← Daily Brief
Doctrine Political Work

Grassroots 'Construction Guide' Bears Abundant Fruit,激发官兵内生动力 Igniting the Intrinsic Motivation of Officers and Soldiers

基层“抓建指南”喜结硕果,激发官兵内生动力
PLA Daily (解放军报) 9 June 2026
View original source ↗
An unidentified Army regiment garrisoning a plateau region restructured its headquarters-to-grassroots command relationship by publishing a formal 'list of powers for grassroots autonomous construction' that delegates authority over training scheduling, fund use, ideological education, and daily management to battalion and company commanders, while retaining regimental control over standards, education resources, and logistics support. The article documents a recognized institutional pathology — headquarters organs over-inspecting and under-trusting grassroots units to the point of producing passive, inspection-dependent commands — and records one regiment's procedural response: codifying delegation boundaries rather than relying on informal norms. The outcome metrics offered (improved live-fire scores at a battalion 400 km from regimental headquarters, a UAV and small-arms assessment passed under higher-authority spot check) are consistent with the article's argument but are not independently verifiable, making this most useful as a record of how the PLA is currently framing the grassroots autonomy problem and the specific administrative instrument — the powers list — being promoted as its solution.

An Army Regiment Transforms Its Construction Model to Ignite the Intrinsic Motivation of Officers and Soldiers——

Grassroots Self-Construction: Making Good Use of the 'Guide'

■ Yang Xin

In early summer, deep in the plateau hinterland, an engineer and chemical defense company of an Army regiment organized a professional training exercise. Engineering machinery and equipment roared to life, rapidly clearing obstacles from the road surface; an explosive ordnance disposal robot quickly advanced, climbing slopes and surmounting obstacles, precisely grasping and transferring 'unexploded ordnance'… At the training site, personnel and equipment were smoothly integrated and worked in seamless coordination, successfully completing one professional subject after another.

"War will not let us choose our opponents; peacetime training must be conducted from a position of difficulty and strictness." Stepping off the training ground, Company Commander Yao of the unit said that since undertaking the plateau garrison training mission, they had tailored training content for multiple specialties across the entire company based on the weak points and shortcomings of specialist personnel, scientifically set training cycles, and effectively improved the targeted nature and practical effectiveness of professional training.

The regiment's leadership introduced that the grassroots companies' autonomous management of training and scientific organization of training stemmed from a shift in the guiding thinking of the Party committee and headquarters organs. Previously, during in-depth grassroots investigations, they discovered that because the headquarters organs had insufficient overall coordination and intervened excessively in grassroots affairs, many units were exhausted coping with inspections and assessments and had little time or energy to properly conduct their own all-round construction. Over time, individual units developed a mentality of waiting, relying on, and depending on others.

"Respecting the principal status and pioneering spirit (首创精神) of officers and soldiers, and continuously igniting their intrinsic motivation (内生动力), is the core of grassroots construction." The regiment's leadership introduced that headquarters organ guidance should focus on 'building capacity from within' (造血): it must help grassroots units improve their ability to autonomously manage their own construction by teaching methods, clarifying thinking, and strengthening capabilities. To this end, they closely adhered to the requirements of the Outline for Military Grassroots Construction (《军队基层建设纲要》), grounded themselves in the realities of dispersed plateau garrison training positions and heavy training tasks, refined the boundaries of powers and responsibilities, clarified the chain of responsibility, and promulgated a 'list of powers for grassroots autonomous construction' (基层自主抓建权力清单), giving rise to a vivid situation in which headquarters organs dare to 'let go' and grassroots units diligently 'get to work.'

In practice, they clarified the scope of grassroots autonomous authority in areas including ideological education, training coordination, use of funds, and daily management; sorted out and standardized more than 20 specific matters across 5 categories for which grassroots units are independently responsible; and provided grassroots units with a clear and explicit 'construction guide' (抓建指南). Not long ago, several prefabricated buildings in one company developed leaks. Acting on the authority granted by the list, the company filed a record with the headquarters organ's functional section and carried out repairs independently, with the grassroots discipline inspection commission supervising the entire process; the roof renovation was completed in less than two days.

Entering the armored driving training ground of a certain battalion of the regiment, a scene of intense activity came into view: on the western side of the ground, one group of officers and soldiers took turns training on basic subjects such as slope starts and steering gear changes; on the eastern side, another group conducted continuous skills improvement training between steep slopes and restricted roads; not far away, officers and soldiers participating in assessments drove into a complex assessment section, where examiners strictly scored each item against the standard.

Why did the same subject present different training scenarios? Battalion Commander Lü of the battalion explained that after the spring soldier replacement and discharge work concluded this year, driver positions in each company faced a transition between old and new personnel, and the problem of uneven training foundations was quite pronounced. To address this, they divided all drivers in the battalion into a basic group, an advanced group, and an assessment group, corresponding respectively to basic subject reinforcement, continuous skills improvement, and combat-realistic assessment and testing, dynamically adjusting and progressively advancing through a 'pass to advance' (过关升级) approach.

Discussing the shift in training organization methods, Battalion Commander Lü showed this reporter a weekly training schedule: "The headquarters organs specify the overall training objectives and safety bottom lines for each phase during the garrison training mission; specific training content is independently determined by battalions and companies based on the training syllabus and the baseline assessment of personnel capabilities; each company can flexibly adjust its training organization methods according to its own training progress and weak points."

Thanks to the optimization of the construction approach, remote positions have also taken on many new aspects. Not long ago, a battalion located more than 400 kilometers from the regiment headquarters independently organized a day-and-night live-fire shooting assessment. During the assessment, they independently formulated coordination plans, explored multiple tactical methods and approaches (战术战法), and the rate of good and excellent scores improved markedly compared to previous years. Looking at the score statistics sheet, Battalion Commander Qiu of that battalion said with deep feeling: "After the headquarters organs boldly let go, we threw away our 'crutches,' made good use of the 'guide,' and learned on our own to manage training across the entire chain; the overall quality of battalion and company cadres has been effectively tempered."

"Letting go does not mean washing one's hands of the matter. To ignite the vitality of grassroots autonomous construction, headquarters organs must not only properly delegate authority but also properly serve as the backstop." The regiment's leadership introduced that in order to create favorable conditions and provide institutional support for grassroots autonomous construction, they studied and promulgated a 'three unifications' (三统) mechanism: unified training (统训练)—uniformly standardizing the regiment-wide combat-realistic training standards, ground use norms, and supervision and inspection criteria to ensure training is standardized and orderly; unified education (统教育)—integrating high-quality educational resources, organizing outstanding political instructors to conduct circuit lectures and concentrating efforts on developing model courses, to ensure education more closely meets the needs of officers and soldiers and fits grassroots realities; unified support (统保障)—focusing on the urgent, difficult, and pressing concerns of officers and soldiers such as uniform and equipment distribution and medical treatment, establishing a problem ledger, specifying rectification deadlines, and regularly publicizing progress, to ensure officers and soldiers can devote themselves wholeheartedly to training and war preparation.

Letting go ignites vitality; construction bears abundant fruit. Recently, a company of the regiment underwent a spot assessment by a higher-level authority. The company's officers and soldiers worked in concert and in seamless coordination, achieving outstanding results in multiple subject assessments including the tactical and technical employment of a certain type of unmanned aerial vehicle and light weapons shooting.

Original Chinese
陆军某团转变抓建模式激发官兵内生动力—— 基层自建,善用“指南” ■杨 鑫 初夏时节,高原腹地,陆军某团工程防化连组织一场专业训练。工程机械装备引擎轰鸣,快速清除路面障碍物;排爆机器人迅速前出,爬坡越障,精准抓取、转移“未爆弹”……训练现场,人员和装备衔接顺畅、配合默契,圆满完成一个个专业课目。 “战争不会让我们选择对手,平时练兵必须从难从严。”走下训练场,该连姚连长说,执行高原驻训任务以来,他们针对专业人员短板弱项,为全连多个专业量身定制训练内容,科学设定训练周期,有效提升了专业训练的针对性和实效性。 该团领导介绍,基层连队自主抓训、科学组训,源于党委机关指导思路的转变。此前,他们在深入基层调研时发现,由于机关统筹不够、过多干预基层事务,导致不少单位疲于应付检查考核,没有更多时间和精力搞好自身全面建设。时间一长,个别单位滋长了等靠依赖思想。 “尊重官兵主体地位和首创精神,不断激发官兵内生动力,才是抓建基层的核心所在。”该团领导介绍,机关指导重在“造血”,必须通过教方法、理思路、强能力,帮助基层提高自主抓建本领。为此,他们紧扣《军队基层建设纲要》要求,立足高原驻训点位分散和训练任务繁重的实际,细化权责边界、厘清责任链条,出台“基层自主抓建权力清单”,形成机关敢“放手”、基层勤“动手”的生动局面。 实践中,他们从思想教育、训练统筹、经费使用、日常管理等方面明确基层自主权限,梳理规范5类20余项基层自行负责的具体事务,为基层单位提供了清晰明确的“抓建指南”。前不久,某连多座板房出现漏水情况,连队依据清单赋予的权限,报机关业务股备案后自行修缮,基层纪委全程监督,不到两天便完成了屋顶翻修。 走进该团某营装甲驾驶训练场,一派火热景象映入眼帘:西侧场地,一组官兵轮流训练坡道起步、转向换挡等基础课目;东侧场地,另一组官兵在陡坡与限制路之间开展连贯技能提升训练;不远处,参加考评的官兵驾车驶入复杂考核路段,考官严格对照标准逐项打分。 同一课目为何呈现不同训练场景?该营吕营长介绍,今年春季士兵补选退工作结束后,各连驾驶员岗位面临新老交替,训练基础参差不齐的问题比较明显。为此,他们将全营驾驶员划分为基础组、进阶组和考评组,分别对应基础课目强化、连贯技能提升和实战化考核检验,通过“过关升级”的方式动态调整、逐级闯关。 谈及组训方式的转变,吕营长给笔者展示了一张训练周表:“机关明确驻训任务期间各阶段的训练总目标和安全底线,具体训练内容由营连依据训练大纲和人员能力底数自主确定,各连可根据自身训练进度和短板弱项,灵活调整组训方式。” 得益于抓建思路的优化,偏远点位也焕发出不少新气象。前不久,距离该团机关400余公里的某营自行组织一场跨昼夜实弹射击考核。考核中,他们自主制订协同方案,探索多种战术战法,成绩优良率较往年明显提升。看着成绩统计表,该营邱营长深有感触地说:“机关大胆放手后,我们扔掉‘拐杖’,善用‘指南’,自己学会了全链条抓训练,营连干部的综合素质得到有效锤炼。” “放手不等于甩手。激发基层自主抓建活力,机关既要放好权,更要兜好底。”该团领导介绍,为给基层自主抓建创造良好条件、提供制度支撑,他们研究出台“三统”机制:统训练,统一规范全团实战化训练标准、场地使用规范和督导检查准则,确保训练规范有序;统教育,整合优质教育资源,组织优秀政治教员巡回授课、集中打造精品课程,确保教育更加贴近官兵需求、贴合基层实际;统保障,聚焦被装发放、看病就诊等官兵急难愁盼问题,建立问题台账、明确整改时限、定期公示进展,确保官兵心无旁骛投身练兵备战。 放手激发活力,抓建喜结硕果。近日,该团某连接受上级抽考,全连官兵齐心协力、默契配合,在某型无人机技战术运用和轻武器射击等多个课目考核中取得优异成绩。