← Daily Brief
Internal Security Political Work

Documents Circulated with Visible Revision Marks Reflect This Unit's Increasingly Pragmatic Work Style

带着修改痕迹的文件流转,体现着这个单位更加务实的工作作风
PLA Daily (解放军报) 7 July 2026
View original source ↗
The PAP Huangnan Detachment, Qinghai Corps, formalized a set of office economy measures last quarter after deputy political commissar-level leadership intervened to stop a staff officer from reprinting documents solely to remove visible revision marks, then directed the detachment party committee to codify the practice into standing procedure covering revision-mark routing, mandatory double-sided printing, supply repair-before-replace rules, and electronic record prioritization. The article documents a recurring institutional friction in PLA and PAP headquarters work: procedural norms around document presentation have historically prioritized the appearance of rigor over operational efficiency, and junior staff internalize those norms as career-risk management rather than as substantive standards. Publishing this incident in military media fits the ongoing 'diligent and thrifty army-building' campaign line, using a granular administrative anecdote to push behavioral change at the detachment level — its value is as a record of how that campaign is being operationalized in basic-level unit administration, not as evidence of a policy shift.

Last quarter, Li Jinhua, a staff officer at the headquarters of the People's Armed Police Huangnan Detachment, Qinghai Corps, encountered something unusual while submitting a proposal to detachment leadership.

Under the previous procedure, documents drafted by the headquarters had to be reviewed and signed level by level—by section chiefs, department heads, and detachment leaders in sequence. Whenever revisions were made, the relevant pages had to be reprinted to ensure that documents presented to higher-level leaders were "clean and free of any revision marks." This time, the director of the Political Work Office made only a few character changes directly on the two A4 pages bearing the proposal. Li Jinhua was about to reprint the pages as usual before submitting them to the deputy political commissar for review and signature. By coincidence, just as Li Jinhua reached the door of the document printing room, he ran into the deputy political commissar.

The deputy political commissar took the document, looked it over, and pointed to the revised passages: "The director's changes are perfectly legible and do not affect reading or comprehension. There is no need to reprint—I can sign directly." He signed his comments on the document on the spot and added: "A single document passes through the signatures of multiple leaders. If one or two sheets of paper are wasted at each review-and-signature stage, the accumulated cost of all that paper is no small sum."

Even so, Li Jinhua remained somewhat uneasy: in all his years working at the headquarters, he had never seen a document marked up with revision "blotches" submitted directly to the detachment's two principal officers. Would the leaders think he was being insufficiently rigorous or serious in his work?

Noticing Li Jinhua's concern, the deputy political commissar took the document and, as they walked, said: "Leaving these handwritten marks allows the detachment's principal officers to see at a glance the revision process and the full background of the document—it actually contains more information than a document that is clean throughout." With that, he brought Li Jinhua along as he visited in turn the offices of the detachment commander and the political commissar.

Pointing to the revision marks on the document, the detachment commander said: "The changes are perfectly clear to me—there is no need to reprint. Diligent and thrifty army-building (勤俭建军) is not a slogan to be shouted; it must be put into practice in the details of daily work and life, in concrete actions. Moreover, these revision marks are precisely the authentic imprint of each level exercising oversight and fulfilling its responsibilities." The political commissar also endorsed the approach and directed that, going forward, official documents circulated within the headquarters for review and signature could be transmitted with revision marks intact, provided the revisions did not affect readability or archiving. This would both conserve paper and improve the efficiency of the review-and-signature process, while reflecting the party committee headquarters' work style of seeking truth and being pragmatic (求真务实).

The detachment party committee subsequently used this incident as an opportunity to study and refine a number of specific measures for economical and thrifty daily office work at the headquarters, benchmarked against the "Outline for Basic-Level Building in the Military" (《军队基层建设纲要》) and higher-level directives on strictly practicing economy and opposing waste. These measures are as follows: First, normalize "revision-mark review and signature" (痕迹审签). Except for archival originals and classified documents handled in accordance with regulations, documents circulated and submitted for signature within the headquarters need not be reprinted if the leaders' revisions are clearly legible; they are to be transmitted directly through the existing process. Second, achieve full coverage of double-sided printing. All non-classified, non-formal documents at the headquarters are to be printed double-sided as a uniform standard; single-sided non-classified waste paper is to be collected centrally for use as internal draft paper and notepaper. Third, office supplies are to follow the principle of "repair before replace, trade old for new." Gel pens are to be issued with replacement refills, with pen casings reused; durable office supplies such as staplers, file folders, and staple removers are to be repaired first when they malfunction, and new items may only be requisitioned in exchange for the old item once it has been confirmed beyond repair. Fourth, non-classified work records are to prioritize electronic documents in order to reduce paper printing.

After this series of measures was introduced, the work concepts and habits of the detachment's officers and soldiers gradually began to change. Documents with revision marks circulate efficiently, the work style of the party committee headquarters has become more pragmatic, and the ethos of diligent and thrifty army-building and hard struggle (勤俭建军、艰苦奋斗) is steadily being integrated into the officers' and soldiers' daily training and life.

Original Chinese
上个季度,武警青海总队黄南支队机关干事李金华在向支队领导呈送一份方案时,发生了一件新鲜事。 按照以往流程,机关拟制的文件需要经过股室负责人、部门领导和支队领导逐级审签。凡有修改,相关纸页都要重新打印,确保呈送至上一级领导的文稿“干干净净,无改动痕迹”。这一次,政治工作处主任只在印有方案的两页A4纸上,改动了几个字。李金华正准备照例重新打印,呈给支队副政委审签。巧合的是,李金华刚走到文印室门口,正好碰到副政委。 副政委接过文件翻看后,指着修改的地方问道:“主任改得很清楚,不影响阅读和理解,不用重新打印,我可以直接签字。”说罢,他当即在文件上签下自己的意见,并补充说,“一份文件要经过多位领导签字,如果每个审签环节都浪费一两张纸,这些纸张累积下来的花费,可不是一笔小数目。” 话虽如此,李金华心里仍然有些忐忑:在机关工作这些年,他还未见过带着修改“花脸”的文件直接呈送支队两位主官。这样的文件呈上去,领导会不会觉得自己工作不严谨、不严肃? 看出了李金华的顾虑,副政委接过文件,边走边说:“留下这些笔迹,支队主官一眼就能看清文件的修改过程和来龙去脉,反倒比通篇干净的文件包含更多信息。”说着,便带着他先后去了支队长和政委的办公室。 指着文件上的修改痕迹,支队长说:“改动之处,我看得清清楚楚,没必要重新打印。勤俭建军不是喊口号,而是要落实到日常工作生活细节里、具体行动上。并且这种修改痕迹,也正是各级层层把关、履职尽责的真实印记。”政委也认可这种做法,要求以后机关的公文呈签,只要修改处不影响阅读和存档,都可以带着痕迹流转,如此既节约纸张,又提高审签效率,还能体现党委机关求真务实的工作作风。 随后,支队党委以此事为契机,对照《军队基层建设纲要》和上级关于厉行节约反对浪费的相关要求,研究细化机关日常办公勤俭节约若干具体举措:一是推行“痕迹审签”常态化。除存档正本、涉密文件按规定处理外,机关内部流转呈签的文件,若领导修改内容清晰可辨,不再重新打印,直接按现有流程流转。二是纸张双面打印全覆盖。机关所有非涉密、非正式文稿,统一实行双面打印;单面使用完的非涉密废纸集中回收,作为内部草稿、便笺用纸。三是办公用品“能修不换、以旧换新”。中性笔配发替芯,笔壳重复使用;订书机、文件夹、起钉器等耐用办公用品出现故障先维修,确认无法修复的凭旧物申领新品。四是非涉密工作记录优先使用电子文档,减少纸张打印量。 一系列举措出台后,该支队官兵的一些工作理念和习惯逐渐发生改变,带着修改痕迹的文件高效流转,党委机关的工作作风更加务实,勤俭建军、艰苦奋斗的作风正一步步融入官兵日常训练生活。