← Daily Brief
Political Work

"Squad Leader, Today I'm Going to Test You"

“班长,今天我来考考你”
PLA Daily (解放军报) 11 June 2026
View original source ↗
A naval unit's airfield transportation and repair squad introduced a 'mutual fault-setting, two-way exchange' supplementary training mechanism after a conscript soldier with college-level vehicle engineering training correctly diagnosed an aircraft tow tractor failure that the squad's senior NCO, First Sergeant Liu, misread by relying on accumulated experience over diagnostic instrument data. The article documents a specific institutional friction point in PLA ground-level technical units: the 'veterans leading newcomers' model suppresses upward correction because junior personnel defer to NCO seniority even when they hold superior technical knowledge, creating conditions for maintenance blind spots and latent equipment hazards. The new mechanism—formalized into weekly on-post training rotations—represents a Party branch-level workaround to a hierarchy problem the formal mentorship structure itself produces, and the article's publication fits a broader pattern of PLA media using anecdotal unit-level reforms to model how junior organizations should handle the tension between institutional seniority norms and the technical competencies that college-educated conscripts increasingly bring into service.

"Squad Leader, today I'm going to test you…" On a weekend morning, inside a repair workshop, Private Xiao Shen from a certain naval unit's airfield transportation and repair squad stood before an aircraft tow tractor and, smiling, issued a challenge to First Sergeant Squad Leader Liu. Squad Leader Liu accepted in good spirits.

Before this, an indescribable awkwardness had long stood between this mentor and apprentice. On one occasion, an aircraft tow tractor suddenly lost power during training. Xiao Shen, who had studied vehicle-related engineering in college, cross-referenced the data from an intelligent diagnostic instrument and concluded the problem was a control software issue. Squad Leader Liu waved his hand with confidence: "This kind of power interruption—it's almost always poor circuit contact."

The two opened the hood to inspect and found the wiring intact. Xiao Shen quietly suggested, "How about we follow the diagnostic instrument's prompt and try restarting the program?" Sure enough, after doing so, the vehicle returned to normal. Squad Leader Liu stood in front of the vehicle in silence for a moment, then patted Xiao Shen on the shoulder: "Good work." The words were praise, but his expression involuntarily fell slightly.

After more than a decade of repair work, he had been shown up today by a conscript soldier, and he felt more than a little unsettled.

Xiao Shen also sensed the squad leader's mood and quietly stepped aside. The atmosphere in the vehicle became suddenly charged.

That evening, Squad Leader Liu reflected on the incident. He had served for many years, attended countless large and small training sessions, and had never been lax in his technical skills—yet today he had "crashed." It was fortunate that Xiao Shen had stepped in and resolved it in time. He should have been pleased. Thinking it through this way, the unease in his heart immediately dissolved.

First thing the next morning, Squad Leader Liu sought out Xiao Shen on his own initiative: "You performed well yesterday—your thinking was clear. I'm commending you for it. I clung to old experience and put on the airs of a veteran. Going forward, when we encounter technical problems, we all need to have that spirit of scientific rigor (科学较真的劲头). Don't hold back."

Later, Squad Leader Liu, in his capacity as a noncommissioned officer branch committee member (军士支委), brought this experience to the branch committee meeting. He said: "Although I am relatively familiar with the equipment, anyone can have blind spots. Under the traditional 'veterans leading newcomers' (老带新) model, new comrades often hold back out of deference to the veterans' face—even when they spot a problem, they find it hard to speak up directly. Over time, this not only affects work efficiency but can easily allow technical blind spots to develop into hidden hazards."

In response to this type of problem, the Party branch studied the matter carefully and, building on the 'veterans leading newcomers' model, piloted a supplementary training mechanism of 'mutual fault-setting and two-way exchange' (互设故障、双向交流)—during weekly on-post skills training time, new and veteran repair workers take turns setting problems for each other and cross-diagnosing them, forming a regularized routine of professional exchange. This is what gave rise to the scene at the opening of this article.

The problem Xiao Shen posed was a difficult fault in the hydraulic braking system of a new-model vehicle. Squad Leader Liu went through the lines and slave cylinders by old experience and found nothing wrong, his brow furrowing.

Xiao Shen gently reminded him: "Squad leader, the master cylinder design on this new vehicle type is different from the older equipment—when it's blocked, the symptoms are very subtle." Squad Leader Liu checked, and sure enough, that was the case.

Squad Leader Liu straightened up and nodded at Xiao Shen: "That was a high-caliber question—it stumped me." He then reflected: "I always used to think my technical foundation was solid. Now I understand: years of service don't equal strength of ability. Young people bring new perspectives and new methods. Only by learning from each other can we advance together."

Since the new mentorship approach was introduced, the airfield station's repair cycle has shortened and fault-clearance efficiency has improved markedly. Even more gratifying is the change in the workshop's atmosphere—barriers have diminished, discussion has increased, veterans no longer stand on ceremony, and new soldiers are no longer constrained. Faced with difficult equipment problems, everyone learns from one another, and the unit has pulled together as one.

Original Chinese
“班长,今天我来考考你……”一个周末上午,修理车间内,海军某部某场站运输修理班列兵小沈站在飞机牵引车前,笑着对一级上士刘班长发起挑战,刘班长愉快接招。 此前,这对师徒之间常横着一层说不清的别扭。有一次,一辆飞机牵引车在训练中突然失去动力,大学时学车辆相关专业的小沈对照智能检测仪的数据,判断是控制软件的问题。刘班长却自信地摆摆手:“这种动力中断的毛病,多半是线路接触不良。” 两人打开机盖检查,发现线路完好无损。小沈小声提示:“要不按检测仪的提示,重启程序试试?” 果然,依此操作后,车辆恢复正常。刘班长站在车前沉默片刻,拍了拍小沈的肩膀:“干得不错。”嘴上夸着,脸色却不自觉地微微一沉。 干了十几年修理,今天被一个义务兵指出了问题,他心里多少有些不是滋味。 小沈也察觉到了班长的情绪,默默走到一旁,车内的气氛一下变得微妙起来。 当天晚上,刘班长回想这件事。他当兵多年,大大小小的培训参加了无数次,专业技术从不含糊,今天居然“翻车”了,幸亏小沈今天及时出招解决,自己本应高兴才对。这么一想,他心里那点别扭立即释然了。 第二天一早,刘班长主动找到小沈:“你昨天表现不错,思路也很清晰,提出表扬。我固守老经验,摆了老兵架子。以后咱们遇到专业上的问题,都要有这股科学较真的劲头,别有顾虑。” 后来,作为军士支委的刘班长把这段经历带到了支委会上。他说:“虽然我对装备比较熟悉,但人难免有疏漏的时候。在传统的‘老带新’模式下,新同志往往碍于老兵面子,即便看出问题,也不好直言。时间一长,不仅影响工作效率,还容易让技术上的盲区演变成隐患。” 针对这类问题,党支部认真研究,在“老带新”模式的基础上,尝试推出“互设故障、双向交流”的训练补充机制——每周岗位练兵时间,新老修理工互相出题、交叉排除,形成常态化的业务交流。这才有了文章开头的一幕。 小沈出的题目是一道新型车辆液压制动的疑难故障。刘班长按老经验查了一遍管路和分泵,没发现问题,眉头皱了起来。 小沈轻声提醒:“班长,这种新车型总泵设计和老型装备不一样,堵塞后症状很隐蔽。”刘班长一查,果然如此。 刘班长直起腰,冲小沈点点头:“这题有水平,把我考住了。”随即感慨:“以前总觉得自己技术底子硬。现在明白了,兵龄长不代表本领强,年轻人有新视角、新方法,互相学才能共进步。” 新的带教办法推行以来,该场站修理周期缩短,故障排除效率明显提高。更令人欣喜的,是车间里的氛围变了——隔阂少了、研讨多了,老兵不再端着、新兵不再拘着,面对装备上的疑难问题,大家互学互鉴,拧成了一股绳。