Bayi Sharp Commentary | Seek Counsel from the Troops, and Seek Accountability from the Troops
Seek Counsel from the Troops, and Seek Accountability from the Troops
■ Wang Yongwen
Chairman Xi has emphasized that whether performance is good or not must be judged by the actual feelings of the masses, and evaluated by the masses themselves. This profoundly reminds us that a cadre's achievements lie in practice, and a cadre's reputation lies among the troops. Since the military launched its study and education campaign on establishing and practicing a correct view of political achievement (正确政绩观), a certain unit has persisted in both seeking counsel from the troops and seeking accountability from the troops, submitting the question of whether political achievements are good or bad to officers and soldiers for judgment, and erecting a standard of verification for Party member cadres in creating political achievements.
The grassroots level is the foundation of all the military's work and combat effectiveness; the practical focus of establishing and practicing a correct view of political achievement must concentrate on the grassroots and reach directly to officers and soldiers. Officers and soldiers feel most directly the results of what Party member cadres have achieved; officers and soldiers understand most deeply whether those achievements are genuine. In reality, many Party member cadres take root at the grassroots level, keep the troops in their hearts, consciously devote themselves to the cause of strengthening the military in the new era, and win the hearts of officers and soldiers and earn a good reputation through solid, tangible achievements. By contrast, a small number of Party member cadres are keen on pursuing showy and impractical "achievement projects" (政绩工程) and "image projects" (形象工程), causing confusion and exhaustion at the grassroots level as units scramble to cope—the root cause being their detachment from the grassroots and from officers and soldiers.
"Governance flourishes when it follows the will of the people; governance collapses when it goes against the will of the people." Only when military Party member cadres are adept at listening to the voices of officers and soldiers, absorbing their opinions, treating grassroots satisfaction as an important reference for measuring the gains and losses of their work, and treating the sense of gain (获得感) among officers and soldiers as an important basis for evaluating the quality and effectiveness of their work—and only when they resolutely reject and correct such negative tendencies as seeking quick results and projecting a hollow work style—can they inspire the force, motivate officers and soldiers, and create solid achievements that can withstand the tests of practice, of officers and soldiers, and of history.