Grasping Implementation Is an Important Benchmark for Measuring One's Outlook on Political Achievement
Grasping Implementation Is an Important Benchmark for Measuring One's Outlook on Political Achievement
■ Jia Changwen
In doing work, one part is deployment and nine parts are implementation. Grasping implementation reflects the ideological conduct, work conduct, and leadership conduct of leading cadres, and is an important benchmark for measuring a leading cadre's outlook on political achievement (政绩观). Only by persisting in seeking truth and being pragmatic, having the courage to tackle difficulties, and sustaining effort over the long term can one truly produce real results and genuine achievements in work—only then can one be said to have established and practiced a correct outlook on political achievement.
At present, the task of fighting and winning the battle to achieve the centenary goal of army-building (建军一百年奋斗目标) is arduous and heavy. One must keep one's feet on the ground and work with genuine effort to deliver a passing answer sheet. But looking at the actual situation, a small number of leading cadres have not yet fully eradicated such bad tendencies as fraud and deception and showy but ineffective work (花拳绣腿). Some direct their mental energy toward image projects (面子工程) that are visible to higher levels, while turning a blind eye to work that genuinely needs to be implemented. Some shout slogans loudly and strike high-pitched postures, yet in practice are restless and impatient, unwilling to roll up their sleeves and put in hard work. Some are vainglorious and eager for quick results—before work has even been carried out in depth, they rush to summarize experience. The greatest principles are the simplest; what matters most is hard work. To create achievements, one must set concrete measures that are closely aligned with the actual conditions of the troops, thoroughly absorb the spirit of higher-level directives, and implement them creatively and precisely—one cannot apply a one-size-fits-all approach that floats in the air and never lands. One must grasp the steps concretely, advancing step by step and tackling each link one by one, proceeding steadily and consolidating at every step, without going through the motions, without cutting corners, and without seeking workarounds. One must grasp concrete results, placing the standard of verification on the quality and effectiveness of training for war, the resolution of grassroots difficulties, and the completion of major tasks—one cannot use paper measures and false data to embellish political achievements.
Political achievements are not won by beating gongs and drums; they are fought for by bearing hardship, difficulty, heavy burdens, and danger. In those years, our army, armed with the iron vow of "we do not believe there is a mission that cannot be completed, we do not believe there is a difficulty that cannot be overcome, we do not believe there is an enemy that cannot be defeated," overcame powerful enemies and formidable obstacles and won victory in war. On the new journey of strengthening and revitalizing the military, there are still many "snow mountains" and "grasslands" to cross, still many "Loushan Pass" and "Lazikou" to conquer—what is especially needed is the spirit of responsibility (担当精神) to advance in the face of difficulty and assault hard problems. For leading cadres to open up new vistas for the development of their work, they must confront contradictions and problems directly without avoidance. On prominent problems that officers and soldiers have raised strong concerns about, they must conduct in-depth investigation and understanding, list them item by item for rectification, and in particular must "settle old accounts" (理旧账)—boldly taking on historically inherited, longstanding, and difficult problems rather than passing the buck or shirking responsibility. They must be unequivocal in breaking through thorny difficult problems, daring to plunge into the vortex of contradictions, chewing on hard bones and taking up hot potatoes—stepping forward when they should step forward, coordinating when they should coordinate, tackling key problems when they should tackle key problems, and finding every possible way to resolve difficulties. They must not retreat when confronting risks and challenges, always upholding principles and daring to struggle, unafraid of offending people, and completing whatever task the Party has assigned regardless of the circumstances and conditions.
What is most valuable in governance is consistency. Sustaining effort over the long term (久久为功) is not only a work method and an attitude toward getting things done—it is also a value orientation and a quality of mind and character. Leading cadres should possess both the perspective of "success need not come in my time" (功成不必在我) and the sense of responsibility of "success will surely come with my contribution" (功成必定有我). By persisting in seeing one blueprint through to the end and carrying forward the spirit of hammering nails, one can continuously accumulate small victories into great ones. Advancing the cause of military strengthening is a systems engineering project; there is much foundational work to be done, and it is impossible to accomplish everything in one stroke—one must be prepared to fight a protracted battle. One must carry forward the struggle with the overall situation in mind, just as successive Party committees of Youyu County, one term after another, planted trees to control desertification and turned barren land into a green oasis on the frontier—respecting reality and respecting one's predecessors, and as long as a blueprint is genuinely feasible, carrying it forward baton by baton, without each principal officer having a different idea, constantly switching channels and "flipping the pancake" (翻烧饼). One must persevere and do things well to completion, always tightening the screws and winding the spring, seeing things through to the end no matter how difficult, and not allowing a strong start to trail off into a "half-finished project" (半拉子工程). One must pursue excellence and refine one's work, adhering to the principle of "reaching the broadest scope while attending to the finest detail" (致广大而尽精微), carrying forward a conduct of precision, meticulousness, and exactness, doing work in a solid manner, and eliminating carelessness, laxity, and low-level mistakes.
When leading cadres are upright in themselves, clean in themselves, and strong in themselves, they will have backbone as people and confidence in undertaking work and building achievements. In advancing the implementation of work, one must always be selfless and fearless, and exercise power with impartiality. In grasping unit development, advancing projects, and completing tasks, the first priority is to use the public mind to restrain the private mind and use impartiality to restrain partiality—one must absolutely never harbor the impulse to "grab something for oneself," the delusion that "power not used before it expires is wasted," or the wishful thinking that "no one will see when it's dark and the wind is high." One must act in accordance with laws and regulations and make decisions scientifically—one must absolutely never engage in "one-person rule" (一言堂) or allow a single individual to have the final say, let alone wantonly break through the red lines and bottom lines of law and discipline. Before any matter, one must first ask clearly about the policy basis, regulatory systems, and disciplinary requirements, and advance strictly according to principles, procedures, and norms, ensuring that all work and development always operates on the track of the rule of law.