← Daily Brief
Modernization Doctrine Military Diplomacy

UK and France Jointly Advance Air-Launched Cruise Missile Upgrade

英法联合推进空射巡航导弹升级
PLA Daily (解放军报) 24 June 2026
View original source ↗
A PLA military media analysis by Chai Shuiping and Zhang Zhimin examines the Storm Shadow/SCALP-EG cruise missile program, covering its Gulf War origins, design features, combat performance in Ukraine and India-Pakistan, and the UK-France Mk2 upgrade and FC/ASW successor program announced in early 2025. The article documents PLA analytical interest in Western cruise missile vulnerabilities—specifically GPS jamming susceptibility, low-speed interception risk, and stockpile attrition under sustained combat use—drawing directly on Russian electronic warfare successes against Storm Shadow in Ukraine as evidence of exploitable weaknesses. It fits a recurring pattern in PLA defense media of using open-source Western capability assessments to benchmark Chinese air defense and electronic warfare requirements against peer-competitor munitions, with the India-Pakistan use case in May 2025 adding a new data point on Storm Shadow performance in a near-peer contested environment.

By virtue of their distinctive flight profiles and penetration capabilities, cruise missiles are frequently employed on the battlefield as a "door-kicking" instrument, repeatedly playing an important role in modern warfare. Yet as the forms and patterns of warfare continue to evolve, cruise missiles have been on a continuous path of evolution in order to better achieve penetration and reduce the probability of interception.

Storm Shadow, jointly developed by the United Kingdom and France in the mid-1990s, is precisely such a long-range stealth precision-strike cruise missile. Since the UK and France announced last year the resumption of Storm Shadow air-launched cruise missile production, the two sides announced again in February of this year their intention to upgrade the missile to the Mk2 standard.

So what kind of missile is Storm Shadow, that it has prompted the UK and France to restart and expand production lines? And what new directions and trends in the future development of cruise missiles does its "upgrade path" reflect? See this issue's analysis.

UK and France Jointly Advance Air-Launched Cruise Missile Upgrade——

Where Is Storm Shadow Headed?

■ Chai Shuiping, Zhang Zhimin

[Caption: Storm Shadow air-launched cruise missile. Photo provided by Yangming]

The Gulf War's Wound: An Urgent Need for a "Stand-Off" Strike Instrument

During the Gulf War, the United States employed Tomahawk cruise missiles to efficiently achieve stand-off precision strikes with zero casualties, while European Tornado fighter aircraft suffered heavy losses because they were required to penetrate deep into Iraqi air defense fire zones to deliver ordnance. The UK alone lost 7 aircraft with multiple pilots killed or captured—the highest aircraft loss among coalition forces—exposing a critical shortfall in long-range high-precision strike capability. The Gulf War made clear to the UK that without stand-off missiles there is no carrier aircraft safety, and that it was imperative to accelerate the development of its own air-based missiles.

Joint development to break free from dependence on the United States. Looking back historically, as early as after the 1982 Falklands War, the UK and other countries recognized that long-range strike weapons were indispensable. That same year, multiple NATO nations launched the Modular Stand-Off Weapon (MSOW) program; however, that program ended when the United States withdrew. To accelerate the acquisition of stand-off strike weapons, the UK launched the Conventionally Armed Stand-Off Missile (CASOM) program in 1994. After multiple rounds of competitive bidding and technical validation, the UK ultimately chose to jointly develop the weapon with France, opting to base it directly on France's near-complete Apache C anti-runway cruise missile for deep modification and development.

Rapid progress: fielded in five years. The UK's choice to partner with France was also driven by multiple considerations including technology, cost, and schedule. The two countries signed an agreement in July 1996, awarded a development contract to MBDA in 1997, conducted the first test launch from a French Mirage 2000N fighter in December 2000, and fielded the missile with the Royal Air Force first in 2002—only five years elapsed from signing the development contract to fielding. The cycle was short, efficiency was high, and it filled this capability gap in a timely manner.

One missile, two names: software systems differ. Based on their respective requirements, the UK version is called Storm Shadow and the French version is called SCALP-EG. The two share identical hardware and the same key technologies, but the software, interfaces, and subsystems employed differ somewhat. The UK's Storm Shadow is adapted to NATO communications systems, data links, and standards, and is primarily equipped on Tornado GR4 and Typhoon fighters. France employs indigenously developed avionics and mission software, primarily for equipping Mirage 2000D and Rafale fighters, and places greater emphasis on autonomous operational capability.

Concentrating Strengths in Development: Distinctive Design Features

Storm Shadow can be said to be a subsonic stealth stand-off air-launched cruise missile developed by the UK and France by bringing to bear their respective superior technologies and engineering design, and compared with the U.S. AGM-86 class of supersonic air-launched cruise missiles, its design philosophy and technical approach differ.

Emphasis on shaping for stealth, with a focus on low-altitude low-speed flight. Departing from the traditional cylindrical missile body, the entire airframe adopts a polyhedral angular configuration—rectangular fuselage, flat layout, conical nose, folding swept wings—maximizing avoidance of specular reflection and compressing radar cross-section. Radar-absorbent coatings and composite materials are employed; the engine exhaust nozzle has been treated to reduce temperature and noise, lowering the probability of infrared and radar detection. The missile is fitted with a TR160 small turbojet engine, subsonic, with a flight speed of approximately Mach 0.8. Its advantage lies in low noise and difficulty for air defense radars to achieve stable lock; it can conduct terrain-hugging flight at altitudes of 30 to 40 meters to execute covert penetration.

Multi-mode composite guidance, emphasizing adaptive correction. The missile employs inertial navigation, GPS satellite positioning, three-dimensional terrain contour matching, and infrared imaging terminal guidance, relying on combined means to ensure strike precision. This enables the missile to automatically avoid obstacles at low altitude over terrain such as mountains, canyons, and coastlines to the greatest extent possible, and also gives it a "fire-and-forget" capability. At the same time, to guard against enemy radar suppression and satellite information spoofing, a built-in electromagnetic anti-jamming module ensures effective operation in complex meteorological and jamming environments, with hit accuracy controllable to within five meters.

Tandem warhead, specifically designed for hard targets. Its warhead differs from conventional blast munitions and is specifically designed against heavily protected hard targets, with strong lethality. The total warhead weight is approximately 450 kilograms. The first stage is a forward-mounted shaped-charge obstacle-defeating warhead that can first penetrate soil, concrete, or armor protection layers—reportedly capable of penetrating six meters of reinforced concrete or approximately 20 meters of soil. The second stage is the main lethal penetrating warhead, which can bore inside before detonating. This is particularly suited for striking underground fortifications, ammunition depots, hardened aircraft shelters, and heavily armored vehicles and other high-value targets. If employed effectively, a single missile can paralyze key facilities; if multiple missiles are fired simultaneously with multi-directional attack, the saturation strike effect is even stronger.

Incorporating intelligent design, with moderate stand-off capability. The missile employs relatively advanced software, possessing route pre-programming capability, supporting target priority determination, capable of flexibly planning circuitous routes, able to self-destruct if the wrong target is identified, and capable of switching strike targets en route—tactical flexibility is high, highlighting nascent "intelligent" (智能) operational characteristics. The standard export variant has a range limited to 250 kilometers; the self-use variant can reach up to 560 kilometers. Although its range is somewhat "short" compared to the U.S. military's AGM-158 Extended Range Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM-ER) with a range exceeding 1,000 kilometers, by leveraging low-altitude stealth combined with long-distance launch it can still ensure that aircraft need not penetrate deep into enemy air defense zones to conduct strikes.

In addition, the munition is compact in size and occupies little space on pylons; a single aircraft can carry at least two, and its modular design allows it to be adapted to most fighter aircraft—this is also the primary reason why, after the UK and France provided it to Ukraine, Ukrainian Su-24 fighters were able to carry it after moderate modification.

Combat Effectiveness Demonstrated, but Capability Shortfalls Increasingly Apparent

Storm Shadow was developed quickly and entered combat even faster; within less than a year of entering service it was successively committed to operations in Iraq and Syria, fully leveraging its advantages to effectively strike and destroy multiple important military facilities. Combat experience demonstrated that the missile's strike effects were good and aircraft loss rates were significantly reduced, establishing its status as Europe's "ace" air-launched cruise missile.

However, as countermeasures have continued to multiply and strengthen, the probability of cruise missiles being spoofed or intercepted has gradually increased. Storm Shadow is no exception. Following its provision to Ukraine in 2023 it has been used intensively, and India also used the missile in May 2025 to strike Pakistani military facilities. These combat uses have fully demonstrated that the missile performs with ease in relatively permissive environments, but in the face of dense air defenses and complex, highly contested environments, its shortfalls and deficiencies are also quite apparent.

Insufficient resistance to strong jamming, susceptible to spoofing. Although Storm Shadow possesses a certain degree of anti-jamming capability, it is not suited to complex electromagnetic environments. During Ukraine's strikes against targets inside Russia, its GPS signal was repeatedly jammed by Russian electronic warfare systems, causing deviation, loss of target, and even crashes. Although the inertial navigation and terrain-matching systems can partially compensate, the infrared imaging terminal guidance system is susceptible to interference from smoke, flares, infrared decoys, and camouflaged targets, causing degradation of strike accuracy. Moreover, the terrain-matching system relies on pre-stored terrain data; when encountering unfamiliar or complex terrain, precision matching degrades.

Flight speed is relatively low, making it susceptible to interception. Speed is not an advantage; once the penetration path is detected or anticipated early, the missile is extremely vulnerable to being locked and intercepted in advance by air defense systems. Russia has on multiple occasions precisely intercepted multiple Storm Shadow missiles using combined modes including radar acquisition, electronic warfare blinding, medium-range air defense missile interception, and long-range early warning.

Relatively limited functionality, limited effects. Storm Shadow's capability to strike moving or time-sensitive targets is weak; it lacks the ability to engage diverse target types such as anti-ship and anti-armor. Its warhead is primarily focused on blast and fragmentation, lacking terminal-phase top-attack dive, shaped-charge armor penetration, thermobaric, and other multi-effect capabilities—particularly deficient in lethality against deeply buried underground fortifications below ten meters or ultra-deep hardened targets. In addition, Storm Shadow can only be launched from airborne carrier aircraft; compared with ship-launched platforms such as Tomahawk, its range is shorter, which to some degree also increases risk to the carrier aircraft.

High cost and low production volume, unable to sustain attrition. Storm Shadow's unit cost is relatively high—approximately two million USD for a lower-specification round, and between 2.5 and 2.8 million USD for a higher-specification round—creating significant economic pressure under sustained high-intensity use. Furthermore, due to limited prior production capacity, after several local conflicts and foreign aid transfers, UK and French stockpiles are stretched thin. Combined with additional purchase requests from foreign users such as India, in order to replenish stocks the UK and France announced in July 2025 the restart of production lines; however, production capacity is reportedly limited, with some output still to be provided to Ukraine, and current production capacity appears unable to support large-scale strike operations.

Adapting to Future Warfare: Continuous Incremental Upgrades and Iteration

Based on the problems and deficiencies exposed in combat, and in conjunction with future operational requirements, the UK and France, under the framework of a new "industrial accord," plan to advance Storm Shadow missile upgrades along multiple tracks and to promote development of a successor variant.

First, incremental improvement: upgrade to Mk2 standard. This is also a deep modification program, focused on building upon the mid-life extended Mk1 missile to further upgrade the GPS anti-jamming module, planning to integrate the European Galileo navigation system, improve terrain-matching system map resolution, add an airborne two-way data link, and integrate a next-generation infrared imaging seeker—comprehensively addressing the failure problem after suppression by electronic warfare. The Mk2 standard plans to incorporate intelligent algorithms to enhance recognition of moving or time-sensitive targets and dynamic target priority assignment capability, optimize low-altitude penetration paths, and implement saturation attacks through multi-missile coordination and cooperation with unmanned aerial vehicles to reduce the probability of interception. In addition, the upgraded variant will improve engine performance to extend endurance and improve the subsonic penetration disadvantage, and will upgrade the warhead with pre-compatibility for heavy bunker-busting warhead technology to strengthen strike effectiveness against deeply buried underground targets, with consideration given to adapting for maritime deep-strike requirements.

Second, extended range and enhanced capability: develop a next-generation replacement. The UK and France in 2025 proposed the Future Cruise/Anti-Ship Weapon (FC/ASW) dual-track program. According to the plan, the UK will take primary responsibility for developing an air-launched subsonic stealth cruise missile to replace Storm Shadow, while France will lead the development of a supersonic anti-ship missile to replace the Harpoon anti-ship missile. It is reported that the successor variant may adopt a flying-wing configuration, incorporate intelligent (智能化) technology, employ a modular warhead, and feature low observability, intelligent composite guidance, autonomous swarm networking, and other defining characteristics, with a range expected to reach 600 to 1,000 kilometers and combined deep-strike capability against both land and maritime targets.

Overall, Storm Shadow was born of the demands of actual combat and will be fundamentally transformed by the demands of future operations; its development, employment, and evolutionary trajectory merit continued attention.

Original Chinese
凭借特有的弹道和突防能力,巡航导弹在战场上常被用作“踹门利器”,在现代战争中一再扮演重要角色。然而,随着战争样式和形态不断演变,为更好实现突防、降低被拦截的概率,巡航导弹的进化也一直在路上。 英国和法国于20世纪90年代中期联合研制的“风暴阴影”,就是这样一款远程隐身精确打击巡航导弹。自去年英法宣布复产“风暴阴影”空射巡航导弹后,今年2月双方又宣布要将该型导弹升级到Mk2标准。 那么,“风暴阴影”究竟是一款什么样的导弹,让英法两国重启生产线扩产?它的“升级之路”,又能折射出巡航导弹未来发展的哪些新动向新趋势?请看本期解读。 英法联合推进空射巡航导弹升级—— “风暴阴影”飞向何方 ■柴水萍 张志敏 “风暴阴影”空射巡航导弹。阳明供图 “海湾”之殇,亟需“圈外”打击利器 海湾战争期间,美国使用“战斧”巡航导弹高效实现防区外精确打击且零伤亡,而欧洲“狂风”战斗机因需深入伊拉克防空火力圈投弹而损失惨重,仅英国就损失7架、多名飞行员阵亡或被俘,在多国部队中损失战机数量最多,暴露出远程高精度打击能力短板。海湾战争让英国充分认清没有防区外导弹就没有载机安全,必须加速发展属于自己的空基导弹。 联合研制,摆脱对美国依赖。回溯历史,早在1982年马岛战争后,英国等国就意识到远程打击武器不可或缺,同年北约多国启动“模块化防区外武器(MSOW)”计划,然而该计划由于美国退出而告终。为加速获得防区外打击武器,1994年英国启动了“常规防区外空射导弹(CASOM)”项目,经过多轮竞标与技术验证,英国最终选择与法国联合研制,选择直接基于法国几近成型的“阿帕奇”C型反跑道巡航导弹进行深度改装研发。 快马加鞭,5年实现列装。英国选择与法国联手,也是出于技术、成本、周期等多重因素考虑。两国于1996年7月签约,1997年授予欧洲导弹集团研制合同,2000年12月由法国“幻影”2000N战斗机首次试射,2002年率先装备英国皇家空军,从签订研制合同到列装只花了5年时间,可以说周期短、效率高,及时填补了这一领域空白。 一弹两名,软件系统有异同。英法两国根据各自需求,英国版叫“风暴阴影”,法国版叫“斯卡普”-EG。二者硬件相同,关键技术同源,但所采用的软件、接口及子系统略有不同。英国“风暴阴影”适配北约通信系统、数据链及标准,主要装备“狂风”GR4和“台风”战斗机;法国则采用自主研制的航电与任务软件,主要用于装备“幻影”2000D和“阵风”等战斗机,且更为强调自主作战能力。 集中优势研发,设计有其独特之处 “风暴阴影”可以说是英法两国倾尽自身优势技术和工程设计而研发的一款亚声速隐身防区外空射巡航导弹,与美国AGM-86类超声速空射巡航导弹相比,其设计理念和技术路线有所不同。 注重外形隐身,强调低空低速。摒弃传统导弹圆柱外形,通体采用多面体棱角构型,矩形弹体、扁平布局、锥形头部、折叠式后掠翼,最大化规避镜面反射,压缩雷达反射截面积。采用吸波涂层和复合材料,发动机尾喷口做了降温降噪处理,降低红外与雷达探测概率。搭载TR160小型涡喷发动机,亚声速,飞行速度约0.8马赫。其优势在于噪声低、不易被防空雷达稳定锁定,可在30至40米的低空贴地飞行,实施隐蔽突防。 多模复合制导,突出自适应修正。采用惯性导航、GPS卫星定位、三维地形轮廓匹配和红外成像末制导,靠组合手段确保打击精度,使导弹能最大程度紧贴山地、峡谷、海岸线等低空自动避障,也使其具备了“发射后不管”的能力。与此同时,为防止敌方雷达压制、卫星信息欺骗,内置了电磁抗干扰模块,确保在复杂气象与干扰环境下仍能有效运行,命中精度能控制在5米以内。 串联式战斗部,专门对付硬目标。其战斗部与常规爆破弹有区别,专门针对高防护硬目标而设计,毁伤力强。弹头总重约450千克,第一级为前置聚能装药破障弹头,可率先穿透土层、混凝土或装甲防护层,据称可击穿6米钢筋混凝土或约20米土层;第二级为主杀伤侵彻弹头,可钻入内部起爆,尤为适合打击地下工事、弹药库、加固机堡和重装甲车辆等高价值目标,如果发挥得当,单弹就可瘫痪关键设施,如果多弹齐射+多向攻击,饱和打击效果则更强。 融入灵智设计,防区外能力适中。采用了较为先进的软件,具备航线预编程能力、支持目标优先级判定、可灵活规划迂回航线,认错目标可自爆,中途亦可切换打击对象,战术灵活性高,突显初级“智能”作战特性。标准出口型射程限制在250千米,自用型最远可达560千米,虽然与美军射程超1000千米的AGM-158增程型联合防区外空地导弹相比射程略“短”,但其借助低空隐身+远距发射,也能确保战机无需深陷敌方防空圈即可实施打击。 此外,该弹药体积紧凑、挂载占用空间小,单架战机至少可挂载2枚,且采用模块化设计,能适配大多数战机,这也是英法援助乌克兰后,乌克兰苏-24战斗机经过适度改装均可挂载的主要原因。 实战显威,但也渐显能力短板 “风暴阴影”研发快,投入实战更快,服役不足1年就陆续投入伊拉克、叙利亚行动,充分发挥优势,有效打击摧毁了多个重要军事设施。实战表明该型导弹打击效果较好,战机损失率大幅降低,确立了其作为欧洲“王牌”空射巡航导弹的地位。 然而,随着反制手段不断增多、变强,巡航导弹被诱偏、拦截的概率逐渐增大。“风暴阴影”也不例外,2023年援助乌克兰后密集使用,印度也于2025年5月使用了该型导弹打击了巴基斯坦军事设施。这些实战充分证明,该型导弹在相对宽松的环境下“游刃有余”,但面对严密防空和复杂强对抗环境,其短板不足亦相当明显。 抗不住强干扰,易被诱偏。虽然“风暴阴影”导弹具有一定的抗干扰能力,但不适应复杂电磁环境。乌克兰打击俄境内目标期间,其GPS信号就多次被俄军电子战系统干扰导致偏航、丢失目标甚至坠毁,虽然惯性导航和地形匹配系统能部分补偿,但其红外成像末制导系统易受烟雾、热焰弹、红外诱饵和伪装目标干扰,导致打击精度下降。而且,地形匹配系统依赖预存地形数据,如遇陌生或复杂地形,精度匹配就降低。 飞行速度偏低,易被拦截。速度不占优,一旦突防路径被提早预警或预判,就极易被防空系统提前锁定并拦截。俄罗斯多次利用雷达捕获、电子战致盲、防空导弹中程拦截或远程预警等组合模式精准拦截多枚“风暴阴影”。 功能比较单一,效果有限。“风暴阴影”对移动或时敏目标打击能力偏弱,缺乏反舰、反装甲等多样化目标适配能力。其战斗部主打爆破和破片,缺乏末段俯冲攻顶、聚能破甲和云爆等多效应,特别是对于10米以下的深埋地下工事或超深加固目标毁伤能力欠缺。此外,“风暴阴影”只能依托空中载机发射,相比“战斧”舰载发射等,射程要短,某种程度上也增加了载机风险。 造价高且产量少,经不起消耗。“风暴阴影”使用成本偏高,低配的1枚200万美元左右、高配的1枚250~280万美元不等,持续高强度使用经济压力大。此外,由于前期产能有限,经过几场局部战争和外援后,英法两国存量捉襟见肘。加上印度等国外用户提出增购需求,为充裕库存,2025年7月英法两国宣布重启生产线,但据称产能有限,部分还要援助乌克兰,目前来看,其产能难以支撑规模打击。 适应未来战争,不断增量升级迭代 基于实战暴露出的问题不足,结合未来作战需求,英法两国在新的“工业协约”框架下,计划多线推动“风暴阴影”导弹升级,并推动后继型号研发。 一是增量改进,升级至Mk2标准。这也是深度改装方案,重点在经过中期延寿的Mk1导弹基础上,进一步升级GPS抗干扰模块、筹划集成欧洲“伽利略”导航系统、提升地形匹配系统地图分辨率、增加机载双向数据链、集成新一代红外成像导引头,融合解决被电子战压制后失效问题。Mk2标准计划融入智能算法,增强对移动或时敏目标识别、动态目标优先级分配能力,优化低空突防路径,通过多弹协同、与无人机协作等模式实施饱和攻击,降低被拦截概率。此外,升级型号将改进发动机性能,提升续航并改善亚声速突防弱势,并将升级战斗部,预兼容重型攻坚弹头技术,强化对地下深埋目标打击效能,考虑适配对海纵深打击需求。 二是增程提能,发展下一代予以替换。英法两国于2025年提出了“未来巡航/反舰武器(FC/ASW)”双钩型项目。按计划,由英国主牵头负责研制空射型亚声速隐身巡航导弹,用于替换“风暴阴影”;由法国主导超声速反舰导弹研发,用于替换“鱼叉”反舰导弹。据悉,后继型或将采用飞翼布局,融入智能化技术,采用模块化战斗部,具备较低可探测性、智能复合制导、自主集群组网等典型特征,射程有望达到600~1000千米,兼顾对地对海纵深打击能力。 总的来看,“风暴阴影”源于实战之需,也将脱胎换骨于未来作战所需,其发展运用及发展进化值得持续关注。