Establish and Practice the Correct Outlook on Political Achievement | Break Through Empty Formalism in Training, Focus Effort on Winning
A Certain Brigade of the Northern Theater Command Air Force Guides Party Member Cadres to Direct Their Efforts Toward War——
Break Through Empty Formalism in Training, Focus Effort on Winning
■ Jiang Yang, Liang Shuang
Summer on the Bohai Sea, rotor blades thundering. Several helicopters from a certain brigade of the Northern Theater Command Air Force skimmed the sea at low altitude, locked onto targets, and opened fire from the air. "Target precisely destroyed!" a staff officer from the brigade reported to the commander.
Since the beginning of this year, a series of subjects closely approximating actual combat conditions—including nighttime live-fire shooting and sea-target shooting—have become routine training content for the brigade. This transformation stems from the brigade Party committee's practical measures to turn the blade inward, rectify deviations in the outlook on political achievement (政绩观), and firmly establish an orientation toward war-fighting.
For a period in the past, the brigade's training subjects were at times mismatched with actual combat requirements. At one brigade meeting, when relevant organs and each battalion reported on training conditions, members of the brigade Party committee standing committee raised pointed questions: some training content was outdated and lacked breakthroughs, and new subjects had not been added on the basis of actual combat requirements.
Faced with the unsparing questioning from Party committee standing committee members, the brigade's operations and training section chief engaged in self-reflection and candidly acknowledged: "When formulating training plans, there was indeed a utilitarian mindset that emphasized competition evaluations and assessments while slighting practical combat application; for new subjects requiring breakthroughs, because the payoff period is long and results are difficult to quantify, they were not incorporated into daily training plans..."
After the meeting, brigade Party committee standing committee members launched an investigation into this problem and found that the phenomenon of prioritizing near-term results over practical combat application was not an isolated case. "Fixating only on the current scorecard rather than aiming at winning on the future battlefield is, at its root, a deviation in the outlook on political achievement. If not corrected in a timely manner, it will inevitably damage the foundation of the unit's combat effectiveness." In conjunction with the study and education campaign on establishing and practicing the correct outlook on political achievement, the brigade Party committee demanded that Party member cadres resolutely rectify ideological understandings and training styles that deviate from the combat effectiveness standard, and place the center of gravity of all work on improving actual combat capability.
With ideological barriers broken, steps became more grounded. In response to the reality of units being dynamically dispersed and conducting training at multiple locations, brigade Party committee standing committee members each assumed their respective responsibilities, leading organ section personnel to go down to each battalion and frontline positions to conduct research and tackle key and difficult training subjects; adhering to the principle of "how the battle is fought is how the troops train" (仗怎么打,兵就怎么练), subjects were set in close alignment with actual combat, driving training transformation and upgrading; selected personnel of different specialties were dispatched to conduct regular rotating spot-checks and guidance, driving improvements in the contribution rate of organizing and conducting training, subject research, and other activities to combat readiness.
With the assistance of the brigade Party committee and organs, a certain battalion abandoned the concept of "results-only-ism" (唯显绩论), proactively leveraged the cooperative zone mechanism to construct a complex adversarial environment, and launched a new round of cross-service chain-building and communications-linking exercises. Focusing on key and difficult content such as ultra-long-distance link support, they repeatedly forged the hard skills needed to win. Not long ago, during a cross-service training exercise, the battalion started from foundational work and cleared link bottlenecks one by one. "Training is not to compete for glory, but only to win on the battlefield!" a battalion cadre said with conviction.
As the study and education campaign deepened, the brigade's officers and soldiers continued to direct their efforts toward practical utility and war-fighting: a certain chemical defense unit, in response to a capability bottleneck among drivers of a certain type of vehicle, arranged for backbone personnel to take turns going to the station's motor transport company for intensive skills training; the station focused its energy on resolving difficult and stubborn problems, effectively converting the reduction in problems into incremental gains in combat effectiveness building... The brigade's leadership introduced that they will continue to consolidate the results of the study and education campaign, guide officers and soldiers to concentrate all their thoughts and energy on combat effectiveness, and with a hard-working style of true effort and solid action, drive the brigade's combat effectiveness building to a new level.