← Daily Brief
Political Work

Seeking Truth from Facts, Working with Real Effort: An Army Brigade Rectifies Formalism (形式主义) in Its Work

求真务实、真抓实干,陆军某旅纠治工作中的形式主义
PLA Daily (解放军报) 14 May 2026
View original source ↗
A PLA Army brigade, identified only by type, has implemented procedural changes to after-action reviews as part of ongoing political consolidation training (政治整训), requiring headquarters staff to attend as silent observers rather than inspectors and encouraging grassroots soldiers to report problems without self-censorship. The article is a PLA Daily-published example of the broader campaign against formalism (形式主义) in military work, signaling institutional pressure to make internal feedback mechanisms function as genuine combat-readiness diagnostics rather than performance rituals. The piece is useful as evidence that the PLA continues to identify the gap between reported and actual unit readiness as a structural problem, though the article itself is a normative prescription rather than a report of measurable change.

An Army Brigade Rectifies Formalism (形式主义) in Its Work—— Headquarters Staff Sit In on After-Action Reviews; Grassroots Troops Hold Nothing Back

■ PLA Daily Special Correspondent Zang Qianwen

"Road" repair succeeded; the hastily constructed military road opened to traffic smoothly… Not long ago, a certain Army brigade concluded a realistic combat training exercise. Officers and soldiers organized an after-action review on the spot, with headquarters staff who had come to inspect the work sitting in as observers.

"Every instance of 'jamming up' during special-situation handling is a warning signal about our actual combat capability…" Staff Sergeant (Second Class) Chen Wei of a certain company was unaffected by the presence of the headquarters observers and spoke frankly about his own shortcomings in battlefield adaptability. Officers and soldiers vied to speak, laying out problems without concealment and drilling straight to the root causes. For a moment, the scene was thick with the "smell of gunpowder."

In the past, when faced with headquarters personnel, grassroots officers and soldiers always adopted an inspection-reception mindset, deliberately showcasing highlights and achievements; situations like this one—unvarnished, self-exposing of wounds—were rarely seen. Thinking of this, the reporter could not help but glance curiously at the headquarters cadres, who were listening attentively and occasionally jotting something down in their notebooks.

After the review ended, the reporter found an opportunity to ask the company's cadres and backbone personnel what was on their minds: "Your training also had quite a few highlights—why didn't you take the chance to show them off in front of the headquarters cadres?"

"Achievements won't run away if left unspoken; problems will get out of hand if left unaddressed." Company Political Instructor Zhou told the reporter that before taking up a grassroots command position, he had been a headquarters staff officer. After one exercise concluded, he went to a paired-assistance company to attend an after-action review. Perhaps wanting to make a good impression on the headquarters, that company spent more time on achievements and highlights and less on shortcomings and deficiencies. Afterward, some veteran soldiers reflected that the after-action review had become a formality—conducted hastily and sloppily—and that problems exposed during the exercise had not been promptly sorted through and reflected upon, nor had lessons and results been effectively distilled and summarized.

Since the sustained deepening of political consolidation training (政治整训), the brigade party committee has resolutely rectified formalism in its work, advocating that headquarters cadres conduct less pointing-and-inspecting and more on-the-ground investigation, "sitting on the same bench" as grassroots officers and soldiers; drawing on opportunities such as paired-assistance work to broadly collect the needs and opinions of officers and soldiers, establishing ledgers and applying targeted measures.

On this point, Staff Sergeant (Second Class) Zuo Jin of a certain company shared an experience with the reporter. Earlier, several operators had come to him to report a problem with a certain type of equipment starting slowly; after checking, he could not find the cause.

One day, Zuo Jin ran into Assistant Officer Lu from the brigade headquarters, who was stationed at the company for assistance work. In the course of their exchange, Zuo Jin raised his puzzlement. Assistant Officer Lu, drawing on his own experience carrying out missions in high-altitude areas, offered a hypothesis and immediately contacted the brigade's equipment maintenance and technical office, borrowing the relevant device to verify it.

The root cause of the malfunction was found. Alongside his relief, Zuo Jin began to worry: would this make Assistant Officer Lu think the company's equipment maintenance was inadequate, and lead to criticism? "As it turned out, I was overthinking it at the time. Not only did Assistant Officer Lu not do that—he also disseminated the relevant repair experience across the entire brigade." Zuo Jin said, somewhat sheepishly.

"Don't be a 'nominal passerby'; don't engage in nitpicking. Focus all thought and energy on solving real problems and truly resolving them." The brigade's leadership told the reporter that today, the brigade party committee's resolve to follow through to the end and demand real results has grown stronger; headquarters staff going deep into the grassroots and taking root at the front lines for research has increased; and officers and soldiers' awareness of striving for excellence and pursuing the highest standards has intensified.

As night fell, in the brigade headquarters building, many cadres were studying improvements to training plans based on the opinions and suggestions raised by officers and soldiers at the after-action review; in a certain company's meeting room, officers and soldiers were engaged in lively discussion of the day's training mistakes and progress… Since the sustained deepening of political consolidation training, the atmosphere of seeking truth from facts (求真务实) and working with real effort (真抓实干) has grown ever stronger throughout the brigade. Everyone is thinking in the same direction and pulling in the same direction, steadily driving the brigade's combat effectiveness upward.

Original Chinese
陆军某旅纠治工作中的形式主义—— 机关旁听复盘 基层毫不遮掩 ■解放军报特约记者 臧乾雯 “道路”抢修成功,急造军路顺利通车……前不久,陆军某旅一场实战化训练落下帷幕。官兵就地组织复盘会,前来检查工作的机关人员列席旁听。 “特情处置中的每一次‘卡壳’,都是对实战能力的一次预警……”某连二级上士陈玮未受机关旁听人员影响,直言自己在战场应变方面存在的不足。官兵争相发言,讲问题毫不遮掩,挖根源直击要害。一时间,现场“硝烟味”十足。 以往面对机关,基层官兵总是抱着迎检心态,有意展示亮点和成绩,像这样没有“包装”、自揭伤疤的情况并不多见。想到这里,记者不禁好奇地看向机关干部,只见他们认真倾听,不时在笔记本上记录着什么。 复盘结束,记者找到机会,向该连干部骨干问出内心想法:“你们训练中也有不少亮点,怎么不在机关干部面前好好展现一番?” “成绩不说跑不了,问题不讲不得了。”该连周指导员告诉记者,担任基层主官前,他曾是一名机关干事。一次演习结束,他到挂钩帮建的连队参加复盘会。或许是想给机关留下好印象,该连讲成绩亮点多、讲短板不足少。事后,部分老兵反映,复盘会流于形式,开得仓促潦草,演习中暴露出的问题没有及时得到梳理反思,经验成果也未能有效提炼总结。 持续深化政治整训以来,该旅党委坚决纠治工作中的形式主义,倡导机关干部少指点检查、多蹲点调查,与基层官兵“坐在同一条板凳上”;结合挂钩帮建等时机,广泛收集官兵需求和意见,建立台账、精准施策。 说到这里,某连二级上士左金向记者分享了一段经历。前期,几名操作手找他反映某型装备启动慢的问题,他排查一番也没找到原因。 一天,左金遇到蹲连帮建的旅机关卢助理员。交流中,左金说出自己的困惑。卢助理员结合自己赴高海拔地区执行任务的经历提出猜想,并当即联系旅装备维修技术室,借来相关装置进行验证。 故障症结找到了,左金在高兴之余,心里打起了鼓:这会不会让卢助理员觉得连队装备保养不到位,因此批评呢?“事实证明,是我当时想多了,卢助理员不仅没这样做,还把相关维修经验推广到全旅。”左金有些难为情地说。 “不做‘挂名过客’,不搞吹毛求疵,把全部心思和精力聚焦到解决真问题、真解决问题上。”该旅领导告诉记者,如今,旅党委一抓到底、务求实效的决心足了,机关深入基层、扎根一线的调研多了,官兵精益求精、追求卓越的意识强了。 夜幕降临,该旅机关楼里,不少干部根据官兵在复盘会上提出的意见建议,研究改进训练方案;某连会议室内,官兵热烈讨论白天训练中的失误和进步……持续深化政治整训以来,全旅上下求真务实、真抓实干的氛围愈发浓厚,大家心往一处想、劲往一处使,推动部队战斗力稳步提升。