映了此类上级新规定与本级旧要求存在矛盾冲突的问题。旅领导研究感到,近年来,各级出台了一系列涵盖战备训练、思想政治教育等方面的法规制度,不少内容结合新时代形势任务特点作出了变化调整,可本级的一些旧要求尚未废止,存在内容交织问题,导致基层在执行过程中无所适从,影响了基层建设质效。 该旅立即集中相关业务科室梳理研析矛盾问题,集智破解堵点卡点。他们采取全域覆盖、逐个排查的方式,全方位梳理盘查各项法规制度,通过查时效看是否过时、查依据看是否合规、查落地看是否管用的“三查三看”办法,对各类法规制度按照“予以废止”“建议修改”“继续有效”三种情形分类建账。 记者翻看清理台账发现,他们对需要清理的内容逐条写明了具体情形、执行依据和处置意见。比如,针对组织开展“三个半小时”活动,相关部门明确“创新方式、灵活组织”。 法规制度清理并非简单的废止和修改,更在于引导官兵运用法治思维和法治方式开展工作。 “同志你好,请出示相关证件和派车手续……”营区某执勤点位上,哨兵小王正按照规定对多辆进出营区的车辆进行检查。近期,官兵们对照新修订的内务条令及上级颁发的部队管理若干规定中相关内容,将最新的执勤标准要求梳理成册并严格参照落实,大家在执勤时心中更有底数。 担任领班员的某连二级上士王班长告诉记者,前期,官兵上岗执勤依旧参照旅机关下发的通知开展。法规制度清理工作展开后,机关研读对照上级最新规定要求,发现有些规定内容存在滞后模糊、与上级法规衔接不畅等问题。他们坚持法治先行、对标对表,及时废止了一些过时的通知。近段时间,该旅警卫执勤点位设置、哨兵动作规范、应急处置流程等关键环节得到重新梳理和固化。 “强化官兵法治思维,推动依法治军全面落地,必须做好法规制度清理的‘下篇文章’。”该旅政法委一名领导介绍,目前,他们正在梳理基层上报的意见建议,对于因法规制度掌握不清、理解偏差导致的不合理内容,他们将针对性做好阐释解读,引导官兵真正将法规制度学懂学透,促进各级依法履职,确保法规制度在基层落地生根、见行见效。