← Daily Brief
Exercises Doctrine

A Unit of the 81st Group Army Incorporates Squad Leaders into the Command Training System

第八十一集团军某部将班长纳入指挥训练体系
PLA Daily (解放军报) 11 May 2026
View original source ↗
A unit of the 81st Group Army has restructured its squad-leader training program to address deficiencies in independent command, establishing a dedicated command training class, introducing officer-enlisted mentorship pairings, and pushing command authority down to the squad level during adversarial exercises. The reform was triggered by a documented training failure in which a squad leader's inability to act without higher authorization caused a stalled offensive after his platoon leader was ruled killed in action. The initiative reflects a PLA-wide tension between the legacy 'directive-style' command culture—which conditions junior leaders toward passive execution—and the decentralized, adaptive command competencies required for combined-arms operations under degraded conditions.

A Unit of the 81st Group Army Incorporates Squad Leaders into the Command Training System——

"The Soldier's Head and the Officer's Tail" Takes the Command Seat

■ Shu Kai, Zhang Jiaxun

Not long ago, a tactical training exercise under a realistic combat backdrop got underway at a unit of the 81st Group Army.

"Begin the operation!" At the order, mechanized infantry company squad leader Wang Bo commanded his troops to carry out the mission: unmanned aerial vehicles lifted off for reconnaissance, racing drones executed precise penetration strikes, and each element coordinated according to the plan… Before long, they successfully eliminated the "enemy" observation post and completed the encirclement of the objective.

"Unlike before, this training exercise had squad leaders take the command seat, independently planning the entire operation and making decisions on the spot," Jiang Lei, an officer of the unit, told the author. This shift stemmed from a previous failure.

Prior to this, the unit participated in realistic combat training, with the 2nd Platoon of a mechanized infantry company serving as the advance combat element. At a critical moment, the platoon leader was ruled "killed in action," and according to the combat plan, 1st Squad leader Zhou Yong assumed command. However, faced with a series of special situations issued by the exercise control group—"personnel casualties," "sniper suppression," and others—Zhou Yong sought approval up the chain of command at every step, and his failure to act decisively caused the unit to miss the window of opportunity, resulting in a stalled offensive.

"The squad leader, as 'the soldier's head and the officer's tail' (兵头将尾), occupies the lowest end of the command and control chain, combining the roles of commander and combatant. He must know both how to lead troops and how to employ them." At the after-action review, Jiang Lei went straight to the root of the problem. Their investigation found that the previous "directive-style" (指令式) training model had conditioned squad leaders to passively execute orders, leaving them deficient in independent command and on-the-spot response capabilities.

In response, the unit decided to use a command cadre intensive training course as an opportunity to fully incorporate squad leaders into the command training system: a command training class was established, inviting experienced military officers to lecture and mentor squad leaders; a "pairing of officers and enlisted, with veterans leading newcomers" mechanism was introduced, using a "one case, one analysis" approach to guide squad leaders in learning command skills and accumulating command experience. In addition, during adversarial training, command authority was pushed downward, allowing squad leaders to independently assess the situation, organize coordination, and plan and make decisions, using mission-driven methods to help squad leaders identify their weaknesses and clarify the direction of their efforts. To address the common capability shortfall of "weak coordination ability" among squad leaders, the unit also constructed realistic adversarial conditions, specifically incorporating elements such as special-situation handling and command coordination, to help squad leaders strengthen their command skills and decision-making ability through realistic combat training.

As the training entered a critical phase, the "enemy" dug in behind fortified positions and attempted to launch a counterattack. With the window of opportunity fleeting, Wang Bo decisively ordered: "First element, fix them frontally; second element, flank them with a flanking maneuver around the street corner!" Under his flexible command, each element coordinated closely and successfully dismantled the "enemy" defensive system.

Firepower disposition requires improvement, human-machine coordination is insufficiently tight… At the after-action review following the exercise, Wang Bo led his troops in identifying 3 categories of 12 specific problems and formulated targeted corrective measures.

"Today, squad leaders play the leading role and shoulder the main burden in realistic combat training; their command coordination is more proficient and their battlefield adaptability more flexible," the unit's leadership stated. In a recent continuous day-and-night training exercise, each squad element coordinated with seamless cooperation and successfully completed the mission.

Original Chinese
第八十一集团军某部将班长纳入指挥训练体系—— “兵头将尾”走上指挥席 ■束 凯 张嘉勋 前不久,第81集团军某部一场实战背景下的战术训练拉开帷幕。 “开始行动!”指令传来,装步连班长王博指挥官兵展开作业:无人机升空侦察、穿越机精准突防、各小组依案协同……很快,他们顺利拔除“敌”观察哨,完成对目标合围。 “与以往不同,此次训练班长走上指挥席,全程自主谋划、临机决策。”该部干部蒋磊告诉笔者,这一转变源于一次失利。 此前,该部参加实战化训练,装步二排担任先遣战斗队。关键时刻,排长被判定“阵亡”,按照战斗预案,一班班长周勇接替指挥。然而,面对导调组接连下达的“人员伤亡”“狙击压制”等特情,周勇层层请示,因未能果断处置而错失战机,导致进攻迟滞。 “班长作为‘兵头将尾’,身居指挥控制链末端,集指挥员与战斗员于一身,既要会带兵,还要会用兵。”复盘会上,蒋磊直指问题症结。他们调研发现,以往“指令式”训练模式让班长们习惯于被动执行,独立指挥与临机处置能力欠缺。 为此,该部决定以指挥员集训为契机,将班长全面纳入指挥训练体系:开设指挥训练班,邀请经验丰富的军事干部为班长授课辅导;推行“官兵结对、以老带新”机制,采取“一案一析”方式,引导班长学习指挥本领、积累指挥经验。此外,他们在对抗训练中下沉指挥权限,让班长独立研判态势、组织协同、谋划决策,通过任务牵引帮助班长找准短板不足、明确努力方向。针对班长们普遍存在的“协同能力较弱”等能力短板,该部还构设逼真对抗条件,针对性设置特情处置、指挥协同等环节,帮助班长们在实战化练兵中强化指挥本领和决策能力。 训练进入关键阶段,“敌”依托坚固工事负隅顽抗,并企图发起反攻。战机稍纵即逝,王博果断下令:“一组正面牵制,二组沿街角迂回侧击!”在他灵活指挥下,各小组密切协同,成功瓦解“敌”防御体系。 火力配置有待改进、人机协同不够紧密……训练结束后的复盘会上,王博带领官兵梳理出3类12个具体问题,并制订针对性改进措施。 “如今,班长在实战化训练中唱主角、挑大梁,指挥协同更加娴熟,战场应变更加灵活。”该部领导介绍,近期跨昼夜连贯训练中,各班组配合默契,圆满完成任务。